The referee was Steve Willis. Has he ever made early stoppages? I don't remember that, cause if he even has, that's not the most memorable stuff about him.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 16:51 Lopez has said had it been him in the 7th taking the punishment, the fight would likely have been stopped.
Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019
Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019
Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019
X2oogiebe wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 16:54I can believe that.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 16:51 Lopez has said had it been him in the 7th taking the punishment, the fight would likely have been stopped.
-
SenorPipino
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6055
- Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40
Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019
Fighters always say that, trying to argue that the A side gets special privileges.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 16:51 Lopez has said had it been him in the 7th taking the punishment, the fight would likely have been stopped.
All I know is that Thurman survived it and came back and won.
The referee made the right call in not halting it. If he had, people would be screaning that it was premature.
Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019
None of which changes the fact that Josesito’s claim is legitimate. Whether or not the ref should have stopped it is not his point.SenorPipino wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 20:24Fighters always say that, trying to argue that the A side gets special privileges.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 16:51 Lopez has said had it been him in the 7th taking the punishment, the fight would likely have been stopped.
All I know is that Thurman survived it and came back and won.
The referee made the right call in not halting it. If he had, people would be screaning that it was premature.
Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019
Yeah, 'ole bug eye Willis is pretty good.DrDuke wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 16:57The referee was Steve Willis. Has he ever made early stoppages? I don't remember that, cause if he even has, that's not the most memorable stuff about him.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 16:51 Lopez has said had it been him in the 7th taking the punishment, the fight would likely have been stopped.![]()
-
Best Coast
- Welterweight
- Posts: 3133
- Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53
Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019
Thurman needs to work on clinching when he's hurt. His inability to do that almost cost him that fight!!
Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019
Lopez’s claim is garbage. Thurman was throwing back while all this was happening and the fight never reached the point where a stoppage was worthy.ironbeard wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 23:17None of which changes the fact that Josesito’s claim is legitimate. Whether or not the ref should have stopped it is not his point.SenorPipino wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 20:24Fighters always say that, trying to argue that the A side gets special privileges.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 16:51 Lopez has said had it been him in the 7th taking the punishment, the fight would likely have been stopped.
All I know is that Thurman survived it and came back and won.
The referee made the right call in not halting it. If he had, people would be screaning that it was premature.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23043
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019
No doubt it was a torrid round for Thurman, even worse than the one against Collazo for me but the fact is Lopez's chance had been and gone before the round was even out, Thurman finished it back in the driving seatcaldo2025 wrote: ↑28 Jan 2019, 15:44Lopez’s claim is garbage. Thurman was throwing back while all this was happening and the fight never reached the point where a stoppage was worthy.ironbeard wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 23:17None of which changes the fact that Josesito’s claim is legitimate. Whether or not the ref should have stopped it is not his point.SenorPipino wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 20:24
Fighters always say that, trying to argue that the A side gets special privileges.
All I know is that Thurman survived it and came back and won.
The referee made the right call in not halting it. If he had, people would be screaning that it was premature.
Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019
Maybe, but not without a reason. Thurman can hit a lot harder that Lopez.oogiebe wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 16:54I can believe that.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 16:51 Lopez has said had it been him in the 7th taking the punishment, the fight would likely have been stopped.
Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019
I think it all goes back Thurman punching himself out after the knock down. I knew that output was going to come back to haunt him. I think Thurman was more gassed than hurt but he chose not to admit it. He went hard after that KO and it wasn’t the kind of knockdown that warranted that approach. I could be wrong but I felt Lopez was more off balance than hurt from that left.handsofstone wrote: ↑28 Jan 2019, 16:21No doubt it was a torrid round for Thurman, even worse than the one against Collazo for me but the fact is Lopez's chance had been and gone before the round was even out, Thurman finished it back in the driving seat
Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019
Easy for Lopez to make the claim. Easier for you to wave it off as garbage.caldo2025 wrote: ↑28 Jan 2019, 15:44Lopez’s claim is garbage. Thurman was throwing back while all this was happening and the fight never reached the point where a stoppage was worthy.ironbeard wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 23:17None of which changes the fact that Josesito’s claim is legitimate. Whether or not the ref should have stopped it is not his point.SenorPipino wrote: ↑27 Jan 2019, 20:24
Fighters always say that, trying to argue that the A side gets special privileges.
All I know is that Thurman survived it and came back and won.
The referee made the right call in not halting it. If he had, people would be screaning that it was premature.
Fights (especially in the UK) have been stopped for less.
We will never know if Lopez’s claim would have been accurate. He has every right to make it though.
Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019
We do know it’s not accurate bc one of the best refs happened to be working the fight not some dope in the UK that just got his license. I’ll take his opinion over yours every time.ironbeard wrote: ↑29 Jan 2019, 07:57Easy for Lopez to make the claim. Easier for you to wave it off as garbage.
Fights (especially in the UK) have been stopped for less.
We will never know if Lopez’s claim would have been accurate. He has every right to make it though.
Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019
I can see his point only because if Lopez was hurt as much as Thurman was, the ref takes into account the ability of the fighter to put away the fighter and ability of the hurt fighter to withstand. So maybe.caldo2025 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2019, 11:25We do know it’s not accurate bc one of the best refs happened to be working the fight not some dope in the UK that just got his license. I’ll take his opinion over yours every time.
Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019
Lopez made a claim. The ref (apparently) claims the opposite. Neither has any evidence to back their claims. Believe whatever you choose. Your belief does not preclude the possibility that Lopez is correct.caldo2025 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2019, 11:25We do know it’s not accurate bc one of the best refs happened to be working the fight not some dope in the UK that just got his license. I’ll take his opinion over yours every time.
Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019
Lopez was referring to all of those fights against the elite in which the fight was waved off against him. Thurman was not nearly as hurt as Lopez was in those fights so it’s a dumb comment. Not even close. Dumb commentironbeard wrote: ↑29 Jan 2019, 11:35Lopez made a claim. The ref (apparently) claims the opposite. Neither has any evidence to back their claims. Believe whatever you choose. Your belief does not preclude the possibility that Lopez is correct.