Wbss: The heavyweights

Post Reply
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by stujones »

I know it's been discussed in the past....but I just think with mandatory status etc and other ambitions the key players could get involved and get this going asap.

Here would be my seeding.

1. Joshua
2. Wilder
3. T Fury
4. Povetkin
5. Ortiz.
6. Pulev (or Possibly parker or charr)
7. Whyte
8. Miller

Quarter final 1.
Joshua vs Miller (gives aj his usa debut)
Qf 2
Povetkin vs Ortiz (Wba title eliminator)
Qf 3
Wilder vs Whyte (wbc title vs mandatory)
Qf 4.
Fury vs 6th seed (whoever out of those 3 would give Fury a ranking).

Semi finals
Winner qf 1 vs winner qf 2
Winner qf 3 vs winner qf 4.
oogiebe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by oogiebe »

If it would be done over a reasonable time table I'd love to see it. So it wouldn't be two losses and your out. It's one and done.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47033
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by gilgamesh »

That'd be an awesome Tournament
oogiebe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by oogiebe »

So are you putting up the money to make it happen or is Hearn?
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26652
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by KiwiRider »

That's bloody tasty Stu, oh how I wish it would happen.
Unfortunately half of them are fight twice a year premadonnas.
I think a WBSS is possible, but only with guys outside the top #8.
And don't forget your mouthwatering list has a few old fellas, you would need some standbys for injuries etc
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by stujones »

KiwiRider wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 19:57 That's bloody tasty Stu, oh how I wish it would happen.
Unfortunately half of them are fight twice a year premadonnas.
I think a WBSS is possible, but only with guys outside the top #8.
And don't forget your mouthwatering list has a few old fellas, you would need some standbys for injuries etc
Yeah I know....just seems with so many eliminators/mamdatories being announced...why not make it into a tournsmemt.....not going to happen I know.

're standbys it would be the usual suspects who seem to be always around these mandatory status....e.g. breazele, the ebu champion, del boy etc.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26652
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by KiwiRider »

stujones wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 20:17
're standbys it would be the usual suspects who seem to be always around these mandatory status....e.g. breazele, the ebu champion, del boy etc.
Cripes Stu! :o
You wouldn't dare drop my beloved Del Boy into the semis as a sub would you?
:shame:
You meanie!
dr_devious
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by dr_devious »

Del Boy drops into the final on an injury substitution, and lands the haymaker on Wilder or Joshua................oh yes :yay: :yay: :yay:
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by PredatorHayds »

Can’t see it happening at Heavyweight.
WBSS is great for a division in boosting general overall income.

Joshua wouldn’t enter as he’s getting vast sums already.

Only way this happens is if you take AJ out. Winner gets AJ.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by stujones »

PredatorHayds wrote: 05 Apr 2018, 10:23 Can’t see it happening at Heavyweight.
WBSS is great for a division in boosting general overall income.

Joshua wouldn’t enter as he’s getting vast sums already.

Only way this happens is if you take AJ out. Winner gets AJ.
Yes, valid point - Kalle though has said between sniffs on IFL that one of the principle reasons for getting Muhammad Ali's trademark involved is to make a heavyweight edition. I guess it would depend on any other deal - perhaps Hearn could develop more of an "hands on" role and therefore £££/$$$ in future tournaments as part of the negotiations to get AJ on board.

I don't think there has been any indication that all the fighters are on the same wage and venue etc seems to be negotiated after each contest. If AJ needs to fight these mandatories, then why not make it as part of a tournament and perhaps being part of a tournament might make the sanctioning bodies be a bit more flexible in terms of fulfilling such obligations.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16926
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by Nightmare Roy »

It would be great but with AJ making 20+ for any fight he has, the money wouldn't be there for it.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by stujones »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 05 Apr 2018, 20:20 It would be great but with AJ making 20+ for any fight he has, the money wouldn't be there for it.
I guess it would depend on how they structure it....i cannot see why they cannot structure aj's fights in the same / similar way as his fights are structured now.....e.g. so the promoters are still making money.

I don't see a reason why ajs fights could not be in big stadiums with sky box office supporting etc. The current set up is using different sized venues based on the magnitude of each individual fight. If they negotiated a separate package for aj's involvement then why not.....if he lost in the first round they wouldn't need to worry about will he continue to sell out stadiums and ppv numbers as he would be out.

If Eddie can make money on aj then why cannot the tournament. Yes it would mean huge Eddie involvement.....but then why not.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23125
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by mickey1975 »

stujones wrote: 05 Apr 2018, 22:59
Nightmare Roy wrote: 05 Apr 2018, 20:20 It would be great but with AJ making 20+ for any fight he has, the money wouldn't be there for it.
I guess it would depend on how they structure it....i cannot see why they cannot structure aj's fights in the same / similar way as his fights are structured now.....e.g. so the promoters are still making money.

