Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
-
OH_RickNMorty
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 92
- Joined: 09 Oct 2018, 17:50
Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
Smith and Golovkin meet at 165 LBS.
Both from their last performances — (Smith V Groves) & (Golovkin V Alvarez 2).
Statistics:
SMITH
6’ 3” (Height)
165 LBS (Weight)
78” (Reach)
GOLOVKIN
5’ 10” (Height)
165 LBS (Weight)
70” (Reach)
Callum Smith take the win in my opinion, due to the height and reach (08”!) advantages. Golovkin struggles to land big punches on Smith, and he gets caught with a good right, which ends the fight in the mid rounds.
Both from their last performances — (Smith V Groves) & (Golovkin V Alvarez 2).
Statistics:
SMITH
6’ 3” (Height)
165 LBS (Weight)
78” (Reach)
GOLOVKIN
5’ 10” (Height)
165 LBS (Weight)
70” (Reach)
Callum Smith take the win in my opinion, due to the height and reach (08”!) advantages. Golovkin struggles to land big punches on Smith, and he gets caught with a good right, which ends the fight in the mid rounds.
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
Chances are if this were to ever happen Golovkin would just have made the full on jump to 168 pounds. I think he's gonna continue on as a Middleweight for now, but I think a fight between him and Callum would be real interesting.
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
smith would reck him
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
i voted Golovkin, to be honest i do not rate current 168 division fighters too high.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9436
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
Smith's talent compared to Golovkin's is like Bellew's compared to Usyk's.
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
Harsh but true!boxing_rocks wrote: ↑11 Dec 2018, 16:41 Smith's talent compared to Golovkin's is like Bellew's compared to Usyk's.
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
smith is f@cking huge though, bellew wasnt compared to bellew, smith is very talented himself too
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
He is, no doubt, 6;3 is pretty tall for a SM, but I like GGG. I said the comp was harsh, but in pure skills, it's true. AT this point though, GGG's age may be a factor.
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
It'll translate. He dropped Kovalev in sparring.oogiebe wrote: ↑11 Dec 2018, 17:07Also, not really certain how GGG's power translates to another 8lbs.
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
Great fight, tough to call.
2 years ago GGG, now I feel Smith would be a bit too young, too fresh and with a BIG size advantage.
He has a big size advantage @ SMW (Groves looked small ?) and GGG is a small MW.
Smith can be a stiff plodder at times. If I was to pick a MW to beat him it would be Danny Jacobs - smooth mover.
(Or Canelo on points of course
)
2 years ago GGG, now I feel Smith would be a bit too young, too fresh and with a BIG size advantage.
He has a big size advantage @ SMW (Groves looked small ?) and GGG is a small MW.
Smith can be a stiff plodder at times. If I was to pick a MW to beat him it would be Danny Jacobs - smooth mover.
(Or Canelo on points of course
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
Golovkin was also dominating Groves in sparring and hurt him to the body.
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
Sparring is meaningless.. Smith took groves out in 7, so bad example anyway. I'd like to see this fight.boxing_rocks wrote: ↑11 Dec 2018, 17:41 Golovkin was also dominating Groves in sparring and hurt him to the body.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
Froch took undefeated Groves out twice and then refused to fight GGG.oogiebe wrote: ↑11 Dec 2018, 17:44Sparring is meaningless.. Smith took groves out in 7, so bad example anyway. I'd like to see this fight.boxing_rocks wrote: ↑11 Dec 2018, 17:41 Golovkin was also dominating Groves in sparring and hurt him to the body.
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
Interesting fight. The tough kickboxer nicky Hol took Smith to 12. Smith is a lhw and would have a lot of confidence after groves. Does he have the savvy to handle the golovkin pressure.
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
Four/Five years ago was a prime GGG.boxing_rocks wrote: ↑11 Dec 2018, 17:48Froch took undefeated Groves out twice and then refused to fight GGG.oogiebe wrote: ↑11 Dec 2018, 17:44Sparring is meaningless.. Smith took groves out in 7, so bad example anyway. I'd like to see this fight.boxing_rocks wrote: ↑11 Dec 2018, 17:41 Golovkin was also dominating Groves in sparring and hurt him to the body.
