https://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/1 ... ght-clause
It looks like Hearn's getting his way, but I'm not sure how I feel about the rehydration clause limiting Brook to 157lbs fight night.
2 weigh-ins?
Is Kell Brook conceding too much? (again).
Or is he just over-confident? (again).
If this goes ahead a real tough night will await both men.
Khan v Brook - Rehydration Clause?
-
Thomastearns
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2402
- Joined: 26 Feb 2017, 11:11
-
darkstar81
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 390
- Joined: 15 Apr 2005, 19:52
Re: Khan v Brook - Rehydration Clause?
I honestly favour Khan. I think he has more left in him.
Re: Khan v Brook - Rehydration Clause?
i favor brook, i think hell be able to time khan and khan isnt a super strong physical guy to grind him down like ggg and spence were, not to mention those two were elite world class with far better chins then khan
but the funny thing
it was khan would made the comeback, and yet despite the inactivity and him needing the 'comeback' label hes still got more recent activity then brook. brooks career has been a bit frustrating to say the least
but the funny thing
it was khan would made the comeback, and yet despite the inactivity and him needing the 'comeback' label hes still got more recent activity then brook. brooks career has been a bit frustrating to say the least
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101314
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Khan v Brook - Rehydration Clause?
Would have been good to see him fight again this year, or at least when he was supposed to.