I had Adonis winning too. Doesn’t mean he actually won the fight. It was close but by no means a clear close win for either. One dominated in the first half, the other in the second half.
Fact is. The bout the a draw.
I had Adonis winning too. Doesn’t mean he actually won the fight. It was close but by no means a clear close win for either. One dominated in the first half, the other in the second half.
They are my words. You are obviously clueless about the nature of boxing and records. We can count early defeats, but they generally aren't counted to mean anything. There was a forum post making fun of idiots like yourself where we called guys legends because they defeated a HoF or ATG extremely early in their careers.oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 14:50Um, you said (see bold) Undefeated lineal Titlist. Now you say his one defeat doesn't count because it was "a long time ago?" These are your words. You are either full of shvt or an absolute moron as you continually try to call out others with asinine posts such as these.
Mexi-Box wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 16:07They are my words. You are obviously clueless about the nature of boxing and records. We can count early defeats, but they generally aren't counted to mean anything. There was a forum post making fun of idiots like yourself where we called guys legends because they defeated a HoF or ATG extremely early in their careers.oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 14:50Um, you said (see bold) Undefeated lineal Titlist. Now you say his one defeat doesn't count because it was "a long time ago?" These are your words. You are either full of shvt or an absolute moron as you continually try to call out others with asinine posts such as these.
And I'm not worng in the end. Stevenson has been undefeated for years at LHW.
I don't call out posters for things like this. I'm too educated on this sport to look at something so trivial, and think I can one-up someone by correcting them when I know exactly what they mean. You're definitely one of the most clueless posters on this board, and worse yet, you are one of the most stubborn. Take time to educate yourself before you come at me.
Not really a fact. It's a fact that 3 judges saw that fight in that fashion, but going by this logic, it'd be like saying it's a fact that Brandon Rios beat Richard Abril or Wilder drew with Fury.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 15:30I had Adonis winning too. Doesn’t mean he actually won the fight. It was close but by no means a clear close win for either. One dominated in the first half, the other in the second half.
Fact is. The bout the a draw.
Exactly what I thought.oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 16:08Mexi-Box wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 16:07They are my words. You are obviously clueless about the nature of boxing and records. We can count early defeats, but they generally aren't counted to mean anything. There was a forum post making fun of idiots like yourself where we called guys legends because they defeated a HoF or ATG extremely early in their careers.oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 14:50
Um, you said (see bold) Undefeated lineal Titlist. Now you say his one defeat doesn't count because it was "a long time ago?" These are your words. You are either full of shvt or an absolute moron as you continually try to call out others with asinine posts such as these.
And I'm not worng in the end. Stevenson has been undefeated for years at LHW.
I don't call out posters for things like this. I'm too educated on this sport to look at something so trivial, and think I can one-up someone by correcting them when I know exactly what they mean. You're definitely one of the most clueless posters on this board, and worse yet, you are one of the most stubborn. Take time to educate yourself before you come at me.![]()
LMAO!Mexi-Box wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 16:12Exactly what I thought.oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 16:08Mexi-Box wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 16:07
They are my words. You are obviously clueless about the nature of boxing and records. We can count early defeats, but they generally aren't counted to mean anything. There was a forum post making fun of idiots like yourself where we called guys legends because they defeated a HoF or ATG extremely early in their careers.
And I'm not worng in the end. Stevenson has been undefeated for years at LHW.
I don't call out posters for things like this. I'm too educated on this sport to look at something so trivial, and think I can one-up someone by correcting them when I know exactly what they mean. You're definitely one of the most clueless posters on this board, and worse yet, you are one of the most stubborn. Take time to educate yourself before you come at me.![]()
![]()
How about arguing my point next time. Maybe I'll be a lot nicer if you can come at me from a rational perspective.
Again, exactly what I thought. No argument. I bet you cried as you typed this. I've never seen someone so shook before that they write like a blathering idiot, child. I left you looking like a moron now how about you let it go and stop responding unless you have something reasonable to offer, which is likely never going to happen.
OMG...you are hilarious! You are so predictable it's too easy. You insult and I push back with your own ridiculous quotes. Oh, you are frightful!Mexi-Box wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 16:24Again, exactly what I thought. No argument. I bet you cried as you typed this. I've never seen someone so shook before that they write like a blathering idiot, child. I left you looking like a moron now how about you let it go and stop responding unless you have something reasonable to offer, which is likely never going to happen.
Are you so stupid or can't read? I've already defended my position for all three. That's what this is all about? Go to those threads and read my posts (if you can still read). OMFG, you just threw yourself under the bus!oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 16:28OMG...you are hilarious! You are so predictable it's too easy. You insult and I push back with your own ridiculous quotes. Oh, you are frightful!Mexi-Box wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 16:24Again, exactly what I thought. No argument. I bet you cried as you typed this. I've never seen someone so shook before that they write like a blathering idiot, child. I left you looking like a moron now how about you let it go and stop responding unless you have something reasonable to offer, which is likely never going to happen.Explain Helenius having "dangerous power." or Gvozdyk "taking the division by storm." Yeah...just as I expected.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Bogdan Dinu!
Why in the world would I want to read those silly posts again? You defended nothing. You never do. You are best at picking apart other posters and adding little or no value yourself. I'm done here. Time for your nap, little man. Ciao! Thanks for the laughs.Mexi-Box wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 16:31Are you so stupid or can't read? I've already defended my position for all three. That's what this is all about? Go to those threads and read my posts (if you can still read). OMFG, you just threw yourself under the bus!oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 16:28OMG...you are hilarious! You are so predictable it's too easy. You insult and I push back with your own ridiculous quotes. Oh, you are frightful!Mexi-Box wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 16:24
Again, exactly what I thought. No argument. I bet you cried as you typed this. I've never seen someone so shook before that they write like a blathering idiot, child. I left you looking like a moron now how about you let it go and stop responding unless you have something reasonable to offer, which is likely never going to happen.Explain Helenius having "dangerous power." or Gvozdyk "taking the division by storm." Yeah...just as I expected.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Bogdan Dinu!
![]()
Not only are you so ignorant, you can't read. I'll stop now for the sake of this thread. If you want to keep going with your idiocy, just do it in a pm so you won't have to embarrass yourself anymore.
It will always be a draw in the books though. The three judges it what counts.Mexi-Box wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 16:08Not really a fact. It's a fact that 3 judges saw that fight in that fashion, but going by this logic, it'd be like saying it's a fact that Brandon Rios beat Richard Abril or Wilder drew with Fury.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 15:30I had Adonis winning too. Doesn’t mean he actually won the fight. It was close but by no means a clear close win for either. One dominated in the first half, the other in the second half.
Fact is. The bout the a draw.

I wonder if Bivol could make 168. He definitely doesn't look a division bigger than Benavidez.
Dunno about being taken out.
no doubt kiwi joes a tought boy, i just think joe will go for it , which could leave him open for a clean shot . but thats what i like about the joe he has a world title shot , and i think there is no doubt in his mind if he lands a big shot he could be champ ,gwan the irish bomberKiwiRider wrote: ↑01 Feb 2019, 21:37Dunno about being taken out.
Joe is a tough cookie. Don't forget he fought 6 rounds against Barrera with a broken jaw. Didn't quit, didn't moan, just.kept on trying. I'm not saying Joe is going to win, both Sean and Joe are going to lose on the night. Except I don't think Joe will be stopped.
He's probably too big a risk with relatively little reward for Canelo to go to 168 for. Smith vs Bivol would be great though.boxing_rocks wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019, 12:41He is willing to fight Smith and Canelo at 168.