Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16921
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Parker got about 35% ok he had the belt but Fury is a much bigger name, all involved will earn a fortune the PPV will break records in the UK, tickets will be double the usual, Fury should get at least 40%.
MasterG
Lightweight
Posts: 7635
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 16:45

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by MasterG »

Would Fury give his purse to charity again? If so I think AJ should honour a 50-50 split knowing that the money Fury would earn would be going to good causes. How much cash does AJ want after he retires anyway?
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28516
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by Coco »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:13 Parker got about 35% ok he had the belt but Fury is a much bigger name, all involved will earn a fortune the PPV will break records in the UK, tickets will be double the usual, Fury should get at least 40%.
Martin got big bucks too, but both because Hearn thought they were straightforward fights so they were willing to buy the belts.
With Fury there is everything to lose and little to win, it will only be worth it for the Hearns if they are getting the lions share of the purse.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16921
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Coco wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:32
Nightmare Roy wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:13 Parker got about 35% ok he had the belt but Fury is a much bigger name, all involved will earn a fortune the PPV will break records in the UK, tickets will be double the usual, Fury should get at least 40%.
Martin got big bucks too, but both because Hearn thought they were straightforward fights so they were willing to buy the belts.
With Fury there is everything to lose and little to win, it will only be worth it for the Hearns if they are getting the lions share of the purse.
Maybe but if AJ doesn't fight either Wilder or Fury soon, the public will turn against him.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28516
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by Coco »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:36
Coco wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:32
Nightmare Roy wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:13 Parker got about 35% ok he had the belt but Fury is a much bigger name, all involved will earn a fortune the PPV will break records in the UK, tickets will be double the usual, Fury should get at least 40%.
Martin got big bucks too, but both because Hearn thought they were straightforward fights so they were willing to buy the belts.
With Fury there is everything to lose and little to win, it will only be worth it for the Hearns if they are getting the lions share of the purse.
Maybe but if AJ doesn't fight either Wilder or Fury soon, the public will turn against him.
I can see Hearn stretching it out for another year, defend against Whyte, Pulev and Miller, then he will take Fury or Wilder, preferably if one has just lost badly, when the fight can no longer be resisted and also when it will make the most money
Pukka Cheese
Super Lightweight
Posts: 441
Joined: 31 Mar 2017, 15:06

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by Pukka Cheese »

I dont think they can negotiate with Fury.

If there is a disagreement about money he will be on twitter demanding bareknuckle in a car park or on terrestrial tv as part of charity event. :lol:
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by ewenhay »

Pukka Cheese wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 11:44 I dont think they can negotiate with Fury.

If there is a disagreement about money he will be on twitter demanding bareknuckle in a car park or on terrestrial tv as part of charity event. :lol:
Yeah and trying to lowball him into saying no if they don't really want the fight might backfire too. He might just take it.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17072
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by keithmoonhangover »

If Fury wants 50% and wouldn't take the fight at say 40%, then he is the only greedy one in this equation. He told Eddie a while back he wanted 60% and to walk in last. I like both guys, but sanity has to prevail.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10163
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by samwbr »

MasterG wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:22 Would Fury give his purse to charity again? If so I think AJ should honour a 50-50 split knowing that the money Fury would earn would be going to good causes. How much cash does AJ want after he retires anyway?
Again? :roll:
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by HomicideHenry »

Fury will take the low-ball offer if Hearn offers the fight. There'll be no bluffing from Fury. This isn't about money for Fury. Besides the bulk of the money comes from PPV buys, not purse.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103272
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Coco wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:32
Nightmare Roy wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:13 Parker got about 35% ok he had the belt but Fury is a much bigger name, all involved will earn a fortune the PPV will break records in the UK, tickets will be double the usual, Fury should get at least 40%.
Martin got big bucks too, but both because Hearn thought they were straightforward fights so they were willing to buy the belts.
With Fury there is everything to lose and little to win, it will only be worth it for the Hearns if they are getting the lions share of the purse.
Hearn said before Parker fight that he’s always overpaid AJ’s opponents more than they should have gotten. It’s all about the money with these guys.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28516
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by Coco »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 18:55
Coco wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:32
Nightmare Roy wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:13 Parker got about 35% ok he had the belt but Fury is a much bigger name, all involved will earn a fortune the PPV will break records in the UK, tickets will be double the usual, Fury should get at least 40%.
Martin got big bucks too, but both because Hearn thought they were straightforward fights so they were willing to buy the belts.
With Fury there is everything to lose and little to win, it will only be worth it for the Hearns if they are getting the lions share of the purse.
Hearn said before Parker fight that he’s always overpaid AJ’s opponents more than they should have gotten. It’s all about the money with these guys.
So he is going to overpay Fury?
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by leejonesjnr »

