The Mack is Back

Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16926
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Doubt AJ's arse is twitching after watching that.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by DrDuke »

BitPlayer wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 18:11 Looked rusty, especially early, and needs to get the flab off. But great to see him back
Yeah. Still have things to fix after such terribly long time off. Well, he warmed up a bit, probably he'll come back in a better shape in august.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12046
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by Taansend »

Now that's over let's see Fury v Price
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by maverick23 »

mickey1975 wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 14:58
Taansend wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 14:57
mickey1975 wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 14:36 3 cousins in top ten.
Is that the new England World Cup song?
No mate, Tyson, Hughie and Nathan. You'll catch up when you get home....
Top 10 of what? None of them are in any of the sanctioning bodies top 10s at the moment.
confused
Lightweight
Posts: 1
Joined: 28 May 2018, 11:07

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by confused »

I'm not sure I get all this big talk of what Fury once was and can be again.

Was he really as good as some suggest? He had the win of his life against Klitschko where he won a load of titles, but he never defended any of those belts. Was that night in Germany a one off? Let's not also forget that he landed less than 90 punches over 12 rounds against Klitschko, just over 7 punches a round, hardly the schooling that many think it was.

I just don't buy all the hyperbole, not then and certainly not now.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12046
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by Taansend »

confused wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 10:32 I'm not sure I get all this big talk of what Fury once was and can be again.

Was he really as good as some suggest? He had the win of his life against Klitschko where he won a load of titles, but he never defended any of those belts. Was that night in Germany a one off? Let's not also forget that he landed less than 90 punches over 12 rounds against Klitschko, just over 7 punches a round, hardly the schooling that many think it was.

I just don't buy all the hyperbole, not then and certainly not now.
I'm a Fury fan but he has been built up a bit much during his absence. His win over Klitschko was fantastic but it could have been a matter of styles plus Wlad thinking Tyson was a clown (in that case, brilliant kidology Fury :TU: ).

Or Fury could truly be amazing. Time will tell & I hope he stays dedicated & that W@rren delivers rather than go safety first.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by bigjack »

confused wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 10:32 I'm not sure I get all this big talk of what Fury once was and can be again.

Was he really as good as some suggest? He had the win of his life against Klitschko where he won a load of titles, but he never defended any of those belts. Was that night in Germany a one off? Let's not also forget that he landed less than 90 punches over 12 rounds against Klitschko, just over 7 punches a round, hardly the schooling that many think it was.

I just don't buy all the hyperbole, not then and certainly not now.
Me too,just don't get the hype that he put on some masterclass boxing display against Wlad,Joshua and Wilder won't hold back because of 7 jabs a round being thrown at them.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by bigjack »

Taansend wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 10:55
confused wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 10:32 I'm not sure I get all this big talk of what Fury once was and can be again.

Was he really as good as some suggest? He had the win of his life against Klitschko where he won a load of titles, but he never defended any of those belts. Was that night in Germany a one off? Let's not also forget that he landed less than 90 punches over 12 rounds against Klitschko, just over 7 punches a round, hardly the schooling that many think it was.

I just don't buy all the hyperbole, not then and certainly not now.
I'm a Fury fan but he has been built up a bit much during his absence. His win over Klitschko was fantastic but it could have been a matter of styles plus Wlad thinking Tyson was a clown (in that case, brilliant kidology Fury :TU: ).

Or Fury could truly be amazing. Time will tell & I hope he stays dedicated & that W@rren delivers rather than go safety first.
Wazza is always safety first unless it's a title fight,the one time he well and truly cocked up was Prescott v Khan,even then he claimed it was the trainers call.
martinmrts
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 207
Joined: 19 Nov 2008, 02:24

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by martinmrts »

in what way is Tyson Fury a Mack, exactly ?
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by BigDoofus »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 18:15 Doubt AJ's arse is twitching after watching that.
It's still convulsing from the Wilder $50m offer :lol:
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16926
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by Nightmare Roy »

BigDoofus wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 12:56
Nightmare Roy wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 18:15 Doubt AJ's arse is twitching after watching that.
It's still convulsing from the Wilder $50m offer :lol:
It's a done deal, but Wilder has to come to the UK as he's the B side
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by Sklar »

