pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Best Coast »

Onetimeonly wrote: 25 Jan 2019, 22:00 In Duran's day casual fan wasn t even a term. Boxing was a massive sport.Many, many more millions of Americans watched Duran fight than Manny. Not even in the same vicinity.
We're not talking about the popularity of boxing in the 1970s vs the 2000s but the popularity of Duran vs Pacquiao with Americans. Just because boxing was less of a niche sport in the US than it is today doesnt make Duran more popular than Pacquiao. There were lots of Americans who watched Duran fights hoping he would lose. The 1970s was the last "golden age of boxing" in the US and happens to be when Duran was in his prime. Duran's US debut was his first world title fight, when he beat Buchanan in 1972. After he quit against Leonard in their rematch in 1980 with the "no mas" quit job. Duran became a laughing stock and his career hit a low point with a loss to a nobody named Kirkland Laing, which was Upset of the Year in 1982.

Do you honestly believe there were more than a handful of Americans who rooted for Duran in either fight against Sugar Ray Leonard? If you do, then you were obviously NOT a boxing fan back then or you didnt live in the US (maybe neither one).

When Pac fought Floyd a majority of Americans were pulling for Pac. More significantly when Pac fought very popular Oscar De La Hoya he had a huge number of Americans rooting for Pac to beat Oscar. I live in the southwest US, where a majority of fight fans are Latino/Hispanic (mostly Mexican) and Manny is hugely popular among Mexicans/Mex-Americans.

Roberto Duran was not even the most popular foreign athlete of the 1970s in the US. That distinction belonged to Brazilian soccer great Pele, who led the NY Cosmos team to the NASL Championship in 1977 (after retiring from the Brazilian National team in the early 70s).
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Onetimeonly »

Best Coast wrote: 25 Jan 2019, 23:40
Onetimeonly wrote: 25 Jan 2019, 22:00 In Duran's day casual fan wasn t even a term. Boxing was a massive sport.Many, many more millions of Americans watched Duran fight than Manny. Not even in the same vicinity.
We're not talking about the popularity of boxing in the 1970s vs the 2000s but the popularity of Duran vs Pacquiao with Americans. Just because boxing was less of a niche sport in the US than it is today doesnt make Duran more popular than Pacquiao. There were lots of Americans who watched Duran fights hoping he would lose. The 1970s was the last "golden age of boxing" in the US and happens to be when Duran was in his prime. Duran's US debut was his first world title fight, when he beat Buchanan in 1972. After he quit against Leonard in their rematch in 1980 with the "no mas" quit job. Duran became a laughing stock and his career hit a low point with a loss to a nobody named Kirkland Laing, which was Upset of the Year in 1982.

Do you honestly believe there were more than a handful of Americans who rooted for Duran in either fight against Sugar Ray Leonard? If you do, then you were obviously NOT a boxing fan back then or you didnt live in the US (maybe neither one).

When Pac fought Floyd a majority of Americans were pulling for Pac. More significantly when Pac fought very popular Oscar De La Hoya he had a huge number of Americans rooting for Pac to beat Oscar. I live in the southwest US, where a majority of fight fans are Latino/Hispanic (mostly Mexican) and Manny is hugely popular among Mexicans/Mex-Americans.

Roberto Duran was not even the most popular foreign athlete of the 1970s in the US. That distinction belonged to Brazilian soccer great Pele, who led the NY Cosmos team to the NASL Championship in 1977 (after retiring from the Brazilian National team in the early 70s).
The popularity of boxing in the times is directly related to the question. Absolutely there were many Americans cheering for Duran. I was one of them. Leonard was more popular than both combined, so again your point falls short.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Onetimeonly »

You might want to think about federer and nadal too.
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Best Coast »

Onetimeonly wrote: 26 Jan 2019, 13:18
Best Coast wrote: 25 Jan 2019, 23:40
Onetimeonly wrote: 25 Jan 2019, 22:00 In Duran's day casual fan wasn t even a term. Boxing was a massive sport.Many, many more millions of Americans watched Duran fight than Manny. Not even in the same vicinity.
We're not talking about the popularity of boxing in the 1970s vs the 2000s but the popularity of Duran vs Pacquiao with Americans. Just because boxing was less of a niche sport in the US than it is today doesnt make Duran more popular than Pacquiao. There were lots of Americans who watched Duran fights hoping he would lose. The 1970s was the last "golden age of boxing" in the US and happens to be when Duran was in his prime. Duran's US debut was his first world title fight, when he beat Buchanan in 1972. After he quit against Leonard in their rematch in 1980 with the "no mas" quit job. Duran became a laughing stock and his career hit a low point with a loss to a nobody named Kirkland Laing, which was Upset of the Year in 1982.