MasterG wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:22 Would Fury give his purse to charity again?
Seen any news of that happening?
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by Covfefe »

leejonesjnr wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 20:29
MasterG wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:22 Would Fury give his purse to charity again?
Seen any news of that happening?
Has he done that before? Missed it if he did.
sharpei_louis
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 644
Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 08:30

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by sharpei_louis »

keithmoonhangover wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 16:31 If Fury wants 50% and wouldn't take the fight at say 40%, then he is the only greedy one in this equation. He told Eddie a while back he wanted 60% and to walk in last. I like both guys, but sanity has to prevail.
This.

Easy for guys to talk about someone else giving up millions out if pride or some bizarre fairness, or for gratitude to Fury for beating Klitschko first (???).

Wilder throws out £50m offers then takes his next fight for £4m, Wilder hasn't earneearned £50m in his career so that's just cloud cuckoo stuff.

Funny how easy it is for Fury and Wilder to fight each other for much less but when the cash cow walks in they all want as big a piece of it as they can get but manage to make it look like the other side being greedy!
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103272
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Coco wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 20:27
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 18:55
Coco wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:32

Martin got big bucks too, but both because Hearn thought they were straightforward fights so they were willing to buy the belts.
With Fury there is everything to lose and little to win, it will only be worth it for the Hearns if they are getting the lions share of the purse.
Hearn said before Parker fight that he’s always overpaid AJ’s opponents more than they should have gotten. It’s all about the money with these guys.
So he is going to overpay Fury?
What he meant was.. he’s done it in the past and he doesn’t like doing it and doesn’t want to do it.
MasterG
Lightweight
Posts: 7635
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 16:45

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by MasterG »

leejonesjnr wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 20:29
MasterG wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:22 Would Fury give his purse to charity again?
Seen any news of that happening?
its been in the news and such that Fury was going to donate his £8m purse to homeless charities, didnt that happen?
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by leejonesjnr »

MasterG wrote: 07 Dec 2018, 05:34
leejonesjnr wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 20:29
MasterG wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:22 Would Fury give his purse to charity again?
Seen any news of that happening?
its been in the news and such that Fury was going to donate his £8m purse to homeless charities, didnt that happen?
I know he has said it.
He has said a lot of things that never happened.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by bripez »

leejonesjnr wrote: 07 Dec 2018, 17:10
MasterG wrote: 07 Dec 2018, 05:34
leejonesjnr wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 20:29

Seen any news of that happening?
its been in the news and such that Fury was going to donate his £8m purse to homeless charities, didnt that happen?
I know he has said it.
He has said a lot of things that never happened.
I think it changed to “some” of his purse - no amount was specified.
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by skanksta »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:36
Coco wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:32
Nightmare Roy wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:13 Parker got about 35% ok he had the belt but Fury is a much bigger name, all involved will earn a fortune the PPV will break records in the UK, tickets will be double the usual, Fury should get at least 40%.
Martin got big bucks too, but both because Hearn thought they were straightforward fights so they were willing to buy the belts.
With Fury there is everything to lose and little to win, it will only be worth it for the Hearns if they are getting the lions share of the purse.
Maybe but if AJ doesn't fight either Wilder or Fury soon, the public will turn against him.
And not only this, but...

Everyone keeps stating that AJ is the bigger draw, most popular etc. as if it's a fact. I don't get this.
Sure - he's doing the big numbers - but isn't that due to Fast Eddie being the Simon Cowell to his Jedward ?
Fury is fascinating, a huge personality and has fought on C5. AJ is certainly less liked on here.
With the Sky platform AJ is big news - but couldn't MatchRoom make more out of "THE GYPSY KING" ?

