Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019

Who wins?

Poll ended at 26 Jan 2019, 13:41

Thurman - Decision
9
33%
Thurman - K/TKO
16
59%
DRAW
1
4%
Lopez - K/TKO
1
4%
Lopez - Decision
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 27

DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019

Post by DrDuke »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 16:51 Lopez has said had it been him in the 7th taking the punishment, the fight would likely have been stopped.
The referee was Steve Willis. Has he ever made early stoppages? I don't remember that, cause if he even has, that's not the most memorable stuff about him. :D
ironbeard
Super Featherweight
Posts: 17189
Joined: 15 Sep 2018, 20:00

Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019

Post by ironbeard »

oogiebe wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 16:54
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 16:51 Lopez has said had it been him in the 7th taking the punishment, the fight would likely have been stopped.
I can believe that.
X2
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019

Post by SenorPipino »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 16:51 Lopez has said had it been him in the 7th taking the punishment, the fight would likely have been stopped.
Fighters always say that, trying to argue that the A side gets special privileges.

All I know is that Thurman survived it and came back and won.

The referee made the right call in not halting it. If he had, people would be screaning that it was premature.
ironbeard
Super Featherweight
Posts: 17189
Joined: 15 Sep 2018, 20:00

Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019

Post by ironbeard »

SenorPipino wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 20:24
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 16:51 Lopez has said had it been him in the 7th taking the punishment, the fight would likely have been stopped.
Fighters always say that, trying to argue that the A side gets special privileges.

All I know is that Thurman survived it and came back and won.

The referee made the right call in not halting it. If he had, people would be screaning that it was premature.
None of which changes the fact that Josesito’s claim is legitimate. Whether or not the ref should have stopped it is not his point.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26503
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019

Post by KiwiRider »

DrDuke wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 16:57
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 16:51 Lopez has said had it been him in the 7th taking the punishment, the fight would likely have been stopped.
The referee was Steve Willis. Has he ever made early stoppages? I don't remember that, cause if he even has, that's not the most memorable stuff about him. :D
Yeah, 'ole bug eye Willis is pretty good.
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019

Post by Best Coast »

Thurman needs to work on clinching when he's hurt. His inability to do that almost cost him that fight!!
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019

Post by caldo2025 »

ironbeard wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 23:17
SenorPipino wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 20:24
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 16:51 Lopez has said had it been him in the 7th taking the punishment, the fight would likely have been stopped.
Fighters always say that, trying to argue that the A side gets special privileges.

All I know is that Thurman survived it and came back and won.

The referee made the right call in not halting it. If he had, people would be screaning that it was premature.
None of which changes the fact that Josesito’s claim is legitimate. Whether or not the ref should have stopped it is not his point.
Lopez’s claim is garbage. Thurman was throwing back while all this was happening and the fight never reached the point where a stoppage was worthy.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23043
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019

Post by handsofstone »

caldo2025 wrote: 28 Jan 2019, 15:44
ironbeard wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 23:17
SenorPipino wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 20:24

Fighters always say that, trying to argue that the A side gets special privileges.

All I know is that Thurman survived it and came back and won.

The referee made the right call in not halting it. If he had, people would be screaning that it was premature.
None of which changes the fact that Josesito’s claim is legitimate. Whether or not the ref should have stopped it is not his point.
Lopez’s claim is garbage. Thurman was throwing back while all this was happening and the fight never reached the point where a stoppage was worthy.
No doubt it was a torrid round for Thurman, even worse than the one against Collazo for me but the fact is Lopez's chance had been and gone before the round was even out, Thurman finished it back in the driving seat
Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3483
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019

Post by Cent0089 »

oogiebe wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 16:54
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 16:51 Lopez has said had it been him in the 7th taking the punishment, the fight would likely have been stopped.
I can believe that.
Maybe, but not without a reason. Thurman can hit a lot harder that Lopez.
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019

Post by caldo2025 »

handsofstone wrote: 28 Jan 2019, 16:21
caldo2025 wrote: 28 Jan 2019, 15:44
ironbeard wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 23:17
None of which changes the fact that Josesito’s claim is legitimate. Whether or not the ref should have stopped it is not his point.
Lopez’s claim is garbage. Thurman was throwing back while all this was happening and the fight never reached the point where a stoppage was worthy.
No doubt it was a torrid round for Thurman, even worse than the one against Collazo for me but the fact is Lopez's chance had been and gone before the round was even out, Thurman finished it back in the driving seat
I think it all goes back Thurman punching himself out after the knock down. I knew that output was going to come back to haunt him. I think Thurman was more gassed than hurt but he chose not to admit it. He went hard after that KO and it wasn’t the kind of knockdown that warranted that approach. I could be wrong but I felt Lopez was more off balance than hurt from that left.
ironbeard
Super Featherweight
Posts: 17189
Joined: 15 Sep 2018, 20:00

Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019

Post by ironbeard »

caldo2025 wrote: 28 Jan 2019, 15:44
ironbeard wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 23:17
SenorPipino wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 20:24

Fighters always say that, trying to argue that the A side gets special privileges.