Do you honestly believe there were more than a handful of Americans who rooted for Duran in either fight against Sugar Ray Leonard? If you do, then you were obviously NOT a boxing fan back then or you didnt live in the US (maybe neither one).

When Pac fought Floyd a majority of Americans were pulling for Pac. More significantly when Pac fought very popular Oscar De La Hoya he had a huge number of Americans rooting for Pac to beat Oscar. I live in the southwest US, where a majority of fight fans are Latino/Hispanic (mostly Mexican) and Manny is hugely popular among Mexicans/Mex-Americans.

Roberto Duran was not even the most popular foreign athlete of the 1970s in the US. That distinction belonged to Brazilian soccer great Pele, who led the NY Cosmos team to the NASL Championship in 1977 (after retiring from the Brazilian National team in the early 70s).
The popularity of boxing in the times is directly related to the question. Absolutely there were many Americans cheering for Duran. I was one of them. Leonard was more popular than both combined, so again your point falls short.
You conveniently avoid the question of whether you were even a boxing fan during Duran's prime (the 1970s) or whether you were even living in America when you claim Duran was so "beloved" by American sports fans. Did you actually watch his televised fights when he was still active or did you just dredge up YouTube videos long after the fact?

I've heard many stories from older friends & relatives who actually went to see Joe Louis fight and tell me how Americans used to around gather around the radio to hear his fights before TV days. And I have watched videos of Louis' epic fights many decades later, but that's not the same as being around in the days it was actually happening. I admire and respect Louis but it's not like I can ever be a fan of his from the days when he is alive and fighting in his prime.

You said fans at MSG sang happy birthday after Duran "beat the poo out of a kid from the Bronx." The fact that you cannot even identify world jr middle champ Davey Moore by name sounds like you werent even around back then when that was one of Roberto's most epic fights!! That shows you probably werent plugged into the sport enough back then to know who Davey Moore was. Were you even alive back then or is the 1970/80s something you watched on the History Channel?

If you were a boxing fan back then, were you even living in the US then (or ever for that matter)? I'm not pompous enough to try lecturing British fans on who was the most popular foreign fighter in the UK in the 1970s (or whenever) because I didnt live there then and never have. So I dont have the personal experience with British boxing culture like someone who does live there, so I wont PRETEND that I do.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Onetimeonly »

:lol:
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by oogiebe »

Best Coast wrote: 26 Jan 2019, 20:18
Onetimeonly wrote: 26 Jan 2019, 13:18
Best Coast wrote: 25 Jan 2019, 23:40
We're not talking about the popularity of boxing in the 1970s vs the 2000s but the popularity of Duran vs Pacquiao with Americans. Just because boxing was less of a niche sport in the US than it is today doesnt make Duran more popular than Pacquiao. There were lots of Americans who watched Duran fights hoping he would lose. The 1970s was the last "golden age of boxing" in the US and happens to be when Duran was in his prime. Duran's US debut was his first world title fight, when he beat Buchanan in 1972. After he quit against Leonard in their rematch in 1980 with the "no mas" quit job. Duran became a laughing stock and his career hit a low point with a loss to a nobody named Kirkland Laing, which was Upset of the Year in 1982.

Do you honestly believe there were more than a handful of Americans who rooted for Duran in either fight against Sugar Ray Leonard? If you do, then you were obviously NOT a boxing fan back then or you didnt live in the US (maybe neither one).

When Pac fought Floyd a majority of Americans were pulling for Pac. More significantly when Pac fought very popular Oscar De La Hoya he had a huge number of Americans rooting for Pac to beat Oscar. I live in the southwest US, where a majority of fight fans are Latino/Hispanic (mostly Mexican) and Manny is hugely popular among Mexicans/Mex-Americans.

Roberto Duran was not even the most popular foreign athlete of the 1970s in the US. That distinction belonged to Brazilian soccer great Pele, who led the NY Cosmos team to the NASL Championship in 1977 (after retiring from the Brazilian National team in the early 70s).
The popularity of boxing in the times is directly related to the question. Absolutely there were many Americans cheering for Duran. I was one of them. Leonard was more popular than both combined, so again your point falls short.
You conveniently avoid the question of whether you were even a boxing fan during Duran's prime (the 1970s) or whether you were even living in America when you claim Duran was so "beloved" by American sports fans. Did you actually watch his televised fights when he was still active or did you just dredge up YouTube videos long after the fact?

I've heard many stories from older friends & relatives who actually went to see Joe Louis fight and tell me how Americans used to around gather around the radio to hear his fights before TV days. And I have watched videos of Louis' epic fights many decades later, but that's not the same as being around in the days it was actually happening. I admire and respect Louis but it's not like I can ever be a fan of his from the days when he is alive and fighting in his prime.

You said fans at MSG sang happy birthday after Duran "beat the poo out of a kid from the Bronx." The fact that you cannot even identify world jr middle champ Davey Moore by name sounds like you werent even around back then when that was one of Roberto's most epic fights!! That shows you probably werent plugged into the sport enough back then to know who Davey Moore was. Were you even alive back then or is the 1970/80s something you watched on the History Channel?

If you were a boxing fan back then, were you even living in the US then (or ever for that matter)? I'm not pompous enough to try lecturing British fans on who was the most popular foreign fighter in the UK in the 1970s (or whenever) because I didnt live there then and never have. So I dont have the personal experience with British boxing culture like someone who does live there, so I wont PRETEND that I do.
I was and I did. Duran was very popular in the states. He fought on ABC a couple of times (Ray Lampkins fight was real good) and HBO as the decade came to close, and most of the folks I knew rooted for him against Leonard the first fight. Many non-boxing fans knew who he was and casuals absolutely knew him and watched his fights. It was during this time (especially at Lightweight up to his beating Leonard) that Duran's popularity rose. Boxing was huge during this period thanks to the HW's (Ali; Frazier; Norton; Foreman) but the lower weights were also enjoying immense popularity. I'd bet the views on his fights were pretty damn good too.
Thomastearns
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2402
Joined: 26 Feb 2017, 11:11

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Thomastearns »

Duran was certainly popular and respected here in Britain. Even when he lost to Kirkland Laing in '82, that was seen as an aberration, rather than something to boast about. Duran was obviously past it, not training etc.

Whereas Lloyd Honeyghan's win over the no less brilliant Don Curry was lauded to the skies.
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Best Coast »

oogiebe wrote: 27 Jan 2019, 14:14
Best Coast wrote: 26 Jan 2019, 20:18
You conveniently avoid the question of whether you were even a boxing fan during Duran's prime (the 1970s) or whether you were even living in America when you claim Duran was so "beloved" by American sports fans. Did you actually watch his televised fights when he was still active or did you just dredge up YouTube videos long after the fact?

I've heard many stories from older friends & relatives who actually went to see Joe Louis fight and tell me how Americans used to around gather around the radio to hear his fights before TV days. And I have watched videos of Louis' epic fights many decades later, but that's not the same as being around in the days it was actually happening. I admire and respect Louis but it's not like I can ever be a fan of his from the days when he is alive and fighting in his prime.

You said fans at MSG sang happy birthday after Duran "beat the poo out of a kid from the Bronx." The fact that you cannot even identify world jr middle champ Davey Moore by name sounds like you werent even around back then when that was one of Roberto's most epic fights!! That shows you probably werent plugged into the sport enough back then to know who Davey Moore was. Were you even alive back then or is the 1970/80s something you watched on the History Channel?

