No at the start of the round, like in that fight. I saw it several times before. In a few wars I remember the start being delayed while both get checked. I never took any note because the times I saw it was before any of this nonsense.x2x wrote: ↑10 Apr 2018, 13:19BitPlayer wrote: ↑10 Apr 2018, 03:11No it didn't. I've seen it loads recently on big cards, before too, probably because of a few deaths and serious injuries in the ring recently.x2x wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 14:22
Maybe the "new rule" started with the Wilder-Ortiz fight and they told this ref to do it too so they can say, hey look refs always do that! I've never seen anything like it. *
Those additional seconds Wilder got at the beginning of rd. 8 were critical because he was rubber legged on queer street...and we know that the powers that be in boxing didn't want their Wilder cash cow to lose because they were counting on making big money with a Joshua-Wilder fight.
Boxing is so corrupt, and in the USA nowadays they are right in your face about it. They don't even care. Boxing has always been the domain of shady characters, but at least in the past the shady characters had the discretion to stay in the shadows and lend boxing at least the outward appearance of being a legitimate sport
* No, on second thought I probably have. I've seen so much crap in the crooked "sport" of boxing
If they were checking out Ortiz you lot would be talking about them being desperate to stop him.
Can you show me a single example where a ref/ring doctor dived in at the cricial moment during a round when a fighter was wobbled and in trouble?
Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
I almost forgot about the mother Candyass. My iggy list just keeps growing. What a bunch of clowns.candyslim wrote: ↑10 Apr 2018, 03:02He's right you know. Save your hatred for Hearn and Joshua and your unconditional love for Wilder. That's just so much betterBadhusker wrote: ↑09 Apr 2018, 22:01X2X, why don't you, your brother asdfjkl, and your dad Kalan just STFU. Your hatred of Wilder and unconditional love of Povetkin is annoying, to say the least. Move on.x2x wrote: ↑09 Apr 2018, 19:01
Except it is not justifiable. He can't stop the fight right in the middle of the action like that and give the house fighter time to recuperate. He could have called off the fight and said that Wilder is unfit to continue, that's all.
There's a million cases like this in crooked boxing. People gripe for five minutes and then it's swept under the rug and you hear no more about it.![]()
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
ya, and notice how it gets distorted to make it seem like right in the middle of the action wilder got saved. it was between rounds the doctor checked on him a bit. ortiz had the round to finish him and he couldnt. wilder has been hurt a few times before as a pro but always come back to win. he can recoup. its one of his strengths
its a joke that this thread was bumped yet again, just a strange level of soreness. get over it. its obvious some ppl wanted to see wilder kod and just cant get over the fact that he won yet again.
and instead of gaining respect for wilder, they look for ways to discredit things so they can stay fixed on hating him
its a joke that this thread was bumped yet again, just a strange level of soreness. get over it. its obvious some ppl wanted to see wilder kod and just cant get over the fact that he won yet again.
and instead of gaining respect for wilder, they look for ways to discredit things so they can stay fixed on hating him
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9448
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
Good postjamamb wrote: ↑10 Apr 2018, 22:56 ya, and notice how it gets distorted to make it seem like right in the middle of the action wilder got saved. it was between rounds the doctor checked on him a bit. ortiz had the round to finish him and he couldnt. wilder has been hurt a few times before as a pro but always come back to win. he can recoup. its one of his strengths
its a joke that this thread was bumped yet again, just a strange level of soreness. get over it. its obvious some ppl wanted to see wilder kod and just cant get over the fact that he won yet again.
and instead of gaining respect for wilder, they look for ways to discredit things so they can stay fixed on hating him
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
How old are these guys writing this nonsense? Sound about eleven.
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
what sounds about 11 is thinking that wilder was saved by his face shield beard and the got saved again by a quick inspection. fact is ortiz tried his best and didnt have enough. he got dropped 3x and stopped. wilder got dropped no times and won
move on and try giving some respect, the same respect youd give wilder if he were a russian or ukranian.
move on and try giving some respect, the same respect youd give wilder if he were a russian or ukranian.
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
......
Last edited by Ilya Muromets on 11 Apr 2018, 01:52, edited 1 time in total.
