Wilder Ortiz. What Changed?

jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Wilder Ortiz. What Changed?

Post by jamamb »

just reading a bunch of predictions and stuff now, and its crazy indeed how far things have changed

reading about the fight most ppl make it sound like a poor mismatch that will be cakewalk for wilder and that ortiz is trash. funny how after ppl saying wilder would never fight ortiz and that ortiz would win if they fought, now ortiz is garbage apparently. ha

personally i havent thought either guy seems much different from a few years ago. wilder was always going to win. i actually dont think hes shown much improvement since winning the wbc, or stepped up his comp till now, but he always beat ortiz for me
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Wilder Ortiz. What Changed?

Post by asdfjkl »

jamamb wrote: 03 Mar 2018, 05:51 just reading a bunch of predictions and stuff now, and its crazy indeed how far things have changed

reading about the fight most ppl make it sound like a poor mismatch that will be cakewalk for wilder and that ortiz is trash. funny how after ppl saying wilder would never fight ortiz and that ortiz would win if they fought, now ortiz is garbage apparently. ha

personally i havent thought either guy seems much different from a few years ago. wilder was always going to win. i actually dont think hes shown much improvement since winning the wbc, or stepped up his comp till now, but he always beat ortiz for me
TBH I still think Ortiz is better, despite he's much older and seems to downgrade fast. I do think Wilder is getting better, I know that Stiverne got much worse, but Wilder also improved over time.
Actually, I think the whole competition improved since AJ showed up, there's more money in the game again, when I looked at the youtube vid about Wilder 3 years ago, I could basically watch every vid out there of him, he was lucky to get 5 reactions on a vid, nowadays that's mission impossible. The top 15 WBC back then was a joke, now only Stiverne and Charles Martin are jokes, all the others are competative up to some point.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28516
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Wilder Ortiz. What Changed?

Post by Coco »

Ortiz's weight is low, I smell an upset.
Wa1nuts
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 515
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 10:01

Re: Wilder Ortiz. What Changed?

Post by Wa1nuts »

Ortiz threw some wild pinches himself against Allen but about 1/10th of the speed of wilders. He's a good fighter but I don't think he's as technically brilliant as people imply
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32957
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Wilder Ortiz. What Changed?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Ortiz has looked pretty garbage in his recent fights, that’s about the only thing which has changed imo.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12047
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Wilder Ortiz. What Changed?

Post by Taansend »

Apparently Showtime had 1.2 million viewers for this bout.

That is great news & a small step in the right direction.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23128
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Wilder Ortiz. What Changed?

Post by mickey1975 »

Taansend wrote: 07 Mar 2018, 12:08 Apparently Showtime had 1.2 million viewers for this bout.

That is great news & a small step in the right direction.
Channel 5ive probably had more for Josh Taylor.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12047
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Wilder Ortiz. What Changed?

Post by Taansend »

mickey1975 wrote: 07 Mar 2018, 17:25
Taansend wrote: 07 Mar 2018, 12:08 Apparently Showtime had 1.2 million viewers for this bout.

That is great news & a small step in the right direction.
Channel 5ive probably had more for Josh Taylor.
True but boxing is big in the UK while very much a fringe sport in America.

Surprised you didn't know that Mickey.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Wilder Ortiz. What Changed?

Post by jamamb »

isnt that about the same that his stiverne fight did. hopefully the audiences keep up. i think it shows the numbers go along with the quality of opponent. stiverne was a big step up and did well on showtime. then ortiz was his next step and it did well. but the fights in between on showtime didnt do nearly as well.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47056
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wilder Ortiz. What Changed?

Post by gilgamesh »

Taansend wrote: 28 Feb 2018, 10:59 Two years ago Ortiz was the top fighter in the division in the eyes of many (on here & elsewhere).

Meanwhile Wilder was considered a joke (ditto), or at least a caveman with great power (by me).

Had they met in the summer of 2016 I know who most would be picking :OhYes:

But, without losing, Ortiz is now a considerable underdog this weekend.

What changed your opinion?

Ortiz's flat performances under the Matchroom banner?

His drug issues?

Wilders much improved performance against Stiverne?

Or is your opinion the same now as it was then :maybe:
When you can't stop Malik Scott a World Title victory does not appear to be in your future.
Post Reply