If you were a boxing fan back then, were you even living in the US then (or ever for that matter)? I'm not pompous enough to try lecturing British fans on who was the most popular foreign fighter in the UK in the 1970s (or whenever) because I didnt live there then and never have. So I dont have the personal experience with British boxing culture like someone who does live there, so I wont PRETEND that I do.
I was and I did. Duran was very popular in the states. He fought on ABC a couple of times (Ray Lampkins fight was real good) and HBO as the decade came to close, and most of the folks I knew rooted for him against Leonard the first fight. Many non-boxing fans knew who he was and casuals absolutely knew him and watched his fights. It was during this time (especially at Lightweight up to his beating Leonard) that Duran's popularity rose. Boxing was huge during this period thanks to the HW's (Ali; Frazier; Norton; Foreman) but the lower weights were also enjoying immense popularity. I'd bet the views on his fights were pretty damn good too.
Oogie...you've always been upfront about the fact you are American and have even pointed out you are from the northeastern US. I really appreciate you sharing your personal experience with Duran fans, as well as watching his fights when they happened. You are definitely correct when you point out that Duran's peak popularity in the was in his prime: from his lightweight days through the win over Leonard in June 1980. His nationally televised US debut vs world LW champ Ken Buchanan in June 1972 was his intro to casual American fans. So his peak popularity in the US was 8 years, from 1972-80. Like yourself, I've know many Duran fans over the years and I'm sure you'll agree that a large number of them lost massive respect for Roberto after the "No mas" quit job against SRL.

Living in the southwestern US (less than 10 miles from Mexican border) I was well aware that large number of Mexicans/Mex-Americans on both sides of the border were big Duran fans, with many claiming Duran as Mexican. His Mexican-American father was stationed in Panama with the US Army and left Panama before Roberto was even born. Hardly ANY of them were claiming Duran as Mexican after the "No mas" debacle, since quitting is considered disgraceful in Mexican culture. Even in Duran's native Panama, his "No Mas" was a tremendous national disgrace:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugar_Ray ... Post-fight
Durán's stature in his home country, Panama, took a dramatic dive after the fight. The immediate reaction was shock, followed by anger. Within hours, commercials featuring Durán (in both Panama and the United States) were ordered off the air.
I'm not saying Duran was not one of the more popular foreign-born boxers in the US because he was. But he was not as popular as Manny Pacquiao has been for the past decade, following Pac's breakthrough win over box-office superstar Oscar De La Hoya in late 2008. That's when millions of casuals became Pacman fans, even though Pac had large numbers of hardcore fans, well before that, following his US debut in 2001 (when he won his 3rd world title).

As a frequent commenter here at Current Scene, it's obvious you are very well-versed on the American boxing scene and have been for quite a while. I respect your opinion and do not question your credibility regarding the US boxing scene, but this sanctimonious troll "OTO" insists Duran was more popular in America than Manny has ever been. Yet he refuses to answer the simple question of whether if he has ever even lived in the US, let alone acknowledge where he IS from. That leads me to believe this troll has never even lived here, much less lived here during the time of Duran's prime and peak US popularity.

If you or I started lecturing Russian fans on who the most popular boxer in Russia is, we would be laughed at and justifiably so. Not having ever lived in Russia and personally interacted with Russian boxing fans we would have NO credibility on Russian boxing culture. I would never pretend to have a grasp on Russian boxing culture like I do with American or Mexican boxing culture...that would be ridiculous!!

In like manner I cannot take this guy OTO seriously because he wont even admit whether or not he was living in America during the period when he claims Duran was more popular in the US than Pacquiao has ever been.


Like yourself, I'm upfront about my biases and favorites, but this guy must be afraid to expose his biases/favoritism by admitting where he is from. We all have our biases and favorites but I'm suspicious of those who pretend to have objectivity or neutrality like this guy OTO does.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pay-per-v ... al_boxing)
The leading PPV attraction, Floyd Mayweather Jr. has generated approximately 24 million buys and $1.6 billion in revenue. Manny Pacquiao, ranked second, has generated approximately 19.2 million buys and $1.2 billion in revenue. Oscar De La Hoya, has "sold" approximately 14 million units in total, giving $700 million in domestic television receipts and stands third. In fourth place in buys, Evander Holyfield has achieved 12.6 million units ($550 million); and at fifth, Mike Tyson has reached 12.4 million units ($545 million).
Add another .4 million PPV buys for Pac-Broner and it brings Pac up to 19.6 million, 5 million above Oscar De La Hoya. Keep in mind that PPV buys are households not individuals and many fans have friends over to share the cost of the PPV. (I watched Pac-Floyd with about 15 people at my buddy's apartment, Pac-Oscar with about 12, Pac-Cotto with about 10, etc. Mexican-Americans usually have a party built around their PPVs.)