-
sharpei_louis
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 643
- Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 08:30
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
Two or three years ago I'd have gone GGG on smart pressure but I think GGG has got progressively easier to hit as his feet and reflexes aren't what they were..
Smith is a big hitter, still improving and absolutely massive. I honestly think he'd win a bruising encounter with a late stoppage and after we'd all recognise GGG as being past his prime.
Smith is a big hitter, still improving and absolutely massive. I honestly think he'd win a bruising encounter with a late stoppage and after we'd all recognise GGG as being past his prime.
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
165 lbs would be hard for Smith to make, but at 168lbs I'd expect Smith to win a very tough and entertaining fight.
There are plenty of good fights for GGG at smw.
There are plenty of good fights for GGG at smw.
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
Froch retired, you could argue he 'refused' to fight Degale more so than GGG.boxing_rocks wrote: ↑11 Dec 2018, 17:48Froch took undefeated Groves out twice and then refused to fight GGG.oogiebe wrote: ↑11 Dec 2018, 17:44Sparring is meaningless.. Smith took groves out in 7, so bad example anyway. I'd like to see this fight.boxing_rocks wrote: ↑11 Dec 2018, 17:41 Golovkin was also dominating Groves in sparring and hurt him to the body.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
What makes you suggest that Carl Froch refused to face James DeGale?keirw wrote: ↑12 Dec 2018, 04:40Froch retired, you could argue he 'refused' to fight Degale more so than GGG.boxing_rocks wrote: ↑11 Dec 2018, 17:48Froch took undefeated Groves out twice and then refused to fight GGG.
I'm not sure it's even accurate to suggest that Froch "refused" to face GGG either, since the man from Nottingham was a retired fighter when the discussions took place and the terms of the bout weren't agreed (i.e. the weight). The Brit was the A-side and the B-side didn't agree to the terms.
People aren't trying to rewrite history, surely? Come one lads, let's see your proof.
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
boxing_rocks wrote: ↑11 Dec 2018, 16:41 Smith's talent compared to Golovkin's is like Bellew's compared to Usyk's.
Ggg would lay waste to Smith.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
If a bout ever happened between Smith and GGG, the Kazakh would rightly be ridiculed for proposing a 165lbs catchweight, based on his own refusal to face smaller men at catchweights, coupled with his own criticism of other fighters that enagage in bouts that aren't competed at the standard weights.OH_RickNMorty wrote: ↑11 Dec 2018, 15:55 Smith and Golovkin meet at 165 LBS.
Both from their last performances — (Smith V Groves) & (Golovkin V Alvarez 2).
Statistics:
SMITH
6’ 3” (Height)
165 LBS (Weight)
78” (Reach)
GOLOVKIN
5’ 10” (Height)
165 LBS (Weight)
70” (Reach)
Callum Smith take the win in my opinion, due to the height and reach (08”!) advantages. Golovkin struggles to land big punches on Smith, and he gets caught with a good right, which ends the fight in the mid rounds.
Re: Callum Smith V Gennady Golovkin
I'm not accusing Froch of avoiding anyone, I was just using Degale as an example of a realistic fight that didn't happen due to his reyirement, as appose to the GGG fight that was never really on the cards.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑12 Dec 2018, 04:59What makes you suggest that Carl Froch refused to face James DeGale?keirw wrote: ↑12 Dec 2018, 04:40Froch retired, you could argue he 'refused' to fight Degale more so than GGG.boxing_rocks wrote: ↑11 Dec 2018, 17:48
Froch took undefeated Groves out twice and then refused to fight GGG.
I'm not sure it's even accurate to suggest that Froch "refused" to face GGG either, since the man from Nottingham was a retired fighter when the discussions took place and the terms of the bout weren't agreed (i.e. the weight). The Brit was the A-side and the B-side didn't agree to the terms.
People aren't trying to rewrite history, surely? Come one lads, let's see your proof.![]()
My point was more that he didn't refuse to fight GGG because he was scared (which the poster had tried to imply), but that he simply retired and there were other far more realistic candidates who also missed out on fighting him.