John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
the question remains
benn knocked out mcclellan and barkley
what mugabi wins top this? hell, anything better then henry warton?
benn knocked out mcclellan and barkley
what mugabi wins top this? hell, anything better then henry warton?
Last edited by jamamb on 20 Feb 2019, 17:30, edited 1 time in total.
-
paddy chavez
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2678
- Joined: 13 Jun 2017, 08:08
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
And got ko'd by Watson,eubanks and collinsjamamb wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 17:26benn knocked out mclellan and barkley, ill just throw those twoAmbling Alp II wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 17:25That wasn't a beatdown loss to Hagler. He gave Hagler all Hagler could handle. Benn's victim list is not much more impressive than Mugabi's.
so what did mugabi do better then this? since we are mocking that benn is more accomplished....
mugabis was a decent but nothing special junior middle who always lost when he stepped up
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
ya, still couldnt be iced as many times as mugabi was though 
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
come on now, if people are gonna get testy at the suggestion that benns more accomplished, tell me how mugabis wins top benns
magubi has a bit of myth to him, so big and bad, yet actually a chinny junior middle with not a serious win to his name
magubi has a bit of myth to him, so big and bad, yet actually a chinny junior middle with not a serious win to his name
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
easy excuses
he never did anything notable before hagler either
he never did anything notable before hagler either
-
paddy chavez
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2678
- Joined: 13 Jun 2017, 08:08
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
mugabe fought an actual beast in mclellan and got iced in 1, benn knocked him out. lol hilarious that you keep acting like it doesnt count
mugabes like vitali klitschko, yet probably with even worse wins
mugabes like vitali klitschko, yet probably with even worse wins
-
paddy chavez
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2678
- Joined: 13 Jun 2017, 08:08
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
laughable
hell, then dont count wins where a guy lands the right punch and gets the ko instead of causing a cut
hell, then dont count wins where a guy lands the right punch and gets the ko instead of causing a cut
-
paddy chavez
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2678
- Joined: 13 Jun 2017, 08:08
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
i have, benn hurt mclellan with his fists, you know like what happens in boxing. benn whethered the storm and came back unlike mugabi
-
paddy chavez
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2678
- Joined: 13 Jun 2017, 08:08
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
Seriously Gerald was getting hurt by routine shots and near misses. It was tough to watch. Even the announcers were questioning it when he appeared to get stunned by less than stellar shots. He voluntarily went to one knee. How he was able to keep fighting and even hurt Benn was amazing to me.
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
thats what happens when a guy gets ground down
-
paddy chavez
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2678
- Joined: 13 Jun 2017, 08:08
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
You didn't even know who Logan was or what happenedoogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 17:46Seriously Gerald was getting hurt by routine shots and near misses. It was tough to watch. Even the announcers were questioning it when he appeared to get stunned by less than stellar shots. He voluntarily went to one knee. How he was able to keep fighting and even hurt Benn was amazing to me.
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
FFS the guy took a knee after being headbutted and was blinking his eyes in what the ninth??
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
If you're asking me, Benn was lucky to beat Logan, who practically had him out early.paddy chavez wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 17:48You didn't even know who Logan was or what happenedoogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 17:46Seriously Gerald was getting hurt by routine shots and near misses. It was tough to watch. Even the announcers were questioning it when he appeared to get stunned by less than stellar shots. He voluntarily went to one knee. How he was able to keep fighting and even hurt Benn was amazing to me.![]()
![]()
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9011
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
There's no revisionism re: Hagler's performance against Mugabi.Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 17:13I think a fighter can actually improve his stock legitimately with a loss. If he puts in a better than expected performance against a great fighter, then naturally his stock will go up.Syntax Error wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 15:18I get a bit nonplussed when people big up fighters on the back of defeats.
A similar thing happened with Razor Ruddock after his two defeats to Tyson: His stock somehow became enhanced.
This now appears to be the case with Mugabi who did fight well against Hagler, but like I have already said, a badly faded Hagler who had no speed left.
The Hagler of 1980 would have pulverised Mugabi pretty comfortably.
I'm still on the fence about Benn/Mugabi, but I can't see how him getting battered and stopped as a way of justifying picking him over Benn.
As for the Hagler fight-Few people was saying after the fight that Hagler looked bad. It was considered a great fight at the time. Mugabi held his own against Hagler and gave him a tough fight.
Only revisonist history has changed the narrative where Hagler was badly faded. He wasn't.
And Nigel Benn would not have been that competitive with Hagler in 1986.
Mugabi looked better than Benn in several fights before fighting Hagler.
He'd lost a ton of speed and it was his performance against Mugabi that convinced Leonard to come out of retirement and challenge him.
He was clearly on the slide, even if he was still formidable.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
yeah if you watc the Mugabi fight then say the Sibson or Obas fight the speed difference is almost shocking
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
Hagler did his back in quite badly in 1985, forcing the Mugabi fight to be postponed to 1986, Haggles was starting to fall apart.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9011
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
Seems that way.
He was a different beast after 1985.
He was still formidable; still had his conditioning and still had a chin for the ages, but in his fights with Mugabi and Leonard, he was woefully slow; much much slower than he had been previously.
I remember watching the Mugabi fight and watching him miss and turn right around and thinking Hagler is slow as f--k these days.
In hindsight, that was obviously the beginning of the end for him.
I'm so glad he didn't come back after Leonard, because even if he managed to beat Ray in a rematch, he would have probably been a sitting duck for the likes of Nunn and Toney et al going forward.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15182
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: John Mugabi versus Nigel Benn
Didn't hear anyone say anything at all about Hagler slipping after the Mugabi fight. The Mugabi-Hagler fight was considered a great fight at the time.
And Hagler was supposed to steam roll Leonard. Leonard thought he could beat Hagler, but few others did. Most experts were picking a slaughter. Never heard any talk of him slowing down.
And Hagler was supposed to steam roll Leonard. Leonard thought he could beat Hagler, but few others did. Most experts were picking a slaughter. Never heard any talk of him slowing down.