Pacquiao drew 50,994 into Cowboy Stadium vs Clottey & 41,734 vs Margarito.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT%26T_Stadium#Boxing

The Clottey fight crowd was DOUBLE Duran's best live attendance in the US, which was 25,038 for the "No Mas" fight in the Louisiana Superdome (where Ali-Spinks drew 65,000 in 1978).

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Rober ... d_meeting)
A crowd of 25,038 at the Superdome produced a gate of $3 million.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Onetimeonly »

Fights against guys like Gonzalez and minchillo likely were viewed by 10 million plus. You're not considering that. A higher percentage of boxing fans doesn't positively mean more fans.
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Best Coast »

Onetimeonly wrote: 28 Jan 2019, 09:23 Fights against guys like Gonzalez and minchillo likely were viewed by 10 million plus.
Ridiculous speculation that cannot be substantiated in any way. How ironic and ill-informed that you would pick 2 fights immediately after the "No Mas" fiasco that sent Duran's popularity into the toilet. Roberto's shameful quit job caused him to be disowned by multitudes of his fans, even back home in Panama:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugar_Ray ... Post-fight
Durán's stature in his home country, Panama, took a dramatic dive after the fight. The immediate reaction was shock, followed by anger. Within hours, commercials featuring Durán (in both Panama and the United States) were ordered off the air.
The well-documented numbers that we DO have are far more conclusive. The highest live attendance figures for their respective bouts here in the US:
Pacquiao drew 50,994 into AT&T Stadium vs Clottey & 41,734 vs Margarito.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT%26T_Stadium#Boxing

Joshua Clottey was a veritable nobody to casual fans but the Pac-Clottey live fight crowd was DOUBLE Duran's best live attendance in the US, a megafight rematch with one of America's most popular boxers of the past 60+ years, Sugar Ray Leonard. The Duran-Leonard megafight drew a paltry 25,038 fans in the Louisiana Superdome (where Ali-Spinks drew 65,000 in 1978).
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Rober ... d_meeting)
A crowd of 25,038 at the Superdome produced a gate of $3 million.
So Duran's all-time largest live crowd was November 1980, the Leonard rematch (aka "No Mas") with only HALF as many fans as Pac-Clottey was held at the Superdome, where Ali-Spinks II had packed 2.5 times as many live fans there just 2 years earlier.

Those undisputed live crowd numbers in Pacquiao's prime show that he was more popular than Duran was at the peak popularity of his prime, when he was coming off his win over SRL and riding a career-best 41-bout winning streak. It also demonstrates that the massive popularity of the HWs during Duran's prime did NOT trickle down to the other weight classes as much as you'd like to think.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Onetimeonly »

I picked those fights for a reason. That would be his least popular moment. You're mighty upset. :lol: there were only 4 channels on TV, boxing was way bigger than college football, golf and the nba. You can quote wiki all you want, you need to stop ignoring that if you want to look remotely objective about your one dimensional demand.
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 14015
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Evander »

Broner is soft
BroughtonRulesRefuge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2768
Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 06:55

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by BroughtonRulesRefuge »

Onetimeonly wrote: 25 Jan 2019, 22:00 In Duran's day casual fan wasn t even a term. Boxing was a massive sport.Many, many more millions of Americans watched Duran fight than Manny. Not even in the same vicinity.

- If blubber was brains, you'd have a 250 IQ.

If blubber is buttocks, that'd be the real you.

Never made it to the 3rd millennium, eh?
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by SenorPipino »

Bob Arum says that the fight didn't do anywhere close to 400,000 buys.

"It's nowhere's near there," Arum. believes.

Basically he reveals that when promoters report a PPV number, take it with a grain of salt.

I've always felt that way too. Only the promoters, the cable networks and the IRS know the real buy numbers.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Onetimeonly »

Why didn't you take a scorned promoters word with a grain of salt?
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Best Coast »

Onetimeonly wrote: 29 Jan 2019, 00:01 I picked those fights for a reason. That would be his least popular moment. You're mighty upset. :lol: there were only 4 channels on TV, boxing was way bigger than college football, golf and the nba. You can quote wiki all you want, you need to stop ignoring that if you want to look remotely objective about your one dimensional demand.
I agree...you DID pick the Minchillo & Gonzalez fights for a reason.

