whys only the ibf there? pulev only paid the ibf fee but didnt wlad pay all the fees for the belts to have them on the line?
is it because the ibf was the only fee they both paid?
pulev vs wlad
Re: pulev vs wlad
I think I remember Wlad defended all of his belts against Pulev. Super WBA, Super WBO, IBF, IBO, ''The Ring''... 
Re: pulev vs wlad
Klitschko was defending all his titles but Pulev could only have won the IBF and RING belts because of his refusal to pay the WBA, WBO and IBO sanctioning fees.
The WBA, WBO and IBO titles would have been declared vacant had Pulev won the contest.
The WBA, WBO and IBO titles would have been declared vacant had Pulev won the contest.
Re: pulev vs wlad
i see the other belts have now been added back in there records, i think thats how it should be, there can just be a note in the wiki
thx
thx
Re: pulev vs wlad
SteveO is right, I just wanted to write the exact same thing. I added the belts back... There are also notes in the fight's wiki, by the way. 
