Khan v Brook - Rehydration Clause?

Post Reply
Thomastearns
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2402
Joined: 26 Feb 2017, 11:11

Khan v Brook - Rehydration Clause?

Post by Thomastearns »

https://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/1 ... ght-clause

It looks like Hearn's getting his way, but I'm not sure how I feel about the rehydration clause limiting Brook to 157lbs fight night.

2 weigh-ins?

Is Kell Brook conceding too much? (again).

Or is he just over-confident? (again).

If this goes ahead a real tough night will await both men.
darkstar81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 15 Apr 2005, 19:52

Re: Khan v Brook - Rehydration Clause?

Post by darkstar81 »

Yep
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Khan v Brook - Rehydration Clause?

Post by BitPlayer »

I honestly favour Khan. I think he has more left in him.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Khan v Brook - Rehydration Clause?

Post by jamamb »

i favor brook, i think hell be able to time khan and khan isnt a super strong physical guy to grind him down like ggg and spence were, not to mention those two were elite world class with far better chins then khan

but the funny thing

it was khan would made the comeback, and yet despite the inactivity and him needing the 'comeback' label hes still got more recent activity then brook. brooks career has been a bit frustrating to say the least
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101314
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Khan v Brook - Rehydration Clause?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

jamamb wrote: 10 Oct 2018, 14:43 it was khan would made the comeback, and yet despite the inactivity and him needing the 'comeback' label hes still got more recent activity then brook. brooks career has been a bit frustrating to say the least
Would have been good to see him fight again this year, or at least when he was supposed to.
Post Reply