pulev vs wlad

Post Reply
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

pulev vs wlad

Post by jamamb »

whys only the ibf there? pulev only paid the ibf fee but didnt wlad pay all the fees for the belts to have them on the line?

is it because the ibf was the only fee they both paid?
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: pulev vs wlad

Post by claudevsq »

I think I remember Wlad defended all of his belts against Pulev. Super WBA, Super WBO, IBF, IBO, ''The Ring''... :maybe:
SteveO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1381
Joined: 31 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: pulev vs wlad

Post by SteveO »

Klitschko was defending all his titles but Pulev could only have won the IBF and RING belts because of his refusal to pay the WBA, WBO and IBO sanctioning fees.
The WBA, WBO and IBO titles would have been declared vacant had Pulev won the contest.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: pulev vs wlad

Post by jamamb »

i see the other belts have now been added back in there records, i think thats how it should be, there can just be a note in the wiki

thx :salut:
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: pulev vs wlad

Post by claudevsq »

SteveO is right, I just wanted to write the exact same thing. I added the belts back... There are also notes in the fight's wiki, by the way. :TU:
Post Reply