Eubank v Groves

bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Eubank v Groves

Post by bigjack »

Exoddus wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 12:48 Eubank weighed in more than Groves! :o
Eubank was 76k which is roughly 11.9 so can't see how Groves would be less than that,maybe they made a mistake reading the weights out.
CasualQuaker
Lightweight
Posts: 46
Joined: 30 Dec 2017, 06:36

Re: Eubank v Groves

Post by CasualQuaker »

Groves always looks Gaunt at the weigh in. He will probably be about a stone heavier than Eubank tomorrow night.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13360
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Eubank v Groves

Post by jameswilson »

bigjack wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 12:53
Exoddus wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 12:48 Eubank weighed in more than Groves! :o
Eubank was 76k which is roughly 11.9 so can't see how Groves would be less than that,maybe they made a mistake reading the weights out.
He weighed in 0.4lbs lighter than Eubank so I wouldn't say that's out of the question. You can see Groves has a hell of a lot of weight he can put back on by tomorrow evening.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Eubank v Groves

Post by bigjack »

jameswilson wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 13:00
bigjack wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 12:53
Exoddus wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 12:48 Eubank weighed in more than Groves! :o
Eubank was 76k which is roughly 11.9 so can't see how Groves would be less than that,maybe they made a mistake reading the weights out.
He weighed in 0.4lbs lighter than Eubank so I wouldn't say that's out of the question. You can see Groves has a hell of a lot of weight he can put back on by tomorrow evening.
People keep saying Groves is a big supermiddle,i would of thought he'd be 12 stone at the weighin.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Eubank v Groves

Post by Counter-puncher »

bigjack wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 12:53
Exoddus wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 12:48 Eubank weighed in more than Groves! :o
Eubank was 76k which is roughly 11.9 so can't see how Groves would be less than that,maybe they made a mistake reading the weights out.
Eubank weighed 11st 13lbs 90z IE just under 168lbs. which is actually 74.6 kilos roughly
76 kilos would be over the supermiddleweight limit (171lbs)
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Eubank v Groves

Post by bigjack »

Counter-puncher wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 13:18
bigjack wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 12:53
Exoddus wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 12:48 Eubank weighed in more than Groves! :o
Eubank was 76k which is roughly 11.9 so can't see how Groves would be less than that,maybe they made a mistake reading the weights out.
Eubank weighed 11st 13lbs 90z IE just under 168lbs. which is actually 74.6 kilos roughly
76 kilos would be over the supermiddleweight limit (171lbs)
He definitely said 76k for Eubank
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Eubank v Groves

Post by Counter-puncher »

bigjack wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 13:22
Counter-puncher wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 13:18
bigjack wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 12:53

Eubank was 76k which is roughly 11.9 so can't see how Groves would be less than that,maybe they made a mistake reading the weights out.
Eubank weighed 11st 13lbs 90z IE just under 168lbs. which is actually 74.6 kilos roughly
76 kilos would be over the supermiddleweight limit (171lbs)
He definitely said 76k for Eubank
i got my maths wrong this time :lol: :oops:
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Eubank v Groves

Post by bigjack »

Counter-puncher wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 13:23
bigjack wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 13:22
Counter-puncher wrote: 16 Feb 2018, 13:18

Eubank weighed 11st 13lbs 90z IE just under 168lbs. which is actually 74.6 kilos roughly
76 kilos would be over the supermiddleweight limit (171lbs)
He definitely said 76k for Eubank
i got my maths wrong this time :lol: :oops:
Using the converters online,76 kilos is 11st 13.8
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16751
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Eubank v Groves

Post by keithmoonhangover »

keithmoonhangover wrote: 08 Feb 2018, 07:19 For me, this fight will be won and lost one thing.....

Can Groves control the pace of the fight?

If he can't he's going to get knocked out. If he can, then I think he'll win a clear decision.
I was right for a change. :lol:
jimcook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 842
Joined: 28 Jun 2005, 14:05

Re: Eubank v Groves

Post by jimcook »

TheLeprechaun wrote: 09 Feb 2018, 16:25
jimcook wrote: 09 Feb 2018, 12:54 elite? like ggg 400 amatuer wins and unbeaten as a pro.
elite ? like mayweather world champ at 22 , 5 weight champ, 50 wins not out
elite? like andre ward, unbeaten since he was 13 years old.

eubank jr is 28 years old , and has fought precisely 1 top fighter. he is gonny have to go some to become even world level, never mind elite.
Obviously im basing it off talent and the "eye test". He's definitely world class already, I don't think that can be denied. He's probably the best son of a world champ that's boxed actually. Degale was elite and I remember saying I thought he was going to be elite and got a similar reply.
he even got clowned a bit in the 12th by a one armed groves
Post Reply