I don't see a reason why ajs fights could not be in big stadiums with sky box office supporting etc. The current set up is using different sized venues based on the magnitude of each individual fight. If they negotiated a separate package for aj's involvement then why not.....if he lost in the first round they wouldn't need to worry about will he continue to sell out stadiums and ppv numbers as he would be out.

If Eddie can make money on aj then why cannot the tournament. Yes it would mean huge Eddie involvement.....but then why not.
Because why would Matchroom share with anyone?
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by keirw »

stujones wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 19:32 I know it's been discussed in the past....but I just think with mandatory status etc and other ambitions the key players could get involved and get this going asap.

Here would be my seeding.

1. Joshua
2. Wilder
3. T Fury
4. Povetkin
5. Ortiz.
6. Pulev (or Possibly parker or charr)
7. Whyte
8. Miller

Quarter final 1.
Joshua vs Miller (gives aj his usa debut)
Qf 2
Povetkin vs Ortiz (Wba title eliminator)
Qf 3
Wilder vs Whyte (wbc title vs mandatory)
Qf 4.
Fury vs 6th seed (whoever out of those 3 would give Fury a ranking).

Semi finals
Winner qf 1 vs winner qf 2
Winner qf 3 vs winner qf 4.
Not sure Charr should get a mention alongside Pulev and Parker, giving him far too much credit :OhYes:

Would be a great tournament though.

Shame it will never happen :verysad:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by stujones »

mickey1975 wrote: 06 Apr 2018, 03:26
stujones wrote: 05 Apr 2018, 22:59
Nightmare Roy wrote: 05 Apr 2018, 20:20 It would be great but with AJ making 20+ for any fight he has, the money wouldn't be there for it.
I guess it would depend on how they structure it....i cannot see why they cannot structure aj's fights in the same / similar way as his fights are structured now.....e.g. so the promoters are still making money.

I don't see a reason why ajs fights could not be in big stadiums with sky box office supporting etc. The current set up is using different sized venues based on the magnitude of each individual fight. If they negotiated a separate package for aj's involvement then why not.....if he lost in the first round they wouldn't need to worry about will he continue to sell out stadiums and ppv numbers as he would be out.

If Eddie can make money on aj then why cannot the tournament. Yes it would mean huge Eddie involvement.....but then why not.
Because why would Matchroom share with anyone?
If Perhaps Eddie had secured some deal to get into the financial pot for all future WBSS fights - even those not involving Matchroom fights.... Highly unlikely yes, but Eddie and Kalle have worked closely and well together in the past. Seem to have a good relationship. Kalle's fights were once shown exclusively on fightpass.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by stujones »

keirw wrote: 06 Apr 2018, 04:24
stujones wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 19:32 I know it's been discussed in the past....but I just think with mandatory status etc and other ambitions the key players could get involved and get this going asap.

Here would be my seeding.

1. Joshua
2. Wilder
3. T Fury
4. Povetkin
5. Ortiz.
6. Pulev (or Possibly parker or charr)
7. Whyte
8. Miller

Quarter final 1.
Joshua vs Miller (gives aj his usa debut)
Qf 2
Povetkin vs Ortiz (Wba title eliminator)
Qf 3
Wilder vs Whyte (wbc title vs mandatory)
Qf 4.
Fury vs 6th seed (whoever out of those 3 would give Fury a ranking).

Semi finals
Winner qf 1 vs winner qf 2
Winner qf 3 vs winner qf 4.
Not sure Charr should get a mention alongside Pulev and Parker, giving him far too much credit :OhYes:

Would be a great tournament though.

Shame it will never happen :verysad:
Yes, I was thinking Charr if Fury wanted an easier comeback fight.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by lillywhite14 »

The problem you have with this is when one fighter has 3 of the belts, there’s not actually much doubt as to who the main man is. Chuck in that Joshua earns more for fighting Carlos Takam than the other 7 names mentioned have made between them in their entire careers, well, it’s going to difficult to convince Joshua and his promoter/team that he needs to enter anything like this :lol:

Shame because it’s a good line up.
Boxing Writer
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1347
Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 16:45

Re: Wbss: The heavyweights

Post by Boxing Writer »

stujones wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 19:32 I know it's been discussed in the past....but I just think with mandatory status etc and other ambitions the key players could get involved and get this going asap.

Here would be my seeding.

1. Joshua
2. Wilder
3. T Fury
4. Povetkin
5. Ortiz.
6. Pulev (or Possibly parker or charr)
7. Whyte
8. Miller

Quarter final 1.
Joshua vs Miller (gives aj his usa debut)
Qf 2
Povetkin vs Ortiz (Wba title eliminator)
Qf 3
Wilder vs Whyte (wbc title vs mandatory)
Qf 4.
Fury vs 6th seed (whoever out of those 3 would give Fury a ranking).

Semi finals
Winner qf 1 vs winner qf 2
Winner qf 3 vs winner qf 4.
Charr shouldn't be in the mix. He is definitely not a top-10 fighter
Post Reply