The Mack is Back
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16926
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: The Mack is Back
Doubt AJ's arse is twitching after watching that.
Re: The Mack is Back
Now that's over let's see Fury v Price
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: The Mack is Back
Top 10 of what? None of them are in any of the sanctioning bodies top 10s at the moment.mickey1975 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 14:58No mate, Tyson, Hughie and Nathan. You'll catch up when you get home....
Re: The Mack is Back
I'm not sure I get all this big talk of what Fury once was and can be again.
Was he really as good as some suggest? He had the win of his life against Klitschko where he won a load of titles, but he never defended any of those belts. Was that night in Germany a one off? Let's not also forget that he landed less than 90 punches over 12 rounds against Klitschko, just over 7 punches a round, hardly the schooling that many think it was.
I just don't buy all the hyperbole, not then and certainly not now.
Was he really as good as some suggest? He had the win of his life against Klitschko where he won a load of titles, but he never defended any of those belts. Was that night in Germany a one off? Let's not also forget that he landed less than 90 punches over 12 rounds against Klitschko, just over 7 punches a round, hardly the schooling that many think it was.
I just don't buy all the hyperbole, not then and certainly not now.
Re: The Mack is Back
I'm a Fury fan but he has been built up a bit much during his absence. His win over Klitschko was fantastic but it could have been a matter of styles plus Wlad thinking Tyson was a clown (in that case, brilliant kidology Furyconfused wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 10:32 I'm not sure I get all this big talk of what Fury once was and can be again.
Was he really as good as some suggest? He had the win of his life against Klitschko where he won a load of titles, but he never defended any of those belts. Was that night in Germany a one off? Let's not also forget that he landed less than 90 punches over 12 rounds against Klitschko, just over 7 punches a round, hardly the schooling that many think it was.
I just don't buy all the hyperbole, not then and certainly not now.
Or Fury could truly be amazing. Time will tell & I hope he stays dedicated & that W@rren delivers rather than go safety first.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: The Mack is Back
Me too,just don't get the hype that he put on some masterclass boxing display against Wlad,Joshua and Wilder won't hold back because of 7 jabs a round being thrown at them.confused wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 10:32 I'm not sure I get all this big talk of what Fury once was and can be again.
Was he really as good as some suggest? He had the win of his life against Klitschko where he won a load of titles, but he never defended any of those belts. Was that night in Germany a one off? Let's not also forget that he landed less than 90 punches over 12 rounds against Klitschko, just over 7 punches a round, hardly the schooling that many think it was.
I just don't buy all the hyperbole, not then and certainly not now.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: The Mack is Back
Wazza is always safety first unless it's a title fight,the one time he well and truly cocked up was Prescott v Khan,even then he claimed it was the trainers call.Taansend wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 10:55I'm a Fury fan but he has been built up a bit much during his absence. His win over Klitschko was fantastic but it could have been a matter of styles plus Wlad thinking Tyson was a clown (in that case, brilliant kidology Furyconfused wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 10:32 I'm not sure I get all this big talk of what Fury once was and can be again.
Was he really as good as some suggest? He had the win of his life against Klitschko where he won a load of titles, but he never defended any of those belts. Was that night in Germany a one off? Let's not also forget that he landed less than 90 punches over 12 rounds against Klitschko, just over 7 punches a round, hardly the schooling that many think it was.
I just don't buy all the hyperbole, not then and certainly not now.).
Or Fury could truly be amazing. Time will tell & I hope he stays dedicated & that W@rren delivers rather than go safety first.
-
martinmrts
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 207
- Joined: 19 Nov 2008, 02:24
Re: The Mack is Back
in what way is Tyson Fury a Mack, exactly ?
Re: The Mack is Back
It's still convulsing from the Wilder $50m offer
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16926
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: The Mack is Back
Re: The Mack is Back
Here's one for you. Ronal McIntosh claims to be 6'9" tall. Tyson Fury is listed as 6'9" tall. I've never thought he's quite that tall. In boxing boots you're always going to be disadvantaged versus street shoes but....observe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmBqfEX3DM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmBqfEX3DM
Re: The Mack is Back
Ronal Looks quite a bit taller on that clip, Ronal is closer to the camera and maybe wearing 3 inch heeled shoes?Sklar wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 13:25 Here's one for you. Ronal McIntosh claims to be 6'9" tall. Tyson Fury is listed as 6'9" tall. I've never thought he's quite that tall. In boxing boots you're always going to be disadvantaged versus street shoes but....observe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmBqfEX3DM
Re: The Mack is Back
Tyson is back and will go from strength to strength, last night just a little warm up after losing all the weight and that there
Re: The Mack is Back
I've never understood that either. I always thought I was missing something.
Eagle eyed boxrecers may have noticed that Tyson was billed as 6'8.5" last night. He must have shrunk.Sklar wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 13:25 Here's one for you. Ronal McIntosh claims to be 6'9" tall. Tyson Fury is listed as 6'9" tall. I've never thought he's quite that tall. In boxing boots you're always going to be disadvantaged versus street shoes but....observe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmBqfEX3DM
Re: The Mack is Back
Big Ron is about 7 foot+ if Tyson is 6'9"
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: The Mack is Back
I know, what the fck is that about?
Re: The Mack is Back
Return of the Mack??
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: The Mack is Back
Tyson does appear to be looking up at him at times,difficult to say for sure though.Sklar wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 13:25 Here's one for you. Ronal McIntosh claims to be 6'9" tall. Tyson Fury is listed as 6'9" tall. I've never thought he's quite that tall. In boxing boots you're always going to be disadvantaged versus street shoes but....observe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmBqfEX3DM
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: The Mack is Back
Fun fight, went pretty much as expected. Shame he picked such a weak comeback opponent but at least Seferi is more competent than Peter McNeeley or Conor McGregor. The clowning around tickled me--reminded me of Ali's antics in his less important fights. Which I suppose means that last night there was... Shades of Ali.
Anyway glad the fat gippo's back from the wilderness--any chance he could direct Ron McIntosh to it? Boxing broadcasts could do without his fat-tongued jabbering for a few years.
Anyway glad the fat gippo's back from the wilderness--any chance he could direct Ron McIntosh to it? Boxing broadcasts could do without his fat-tongued jabbering for a few years.
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

-
smiling assassin
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12
Re: The Mack is Back
Fury against Klitschko was far from a boxing masterclass but he did win the fight and it was quite clear cut. Joshua went life and death with him albeit in a completely different manner, and some say That makes Joshua the man. Let’s see what Tyson is like in 12 months time and then these 2 can settle it. That’s if Joshua has still got them belts and wilder hasn’t gatecrasged the party
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23119
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: The Mack is Back
Bad form, that.Tuan_Jim wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 15:13 Fun fight, went pretty much as expected. Shame he picked such a weak comeback opponent but at least Seferi is more competent than Peter McNeeley or Conor McGregor. The clowning around tickled me--reminded me of Ali's antics in his less important fights. Which I suppose means that last night there was... Shades of Ali.
Anyway glad the fat gippo's back from the wilderness--any chance he could direct Ron McIntosh to it? Boxing broadcasts could do without his fat-tongued jabbering for a few years.
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: The Mack is Back
Didn't realise you were a Ron Mac fan, Mickey. In fact I didn't realise Ron had fans at all.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45235
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: The Mack is Back
Hahahaha! Cruel but hilarious, im cackling like a witch who just spoilt her neighbours milk.