Because your ridiculous claim of 10 million viewers for them cannot be verified or substantiated in any way. That's why you get bent out of shape about my internet links, because they document the kind of facts and stats your subjective nonsense cannot substantiate. The only factual statement you've been able to dredge up is that "Duran fans at MSG sang 'happy birthday' after he beat some 'kid from the Bronx'. Any genuine American boxing fan who watched that fight when it happened would easily recognize him as WBA world champ Davey Moore, not some faceless "kid from the Bronx."

But your funniest gaffe is this one:
there were only 4 channels on TV :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
You obviously were not living in the US back then because by then there were already 28 nationally distributed Cable TV channels in the US, including HBO, ESPN, CNN, TBS, BET, CBN, USA, Showtime, etc, etc, etc.
https://www.ncta.com/cables-story

https://www.timetoast.com/timelines/31741
Jan 1, 1980 – Dec 30, 1999
20 Years of Channel Expansion

1980 - 28 cable channels
1990 - 79 cable channels
1995 - 139 cable channels
1998 - 171 cable channels
What country WERE you living in back when Duran hit his prime? Maybe the UK? Australia? Ireland? Obviously NOT the United States. So stop pretending to know how popular Roberto Duran was with American fans in his prime when you werent even living here at the time (if ever)!
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Onetimeonly »

:lol: if you think I'm reading or clicking any of that. I think you liked me better when I was saad!
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by punchoutsb »

Yeah SAAD, where were you living?! Somewhere foreign like Omaha perhaps? :lol:
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Onetimeonly »

punchoutsb wrote: 30 Jan 2019, 00:16 Yeah SAAD, where were you living?! Somewhere foreign like Omaha perhaps? :lol:
I definitely wasn't watching boxing on my 4 channels lin Baltimore like the 46 million that watched Holmes/shavers 2!
Last edited by Onetimeonly on 30 Jan 2019, 00:30, edited 1 time in total.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Onetimeonly »

Still wondering what rules out guys like federer, nadal, messi, Pele, McGregor, olajuwon, etc... I guess best coast knows best. He should write a wiki about it using only Manny stats. :lol:
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Best Coast »

Onetimeonly wrote: 30 Jan 2019, 00:19
punchoutsb wrote: 30 Jan 2019, 00:16 Yeah SAAD, where were you living?! Somewhere foreign like Omaha perhaps? :lol:
I definitely wasn't watching boxing on my 4 channels lin Baltimore like the 46 million that watched Holmes/shavers 2!
I remember "Saad off the deck" and remember reading some good posts from you about a year or so ago. But I do NOT accept your overly generous claim that 46 MILLION watched Holmes-Shavers 2!! Back then a typical SUPER BOWL had a yearly TV audience of about 70 million TV viewers, so that 46 million sounds like something you grabbed out of thin air. There's gotta be some article, website or report you could provide a link to if you are gonna make outrageous claims like that. Sports history is well-documented on the Internet..

I looked for a link that could either refute or confirm that 46 million viewers claim and couldnt find anything. Feel free to do the same thing...
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by punchoutsb »

Best Coast wrote: 30 Jan 2019, 20:19
Onetimeonly wrote: 30 Jan 2019, 00:19
punchoutsb wrote: 30 Jan 2019, 00:16 Yeah SAAD, where were you living?! Somewhere foreign like Omaha perhaps? :lol:
I definitely wasn't watching boxing on my 4 channels lin Baltimore like the 46 million that watched Holmes/shavers 2!
I remember "Saad off the deck" and remember reading some good posts from you about a year or so ago. But I do NOT accept your overly generous claim that 46 MILLION watched Holmes-Shavers 2!! Back then a typical SUPER BOWL had a yearly TV audience of about 70 million TV viewers, so that 46 million sounds like something you grabbed out of thin air. There's gotta be some article, website or report you could provide a link to if you are gonna make outrageous claims like that. Sports history is well-documented on the Internet..