All I know is that Thurman survived it and came back and won.

The referee made the right call in not halting it. If he had, people would be screaning that it was premature.
None of which changes the fact that Josesito’s claim is legitimate. Whether or not the ref should have stopped it is not his point.
Lopez’s claim is garbage. Thurman was throwing back while all this was happening and the fight never reached the point where a stoppage was worthy.
Easy for Lopez to make the claim. Easier for you to wave it off as garbage.

Fights (especially in the UK) have been stopped for less.

We will never know if Lopez’s claim would have been accurate. He has every right to make it though.
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019

Post by caldo2025 »

ironbeard wrote: 29 Jan 2019, 07:57
caldo2025 wrote: 28 Jan 2019, 15:44
ironbeard wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 23:17
None of which changes the fact that Josesito’s claim is legitimate. Whether or not the ref should have stopped it is not his point.
Lopez’s claim is garbage. Thurman was throwing back while all this was happening and the fight never reached the point where a stoppage was worthy.
Easy for Lopez to make the claim. Easier for you to wave it off as garbage.

Fights (especially in the UK) have been stopped for less.

We will never know if Lopez’s claim would have been accurate. He has every right to make it though.
We do know it’s not accurate bc one of the best refs happened to be working the fight not some dope in the UK that just got his license. I’ll take his opinion over yours every time.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019

Post by oogiebe »

caldo2025 wrote: 29 Jan 2019, 11:25
ironbeard wrote: 29 Jan 2019, 07:57
caldo2025 wrote: 28 Jan 2019, 15:44

Lopez’s claim is garbage. Thurman was throwing back while all this was happening and the fight never reached the point where a stoppage was worthy.
Easy for Lopez to make the claim. Easier for you to wave it off as garbage.

Fights (especially in the UK) have been stopped for less.

We will never know if Lopez’s claim would have been accurate. He has every right to make it though.
We do know it’s not accurate bc one of the best refs happened to be working the fight not some dope in the UK that just got his license. I’ll take his opinion over yours every time.
I can see his point only because if Lopez was hurt as much as Thurman was, the ref takes into account the ability of the fighter to put away the fighter and ability of the hurt fighter to withstand. So maybe. :maybe:
ironbeard
Super Featherweight
Posts: 17189
Joined: 15 Sep 2018, 20:00

Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019

Post by ironbeard »

caldo2025 wrote: 29 Jan 2019, 11:25
ironbeard wrote: 29 Jan 2019, 07:57
caldo2025 wrote: 28 Jan 2019, 15:44

Lopez’s claim is garbage. Thurman was throwing back while all this was happening and the fight never reached the point where a stoppage was worthy.
Easy for Lopez to make the claim. Easier for you to wave it off as garbage.

Fights (especially in the UK) have been stopped for less.

We will never know if Lopez’s claim would have been accurate. He has every right to make it though.
We do know it’s not accurate bc one of the best refs happened to be working the fight not some dope in the UK that just got his license. I’ll take his opinion over yours every time.
Lopez made a claim. The ref (apparently) claims the opposite. Neither has any evidence to back their claims. Believe whatever you choose. Your belief does not preclude the possibility that Lopez is correct.
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Keith Thurman vs. Josesito López - January 26, 2019

Post by caldo2025 »

ironbeard wrote: 29 Jan 2019, 11:35
caldo2025 wrote: 29 Jan 2019, 11:25
ironbeard wrote: 29 Jan 2019, 07:57
Easy for Lopez to make the claim. Easier for you to wave it off as garbage.

Fights (especially in the UK) have been stopped for less.

We will never know if Lopez’s claim would have been accurate. He has every right to make it though.
We do know it’s not accurate bc one of the best refs happened to be working the fight not some dope in the UK that just got his license. I’ll take his opinion over yours every time.
Lopez made a claim. The ref (apparently) claims the opposite. Neither has any evidence to back their claims. Believe whatever you choose. Your belief does not preclude the possibility that Lopez is correct.
Lopez was referring to all of those fights against the elite in which the fight was waved off against him. Thurman was not nearly as hurt as Lopez was in those fights so it’s a dumb comment. Not even close. Dumb comment
Post Reply