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
jamamb wrote: ↑10 Apr 2018, 23:18 what sounds about 11 is thinking that wilder was saved by his face shield beard and the got saved again by a quick inspection. fact is ortiz tried his best and didnt have enough. he got dropped 3x and stopped. wilder got dropped no times and won
move on and try giving some respect, the same respect youd give wilder if he were a russian or ukranian.
You keep going on about "face shields". Are you insane? Then ignoring the salient (that means important) points raised and trying to make ad hominem attacks (that means trying to attack your debate adversary rather than addressing the issues) and trying to atribute motives (that means why somebody does something) of your own, instead of addressing (that means talking about) the issues (that means what we've been talking about) - such as: "if he were a russian or ukrainian". Also outright lying (that means deliberately not telling the truth) - such as: "ref (that's the third guy in the ring, the one not wearing the shorts, generally hired by the "friends" these days to try help things along so that right fighter (the ones in the shorts) comes out the winner..For example: "ref didnt jump in during the action /round".
There are two kinds of posters on here, very good ones and very silly ones. Make that three: and in between ones (like the Boogy Woogy Man). Same as everyplace else i guess.
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
Your "Iggy list" ? ... What are you, four years old?
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
Standing eight counts were removed from boxing years ago. Rightly so. Imagine you’re in your way to stopping your opponent the ref gives him a breather and he chins you.Impractical Poster wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 16:05 Just something for the haters to bitch about. Next thing you know, they will be bitching about standing 8 counts, and how this fighter was robbed of a ko win due to the extra 10-15 seconds the fighter got to recover for the ref to stop time, give the count, and resume the fight.
People making too much out of nothing.
Wilder wasn't THAT hurt.
-
SenorPipino
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6055
- Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
Sorry asdjfkl---I mean x2x---but it was between rounds.
That's a safety rule in a growing number of states. It's been done in California for close to 20 years.
BTW, doctors come into the ring all the time to check fighters cuts for safety reasons.
Delays the action but safety is the number 1 consideration.
Some of you guys get unwound so easily.
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
SenorPipino wrote: ↑11 Apr 2018, 11:30
Sorry asdjfkl---I mean x2x---but it was between rounds.
That's a safety rule in a growing number of states. It's been done in California for close to 20 years.
BTW, doctors come into the ring all the time to check fighters cuts for safety reasons.
Delays the action but safety is the number 1 consideration.
Some of you guys get unwound so easily.
What kind of stupid lies are you nitwits trying to sell? I know they expect us to have memory spans of about ten seconds, but some of us haven't been quite that dumbed down yet. Between rounds my ass! Here is the video:
Last edited by Ilya Muromets on 11 Apr 2018, 14:40, edited 2 times in total.
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
Covfefe wrote: ↑11 Apr 2018, 10:30Standing eight counts were removed from boxing years ago. Rightly so. Imagine you’re in your way to stopping your opponent the ref gives him a breather and he chins you.Impractical Poster wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 16:05 Just something for the haters to bitch about. Next thing you know, they will be bitching about standing 8 counts, and how this fighter was robbed of a ko win due to the extra 10-15 seconds the fighter got to recover for the ref to stop time, give the count, and resume the fight.
People making too much out of nothing.
Wilder wasn't THAT hurt.
Which is of course exactly what happened.
Like it says in the video, Wilder wasn't even cut. There was absolutely no excuse for stopping the fight except to give him time to recover!!!
Last edited by Ilya Muromets on 11 Apr 2018, 14:49, edited 1 time in total.
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
-
Impractical Poster
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7636
- Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
Guess that would explain why I haven't seen one in a while.Covfefe wrote: ↑11 Apr 2018, 10:30Standing eight counts were removed from boxing years ago. Rightly so. Imagine you’re in your way to stopping your opponent the ref gives him a breather and he chins you.Impractical Poster wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 16:05 Just something for the haters to bitch about. Next thing you know, they will be bitching about standing 8 counts, and how this fighter was robbed of a ko win due to the extra 10-15 seconds the fighter got to recover for the ref to stop time, give the count, and resume the fight.
People making too much out of nothing.
Wilder wasn't THAT hurt.
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
Impractical Poster wrote: ↑11 Apr 2018, 19:10Guess that would explain why I haven't seen one in a while.Covfefe wrote: ↑11 Apr 2018, 10:30Standing eight counts were removed from boxing years ago. Rightly so. Imagine you’re in your way to stopping your opponent the ref gives him a breather and he chins you.Impractical Poster wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 16:05 Just something for the haters to bitch about. Next thing you know, they will be bitching about standing 8 counts, and how this fighter was robbed of a ko win due to the extra 10-15 seconds the fighter got to recover for the ref to stop time, give the count, and resume the fight.