Here's one for you. Ronal McIntosh claims to be 6'9" tall. Tyson Fury is listed as 6'9" tall. I've never thought he's quite that tall. In boxing boots you're always going to be disadvantaged versus street shoes but....observe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmBqfEX3DM
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by Rexob »

Sklar wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 13:25 Here's one for you. Ronal McIntosh claims to be 6'9" tall. Tyson Fury is listed as 6'9" tall. I've never thought he's quite that tall. In boxing boots you're always going to be disadvantaged versus street shoes but....observe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmBqfEX3DM
Ronal Looks quite a bit taller on that clip, Ronal is closer to the camera and maybe wearing 3 inch heeled shoes?
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7277
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by Oiky »

Tyson is back and will go from strength to strength, last night just a little warm up after losing all the weight and that there
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by Cyclops »

martinmrts wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 11:44 in what way is Tyson Fury a Mack, exactly ?
I've never understood that either. I always thought I was missing something.
Sklar wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 13:25 Here's one for you. Ronal McIntosh claims to be 6'9" tall. Tyson Fury is listed as 6'9" tall. I've never thought he's quite that tall. In boxing boots you're always going to be disadvantaged versus street shoes but....observe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmBqfEX3DM
Eagle eyed boxrecers may have noticed that Tyson was billed as 6'8.5" last night. He must have shrunk.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by samwbr »

Big Ron is about 7 foot+ if Tyson is 6'9"
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

martinmrts wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 11:44 in what way is Tyson Fury a Mack, exactly ?
I know, what the fck is that about?
Tommyscc
Lightweight
Posts: 64
Joined: 17 Feb 2018, 07:17

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by Tommyscc »

ShadrachSimmo wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 15:00
martinmrts wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 11:44 in what way is Tyson Fury a Mack, exactly ?
I know, what the fck is that about?
Return of the Mack??
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by bigjack »

Sklar wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 13:25 Here's one for you. Ronal McIntosh claims to be 6'9" tall. Tyson Fury is listed as 6'9" tall. I've never thought he's quite that tall. In boxing boots you're always going to be disadvantaged versus street shoes but....observe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmBqfEX3DM
Tyson does appear to be looking up at him at times,difficult to say for sure though.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by Tuan_Jim »

Fun fight, went pretty much as expected. Shame he picked such a weak comeback opponent but at least Seferi is more competent than Peter McNeeley or Conor McGregor. The clowning around tickled me--reminded me of Ali's antics in his less important fights. Which I suppose means that last night there was... Shades of Ali.

Anyway glad the fat gippo's back from the wilderness--any chance he could direct Ron McIntosh to it? Boxing broadcasts could do without his fat-tongued jabbering for a few years.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by Tuan_Jim »

samwbr wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 14:58 Big Ron is about 7 foot+ if Tyson is 6'9"
Or the canvas doesn't sink so much under Ron's weight
smiling assassin
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3225
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by smiling assassin »

Fury against Klitschko was far from a boxing masterclass but he did win the fight and it was quite clear cut. Joshua went life and death with him albeit in a completely different manner, and some say That makes Joshua the man. Let’s see what Tyson is like in 12 months time and then these 2 can settle it. That’s if Joshua has still got them belts and wilder hasn’t gatecrasged the party
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23118
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by mickey1975 »

Tuan_Jim wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 15:13 Fun fight, went pretty much as expected. Shame he picked such a weak comeback opponent but at least Seferi is more competent than Peter McNeeley or Conor McGregor. The clowning around tickled me--reminded me of Ali's antics in his less important fights. Which I suppose means that last night there was... Shades of Ali.

Anyway glad the fat gippo's back from the wilderness--any chance he could direct Ron McIntosh to it? Boxing broadcasts could do without his fat-tongued jabbering for a few years.
Bad form, that.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by Tuan_Jim »

Didn't realise you were a Ron Mac fan, Mickey. In fact I didn't realise Ron had fans at all.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45235
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: The Mack is Back

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Taansend wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 11:36 Dear Deirdre

I am a 43 year old man from Oop North who is obsessed with a giant who lives in a tiny caravan.

It's affecting my personal life to such a degree that I can't stop thinking or talking about him.

Please help!

Michael.

Hahahaha! Cruel but hilarious, im cackling like a witch who just spoilt her neighbours milk.
Post Reply