I looked for a link that could either refute or confirm that 46 million viewers claim and couldnt find anything. Feel free to do the same thing...
https://www.boxinginsider.com/columns/b ... t-paydirt/
In September 1979, Holmes and Shavers (with Roberto Duran and Sugar Ray Leonard in separate bouts on the undercard) drew 46 million viewers in what was an entertaining rematch, highlighted by a knockdown scored by Shavers in the seventh round.
It took me about 10 seconds to find this.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by oogiebe »

punchoutsb wrote: 30 Jan 2019, 20:38
Best Coast wrote: 30 Jan 2019, 20:19
Onetimeonly wrote: 30 Jan 2019, 00:19

I definitely wasn't watching boxing on my 4 channels lin Baltimore like the 46 million that watched Holmes/shavers 2!
I remember "Saad off the deck" and remember reading some good posts from you about a year or so ago. But I do NOT accept your overly generous claim that 46 MILLION watched Holmes-Shavers 2!! Back then a typical SUPER BOWL had a yearly TV audience of about 70 million TV viewers, so that 46 million sounds like something you grabbed out of thin air. There's gotta be some article, website or report you could provide a link to if you are gonna make outrageous claims like that. Sports history is well-documented on the Internet..

I looked for a link that could either refute or confirm that 46 million viewers claim and couldnt find anything. Feel free to do the same thing...
https://www.boxinginsider.com/columns/b ... t-paydirt/
In September 1979, Holmes and Shavers (with Roberto Duran and Sugar Ray Leonard in separate bouts on the undercard) drew 46 million viewers in what was an entertaining rematch, highlighted by a knockdown scored by Shavers in the seventh round.
It took me about 10 seconds to find this.
I was surprised to see the viewership for Leonard vs Dave Boy Green drew 55 million. Those were the days!
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by punchoutsb »

oogiebe wrote: 30 Jan 2019, 20:43
punchoutsb wrote: 30 Jan 2019, 20:38
Best Coast wrote: 30 Jan 2019, 20:19
I remember "Saad off the deck" and remember reading some good posts from you about a year or so ago. But I do NOT accept your overly generous claim that 46 MILLION watched Holmes-Shavers 2!! Back then a typical SUPER BOWL had a yearly TV audience of about 70 million TV viewers, so that 46 million sounds like something you grabbed out of thin air. There's gotta be some article, website or report you could provide a link to if you are gonna make outrageous claims like that. Sports history is well-documented on the Internet..

I looked for a link that could either refute or confirm that 46 million viewers claim and couldnt find anything. Feel free to do the same thing...
https://www.boxinginsider.com/columns/b ... t-paydirt/
In September 1979, Holmes and Shavers (with Roberto Duran and Sugar Ray Leonard in separate bouts on the undercard) drew 46 million viewers in what was an entertaining rematch, highlighted by a knockdown scored by Shavers in the seventh round.
It took me about 10 seconds to find this.
I was surprised to see the viewership for Leonard vs Dave Boy Green drew 55 million. Those were the days!
I have no idea where these numbers came from, but I needed a break from my comp exam and this thread was at the top :OhYes:
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: pac vs broner over 400k us ppv buys

Post by Best Coast »

punchoutsb wrote: 30 Jan 2019, 20:38
Best Coast wrote: 30 Jan 2019, 20:19
Onetimeonly wrote: 30 Jan 2019, 00:19

I definitely wasn't watching boxing on my 4 channels lin Baltimore like the 46 million that watched Holmes/shavers 2!
I remember "Saad off the deck" and remember reading some good posts from you about a year or so ago. But I do NOT accept your overly generous claim that 46 MILLION watched Holmes-Shavers 2!! Back then a typical SUPER BOWL had a yearly TV audience of about 70 million TV viewers, so that 46 million sounds like something you grabbed out of thin air. There's gotta be some article, website or report you could provide a link to if you are gonna make outrageous claims like that. Sports history is well-documented on the Internet..

I looked for a link that could either refute or confirm that 46 million viewers claim and couldnt find anything. Feel free to do the same thing...
https://www.boxinginsider.com/columns/b ... t-paydirt/
In September 1979, Holmes and Shavers (with Roberto Duran and Sugar Ray Leonard in separate bouts on the undercard) drew 46 million viewers in what was an entertaining rematch, highlighted by a knockdown scored by Shavers in the seventh round.
It took me about 10 seconds to find this.
Great article. That was a great fight. I'm bookmarking Boxing Insider on my Favorites list!! :TU:
Post Reply