AJ is wanting Wilder first - that's a surprise... :roll:
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by leejonesjnr »

skanksta wrote: 07 Dec 2018, 17:28
Nightmare Roy wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:36
Coco wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:32

Martin got big bucks too, but both because Hearn thought they were straightforward fights so they were willing to buy the belts.
With Fury there is everything to lose and little to win, it will only be worth it for the Hearns if they are getting the lions share of the purse.
Maybe but if AJ doesn't fight either Wilder or Fury soon, the public will turn against him.
And not only this, but...

Everyone keeps stating that AJ is the bigger draw, most popular etc. as if it's a fact. I don't get this.
Sure - he's doing the big numbers - but isn't that due to Fast Eddie being the Simon Cowell to his Jedward ?
Fury is fascinating, a huge personality and has fought on C5. AJ is certainly less liked on here.
With the Sky platform AJ is big news - but couldn't MatchRoom make more out of "THE GYPSY KING" ?

AJ is wanting Wilder first - that's a surprise... :roll:
It is a fact.
Nothing wrong with the man with 3.5 belts wanting the last big belt.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by Stuarty »

leejonesjnr wrote: 07 Dec 2018, 17:47
skanksta wrote: 07 Dec 2018, 17:28
Nightmare Roy wrote: 06 Dec 2018, 09:36

Maybe but if AJ doesn't fight either Wilder or Fury soon, the public will turn against him.
And not only this, but...

Everyone keeps stating that AJ is the bigger draw, most popular etc. as if it's a fact. I don't get this.
Sure - he's doing the big numbers - but isn't that due to Fast Eddie being the Simon Cowell to his Jedward ?
Fury is fascinating, a huge personality and has fought on C5. AJ is certainly less liked on here.
With the Sky platform AJ is big news - but couldn't MatchRoom make more out of "THE GYPSY KING" ?

AJ is wanting Wilder first - that's a surprise... :roll:
It is a fact.
Nothing wrong with the man with 3.5 belts wanting the last big belt.
Yeah they've always said they want all the belts. Personally I'd rather see Fury v AJ but I think it'll be Wilder v Fury next summer. I can't see AJ fighting either of them in April.
oogiebe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by oogiebe »

Stuarty wrote: 07 Dec 2018, 17:52
leejonesjnr wrote: 07 Dec 2018, 17:47
skanksta wrote: 07 Dec 2018, 17:28

And not only this, but...

Everyone keeps stating that AJ is the bigger draw, most popular etc. as if it's a fact. I don't get this.
Sure - he's doing the big numbers - but isn't that due to Fast Eddie being the Simon Cowell to his Jedward ?
Fury is fascinating, a huge personality and has fought on C5. AJ is certainly less liked on here.
With the Sky platform AJ is big news - but couldn't MatchRoom make more out of "THE GYPSY KING" ?

AJ is wanting Wilder first - that's a surprise... :roll:
It is a fact.
Nothing wrong with the man with 3.5 belts wanting the last big belt.
Yeah they've always said they want all the belts. Personally I'd rather see Fury v AJ but I think it'll be Wilder v Fury next summer. I can't see AJ fighting either of them in April.
I like the idea of AJ getting iced out of a fight with either two. Hearn believes he has the power and I'm sick of Hearn.
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by skanksta »

That's not really what I'm asking Lee.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Hearn (Barry) says no to 50/50 split AJ/Fury

Post by Stuarty »

oogiebe wrote: 07 Dec 2018, 17:54
Stuarty wrote: 07 Dec 2018, 17:52
leejonesjnr wrote: 07 Dec 2018, 17:47

It is a fact.
Nothing wrong with the man with 3.5 belts wanting the last big belt.
Yeah they've always said they want all the belts. Personally I'd rather see Fury v AJ but I think it'll be Wilder v Fury next summer. I can't see AJ fighting either of them in April.
I like the idea of AJ getting iced out of a fight with either two. Hearn believes he has the power and I'm sick of Hearn.
Yeah I'm the same mate :TU:

I don't think Hearn had any plans of fighting either next anyway right enough....
Post Reply