Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
He never rematched him DESPITE being offered over $30 million, which was unheard of money in those times... He wanted NO PART of Vitali, especially after he harpooned Kirk Johnson in two rounds.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
Lewis was past his best by then and retired,he knew he was on the slide and could possibly lose the rematch so chose not too,however Vitali got his chance and failed,it's not like Lennox got lucky,he took all of Vitali's best shots and came from behind to win,simple as thatHomicideHenry wrote: ↑17 Aug 2018, 15:00 He never rematched him DESPITE being offered over $30 million, which was unheard of money in those times... He wanted NO PART of Vitali, especially after he harpooned Kirk Johnson in two rounds.
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
Win? He was behind on all scorecards. He may have "won" but he didn't beat him. His refusal of a rematch when he said he would, was evidence enough.
-
Punchy Joe
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 319
- Joined: 25 Feb 2007, 10:17
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
Lewis is just an average social player at chess, He wouldn’t even be good enough to beat a lower end club player.
I've seen some of his games, he plays like a poor central park hustler, truly awful. Vitali beat him easily before their first fight (At Chess that is lol).
I've seen some of his games, he plays like a poor central park hustler, truly awful. Vitali beat him easily before their first fight (At Chess that is lol).
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
'He may have won but he didn't beat him' ? so he lost then ? god some people are so bitter after all these years,i always though that in boxing the idea was to hit the other guy in the face or body and cause damage so he couldn't continue,maybe i got that wrongHomicideHenry wrote: ↑17 Aug 2018, 18:01 Win? He was behind on all scorecards. He may have "won" but he didn't beat him. His refusal of a rematch when he said he would, was evidence enough.
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
Win is the same as won.HomicideHenry wrote: ↑17 Aug 2018, 18:01 Win? He was behind on all scorecards. He may have "won" but he didn't beat him. His refusal of a rematch when he said he would, was evidence enough.
If he took his best shots, was behind on the cards and still managed to produce the uppercut from hell and bust vitalis face wider than the grand canyon. I'd say he won the fight. Which means he did win the fight.
I guess Carl froch lost to Jermaine Taylor?
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
lewis vs klit might be the most rehashed fight of the last 20 years, how many times has there been this same f@cking argument
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
Hot Chocolate will have to come up with a new title for their hit song ' you win again',maybe they could call it 'you win again,but you didn't win really,however it says win on my record' ,not sure it would catch on reallynitro5912 wrote: ↑18 Aug 2018, 06:15Win is the same as won.HomicideHenry wrote: ↑17 Aug 2018, 18:01 Win? He was behind on all scorecards. He may have "won" but he didn't beat him. His refusal of a rematch when he said he would, was evidence enough.
If he took his best shots, was behind on the cards and still managed to produce the uppercut from hell and bust vitalis face wider than the grand canyon. I'd say he won the fight. Which means he did win the fight.
I guess Carl froch lost to Jermaine Taylor?
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9004
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
Have the Queensbury Rules been updated, whereby a fighter has to he ahead on the scorecards at the time he forces a stoppage too?HomicideHenry wrote: ↑17 Aug 2018, 18:01 Win? He was behind on all scorecards. He may have "won" but he didn't beat him. His refusal of a rematch when he said he would, was evidence enough.
The refusal of a mythical rematch is a red herring & has nothing to do with the result of their actual fight.
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
Boring isn’t it.
Had it continued Vitali would have ended up damaged for life. That was as bad a cut as I’ve ever seen, not to mention he had cuts in his mouth too and was swallowing blood.
I don’t know what these supposed fans want.
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
ya i dont understand how so many people think otherwise, the mans face was falling off and the tide had clearly turned
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
Just looking back at the photos, he has five different cuts around the eye and that’s ignoring the cuts in his mouth.
Madness to want him to be allowed to continue.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9004
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
..as a Klitschko fan, I've always said the stoppage was legit..period
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
Says the man who made every excuse under the sun to avoid fighting a total bum.HomicideHenry wrote: ↑17 Aug 2018, 15:00 He never rematched him DESPITE being offered over $30 million, which was unheard of money in those times... He wanted NO PART of Vitali, especially after he harpooned Kirk Johnson in two rounds.
Get a life you sadsack.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
Trailerpark logic in effect. It's practically metaphysical.Syntax Error wrote: ↑19 Aug 2018, 03:16Have the Queensbury Rules been updated, whereby a fighter has to he ahead on the scorecards at the time he forces a stoppage too?HomicideHenry wrote: ↑17 Aug 2018, 18:01 Win? He was behind on all scorecards. He may have "won" but he didn't beat him. His refusal of a rematch when he said he would, was evidence enough.
The refusal of a mythical rematch is a red herring & has nothing to do with the result of their actual fight.
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
The referee should have let the fight continue, eventually Vitali would have forced the stoppage, he was wearing down Lewis’ hands with his face...
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
You know what, you're right, another 28 rounds, and Lewis would have had two stumps where his hands used to be.
Of course by then Vitali's face would have been smeared all over the canvas, but that's no reason to stop the fight.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
It would have been far better if Vitali had continued until he was so badly cut that he had to retire,at least he would have been able to talk to his kids about it in years to come.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
Better how?
He may well have not been able to fight again if he continued, but in any case, no way should any fighter with cuts that bad be allowed to carry on.
http://www.mightyfighter.com/wp-content ... -eye-2.jpg
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
James i was being sarcastic,having a dig at Homicidejamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑19 Aug 2018, 16:35Better how?
He may well have not been able to fight again if he continued, but in any case, no way should any fighter with cuts that bad be allowed to carry on.
http://www.mightyfighter.com/wp-content ... -eye-2.jpg
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
Ahhh...ooops.bigjack wrote: ↑19 Aug 2018, 16:37James i was being sarcastic,having a dig at Homicidejamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑19 Aug 2018, 16:35Better how?
He may well have not been able to fight again if he continued, but in any case, no way should any fighter with cuts that bad be allowed to carry on.
http://www.mightyfighter.com/wp-content ... -eye-2.jpg![]()
You really must try harder.
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
This thread is epic
Vitali lost, just move on
Vitali lost, just move on
Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained
tbf, it seems this thread is being kept alive by ppl saying vitali lost 
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight
