Langford v welborn

Post Reply
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Langford v welborn

Post by maley1984 »

Local derby for British title 4th may. Walsall town hall. Good fight.
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by leejonesjnr »

Good contest.
Probably Langford on points but should be lively and competitive.
Shame it’s not at a bigger venue.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by Stuarty »

Good scrap. Welborn always gives it his all. Who's promoting this? Will it be televised?
no1man
Welterweight
Posts: 244
Joined: 05 Aug 2015, 11:41

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by no1man »

Thought Langford v Heffron was good as done? Is Langford still with allegedly
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1759
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by ste1983 »

Looking forward to this can't think of a better way to start the Wolves promotion party weekend than watching two WBA fans knock fornicate out of each other!

Haha just kidding big fan of both lads, I'd go Langford wide points but in a good tough competitive fight.

Is this a Warren show?
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by maley1984 »

ste1983 wrote: 29 Mar 2018, 08:30 Looking forward to this can't think of a better way to start the Wolves promotion party weekend than watching two WBA fans knock eff out of each other!

Haha just kidding big fan of both lads, I'd go Langford wide points but in a good tough competitive fight.

Is this a Warren show?
No BCB promotion
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1759
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by ste1983 »

Yeah read properly now.

Am I a miserable fornicate thinking £50 standard is a bit steep its usually £35 for shows like that.
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by maley1984 »

ste1983 wrote: 29 Mar 2018, 09:11 Yeah read properly now.

Am I a miserable eff thinking £50 standard is a bit steep its usually £35 for shows like that.

Yeah that's their normal price is 35.. Needs to b a good solid undercard tho for that money
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1759
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by ste1983 »

maley1984 wrote: 29 Mar 2018, 09:14
ste1983 wrote: 29 Mar 2018, 09:11 Yeah read properly now.

Am I a miserable eff thinking £50 standard is a bit steep its usually £35 for shows like that.

Yeah that's their normal price is 35.. Needs to b a good solid undercard tho for that money
Yeah exactly I'd be happy to pay it if there was a decent undercard say an area title fight on it, but they seem to think it'll sell out quick and no undercard news yet.
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by maley1984 »

ste1983 wrote: 29 Mar 2018, 09:24
maley1984 wrote: 29 Mar 2018, 09:14
ste1983 wrote: 29 Mar 2018, 09:11 Yeah read properly now.

Am I a miserable eff thinking £50 standard is a bit steep its usually £35 for shows like that.

Yeah that's their normal price is 35.. Needs to b a good solid undercard tho for that money
Yeah exactly I'd be happy to pay it if there was a decent undercard say an area title fight on it, but they seem to think it'll sell out quick and no undercard news yet.

Maybe one area fight is my guess. I wudnt expect to much.
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by leejonesjnr »

I think it only holds 600 for boxing so I suppose ticket prices need to be upped to pay the wages.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1759
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by ste1983 »

leejonesjnr wrote: 29 Mar 2018, 10:12 I think it only holds 600 for boxing so I suppose ticket prices need to be upped to pay the wages.
Should have held it somewhere bigger than, suppose Civic being out of action doesn't help but surely there's other places.

Honestly thinking about not bothering its more the principle. Have happily paid £30-£40 to watch Langford and Welborn in worse fights but now there's a bit of a silly football slant to it and a local derby so more interest (ie it'll sell out anyway) they've ramped the prices up.
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by leejonesjnr »

ste1983 wrote: 29 Mar 2018, 10:35
leejonesjnr wrote: 29 Mar 2018, 10:12 I think it only holds 600 for boxing so I suppose ticket prices need to be upped to pay the wages.
Should have held it somewhere bigger than, suppose Civic being out of action doesn't help but surely there's other places.

Honestly thinking about not bothering its more the principle. Have happily paid £30-£40 to watch Langford and Welborn in worse fights but now there's a bit of a silly football slant to it and a local derby so more interest (ie it'll sell out anyway) they've ramped the prices up.
It’s a good enough contest to head up a medium sized show but there aren’t too many options for 2-3000 seaters in Bham and surrounding areas really.
The BCB show at Genting Arena looked pretty empty from the online stream they posted so perhaps not ready to take another crack at such a big one just yet.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by jamamb »

is tommy not with frank anymore or was there just a really good offer from bcb for this fight or something?
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2730
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by SAPFO »

jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by jamamb »

i didnt see welborn vs cunningham was it a fair decision
frankgreaves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 142
Joined: 26 Sep 2010, 08:13

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by frankgreaves »

ste1983 wrote: 29 Mar 2018, 09:11 Yeah read properly now.

Am I a miserable eff thinking £50 standard is a bit steep its usually £35 for shows like that.
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by leejonesjnr »

jamamb wrote: 30 Mar 2018, 04:49 i didnt see welborn vs cunningham was it a fair decision
Yeah I thought so.
I think I had Craig up by about 4 rounds.
It was a good contest, competitive but clear in my eyes.
Besides Craig having already beaten Welborn, he has already had a fight with Langford pulled when Langford went for the interim WBO fight so it is perfectly understandable that he isn't happy to have missed out.
ozzy1875
Middleweight
Posts: 164
Joined: 11 May 2014, 14:49

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by ozzy1875 »

leejonesjnr wrote: 30 Mar 2018, 07:01
jamamb wrote: 30 Mar 2018, 04:49 i didnt see welborn vs cunningham was it a fair decision
Yeah I thought so.
I think I had Craig up by about 4 rounds.
It was a good contest, competitive but clear in my eyes.
Besides Craig having already beaten Welborn, he has already had a fight with Langford pulled when Langford went for the interim WBO fight so it is perfectly understandable that he isn't happy to have missed out.
Understand Craig's disappointment but his point is irrelevant. He's lost his last two fights and therefore couldn't box for a British title anyway. There's been numerous fights where they have fallen through and never materialised after that.
J Costello
Lightweight
Posts: 22
Joined: 13 Nov 2017, 09:16

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by J Costello »

I like Jason he’s a good fella & good luck to him but you’ve got to feel for Craig Cunningham the fight was made then cancelled now he has this rubbed in his face.
Last edited by J Costello on 02 Apr 2018, 07:05, edited 1 time in total.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Langford v welborn

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Has Weshaw not done a poll about this? That Benson dude on Twitter couldn't have mentioned it then.. ..
Post Reply