A hard puncher and a great puncher are different concepts.The Great John L wrote: ↑01 May 2018, 08:20Actually Knoetze was a very hard puncher, just not a very good fighter. Norton and Tate were both decent punchers but very good offensive fighters who could put punches together.
Barry Bonds was a great hitter, not only because he could hit with power and get the meat of the bat over the heart of the plate at the apogee of his swing... He could read the spin on the ball... He knew if it was a split finger, 2 seam, 4 seam, palm ball, or cutter. If it was going to rise, sink, cut in, or swerve away.. He knew if it was in the strike zone.. You don't need to be the best hitter in the league to be great -- but you need to be better than 99% of your peers.. People throw around the word great like it means good... If you're in the top 20% I want you on my team, but you're not a great player.
Joshua is a great puncher not only just cuz he can hit with power. He can get his jab on a good boxer. He has a variety of feints and combinations he can fool you with. You don't have to be a great boxer to be a great puncher, but it helps... At a minimum you need to get punches on John Tate and certainly on Mike Koranicki.. Knoetze couldn't do that.. He quit Boxing after 5 years and 27 fights.. He was very smart if not talented.. Clint said, "A man has to know his limitations."