Is Keith Thurman in for a year and out for a year ?
Is Keith Thurman in for a year and out for a year ?
I saw a recent interview with Keith Thurman and he explained himself well.
His injuries, future plans and over all well being for himself were points he covered.
But unless I'm misunderstanding he has literally no intentions [Based on boxing twice a year starting in 2019] of facing any of the top 3 fighters at Welterweight anytime soon.
His injuries, future plans and over all well being for himself were points he covered.
But unless I'm misunderstanding he has literally no intentions [Based on boxing twice a year starting in 2019] of facing any of the top 3 fighters at Welterweight anytime soon.
Re: Is Keith Thurman in for a year and out for a year ?
No Spence
No Crawford
No Porter 2
No Crawford
No Porter 2
Re: Is Keith Thurman in for a year and out for a year ?
Why would he? He's coming off an injury and a long layoff, ffs.
Re: Is Keith Thurman in for a year and out for a year ?
Thurman is a non-factor until further notice.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9008
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Is Keith Thurman in for a year and out for a year ?
I like Thurman, but even before his injuries, he lived up to his nickname, 'one time', as he usually only ever fought one time a year.
If he doesn't get back soon and fighting regularly, the WW division will pass him by, which is a shame, because he should be the main man at 147, with all roads leading to him.
If he doesn't get back soon and fighting regularly, the WW division will pass him by, which is a shame, because he should be the main man at 147, with all roads leading to him.
Re: Is Keith Thurman in for a year and out for a year ?
I would take Spence and Crawford over a healthy Thurman right now. He would be on the Porter / Garcia / Vargas level, which is nothing to be ashamed of.Syntax Error wrote: ↑21 Sep 2018, 10:32 I like Thurman, but even before his injuries, he lived up to his nickname, 'one time', as he usually only ever fought one time a year.
If he doesn't get back soon and fighting regularly, the WW division will pass him by, which is a shame, because he should be the main man at 147, with all roads leading to him.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Is Keith Thurman in for a year and out for a year ?
Based on what I’ve read, Keith Thurman could potentially make his ring return, which will inevitably be against relatively easy opposition, before the year end.
However, things aren’t looking good for ‘One Time’, since he’s only competed in two bouts within the last three years and by the time he does return, he’ll be an injury-prone fighter in his thirties.
I suspect that Thurman will need a couple of warm-up bouts prior to considering engaging in fights against any of his PBC top-tier 147lbs stablemates (i.e. Garcia, Porter, Spence Jr. etc.).
As we’ve already seen with the likes of David Haye, inactive fighters in their thirties that are seriously injury prone, are rarely able to regain their peak form of old when they do make their ring return.
However, things aren’t looking good for ‘One Time’, since he’s only competed in two bouts within the last three years and by the time he does return, he’ll be an injury-prone fighter in his thirties.
I suspect that Thurman will need a couple of warm-up bouts prior to considering engaging in fights against any of his PBC top-tier 147lbs stablemates (i.e. Garcia, Porter, Spence Jr. etc.).
As we’ve already seen with the likes of David Haye, inactive fighters in their thirties that are seriously injury prone, are rarely able to regain their peak form of old when they do make their ring return.
Re: Is Keith Thurman in for a year and out for a year ?
Good analysis.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑21 Sep 2018, 11:23 Based on what I’ve read, Keith Thurman could potentially make his ring return, which will inevitably be against relatively easy opposition, before the year end.
However, things aren’t looking good for ‘One Time’, since he’s only competed in two bouts within the last three years and by the time he does return, he’ll be an injury-prone fighter in his thirties.
I suspect that Thurman will need a couple of warm-up bouts prior to considering engaging in fights against any of his PBC top-tier 147lbs stablemates (i.e. Garcia, Porter, Spence Jr. etc.).
As we’ve already seen with the likes of David Haye, inactive fighters in their thirties that are seriously injury prone, are rarely able to regain their peak form of old when they do make their ring return.
Re: Is Keith Thurman in for a year and out for a year ?
I think Keith Thurman is in the early stages of becoming David Haye.
Re: Is Keith Thurman in for a year and out for a year ?
Thurman seems to have lost his fighting heart. I'll be picking against him the next time he's facing a Live opponent.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9008
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Is Keith Thurman in for a year and out for a year ?
Good point.ironbeard wrote: ↑21 Sep 2018, 10:55I would take Spence and Crawford over a healthy Thurman right now. He would be on the Porter / Garcia / Vargas level, which is nothing to be ashamed of.Syntax Error wrote: ↑21 Sep 2018, 10:32 I like Thurman, but even before his injuries, he lived up to his nickname, 'one time', as he usually only ever fought one time a year.
If he doesn't get back soon and fighting regularly, the WW division will pass him by, which is a shame, because he should be the main man at 147, with all roads leading to him.
The WW division is stacked to the gills and has been for a while.
Re: Is Keith Thurman in for a year and out for a year ?
Yeah, of course, we should see him back first, but something tells me, he won't handle neither Porter nor Garcia again, and I'm not even talking about Crawford with Spence.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9443
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Is Keith Thurman in for a year and out for a year ?
Well with only 12 responses to this topic not only has Thurman lost his desire to fight.
But it appears that we have all lost our interest in Thurman.
Sad the guy looked to have a bright future
But it appears that we have all lost our interest in Thurman.
Sad the guy looked to have a bright future
-
SenorPipino
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6055
- Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40
Re: Is Keith Thurman in for a year and out for a year ?
Maybe because he continues to promise a comeback since late last year, and nothing pans out.tiny_acres wrote: ↑24 Sep 2018, 12:28 Well with only 12 responses to this topic not only has Thurman lost his desire to fight.
But it appears that we have all lost our interest in Thurman.
Sad the guy looked to have a bright future
We're no longer paying attention to Thurman's talk and promises until something concrete shapes up.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9443
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Is Keith Thurman in for a year and out for a year ?
I agree. He just needs to get in the ringSenorPipino wrote: ↑25 Sep 2018, 14:46Maybe because he continues to promise a comeback since late last year, and nothing pans out.tiny_acres wrote: ↑24 Sep 2018, 12:28 Well with only 12 responses to this topic not only has Thurman lost his desire to fight.
But it appears that we have all lost our interest in Thurman.
Sad the guy looked to have a bright future
We're no longer paying attention to Thurman's talk and promises until something concrete shapes up.