People making too much out of nothing.
Wilder wasn't THAT hurt.
At least with a standing 8 count they counted it as knockdown on the scorecard. With this latest nonsense the ring doctor (let's see his medical degree!) and the clown dressed up in the referee costume (let's see his referee degree!) just intervene to give the house favored fighter a medical examination (open wide and say ahhh) whenever they feel like it, just in case he gets in trouble.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
Badhusker, why didn't the doctor care about Ortiz when he nedded it? It's obvious that Wilder received unfair protection, despite he did a much more fair job.SenorPipino wrote: ↑11 Apr 2018, 11:30Sorry asdjfkl---I mean x2x---but it was between rounds.
That's a safety rule in a growing number of states. It's been done in California for close to 20 years.
BTW, doctors come into the ring all the time to check fighters cuts for safety reasons.
Delays the action but safety is the number 1 consideration.
Some of you guys get unwound so easily.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
SenorPipino, why don't you and you mum Badhusker just STFU? Your fear of Povetkin, AJ, Miller, Whyte, Mansour, Briggs, Klitschko, Pulev, Parker and unconditional love of Wilder is annoying, to say the least. Move on.Badhusker wrote: ↑09 Apr 2018, 22:01X2X, why don't you, your brother asdfjkl, and your dad Kalan just STFU. Your hatred of Wilder and unconditional love of Povetkin is annoying, to say the least. Move on.x2x wrote: ↑09 Apr 2018, 19:01Except it is not justifiable. He can't stop the fight right in the middle of the action like that and give the house fighter time to recuperate. He could have called off the fight and said that Wilder is unfit to continue, that's all.
There's a million cases like this in crooked boxing. People gripe for five minutes and then it's swept under the rug and you hear no more about it.
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
They’ve been gone nearly twenty years but occasionally a ref has done it. I can see why they got rid of it, it is a strange thing to do. If you’re worried a fighter is getting hurt he should be stopped, giving him a break is a weird advantage and imagine if he then chins the guy with the next shot you’ve effectively handed him the fight. Then there’s iffy times like Froch-Bute it kind of looks like a standing 8 count but the ref deemed the ropes had kept him up and gave him a mandatory 8 count like Povetkin got against Price, but people assumed it was a standing 8 count.Impractical Poster wrote: ↑11 Apr 2018, 19:10Guess that would explain why I haven't seen one in a while.Covfefe wrote: ↑11 Apr 2018, 10:30Standing eight counts were removed from boxing years ago. Rightly so. Imagine you’re in your way to stopping your opponent the ref gives him a breather and he chins you.Impractical Poster wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 16:05 Just something for the haters to bitch about. Next thing you know, they will be bitching about standing 8 counts, and how this fighter was robbed of a ko win due to the extra 10-15 seconds the fighter got to recover for the ref to stop time, give the count, and resume the fight.
People making too much out of nothing.
Wilder wasn't THAT hurt.
There really needs to be universal rules across all belts at this point, it’s strange that some bouts still have different rules like the three knockdown rule for instance. We had four Pacquiao Marquez fights that with a different title on the line could have been a one round blow out with no point in a rematch.
Re: Luis Ortiz’s team claim ‘robbery’ in Deontay Wilder fight
You really don't think about the standing eight count being gone due to mandatory 8 count. IMO. It's a stupid thing the standing 8 count. For amateur boxing only.Impractical Poster wrote: ↑11 Apr 2018, 19:10Guess that would explain why I haven't seen one in a while.Covfefe wrote: ↑11 Apr 2018, 10:30Standing eight counts were removed from boxing years ago. Rightly so. Imagine you’re in your way to stopping your opponent the ref gives him a breather and he chins you.Impractical Poster wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 16:05 Just something for the haters to bitch about. Next thing you know, they will be bitching about standing 8 counts, and how this fighter was robbed of a ko win due to the extra 10-15 seconds the fighter got to recover for the ref to stop time, give the count, and resume the fight.
People making too much out of nothing.
Wilder wasn't THAT hurt.