Joke Calzaghe! Seven Weeks Away and No Joe Foe!

Paul Powler
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 59
Joined: 30 Nov 2005, 09:49

Joke Calzaghe! Seven Weeks Away and No Joe Foe!

Post by Paul Powler »

7 weeks on Saturday and Joe Calzaghe will be fighting... errr... err.... beats me!!!! what the hell is the deal here??? Beyer... Joppy... Kessler... Mundine/Green winner... the Contender loser guy... Green, ... Miranda... Andrade... and now allegely Glen Johnson????? I've already got my tickets (fourth row! Hell yeah!) because of Skelton WilliamsII but this is embarrassing for Joe... didn't Warren ripp Hobson apart for not having a Ricky opponent nine weeks out? Didn'tWarren rip on Hobson for linking Hatton with all those names and not delivering them....in a DIRECT comparision with Hobson, Warren is already looking bad here... I mean, Joe is the udercard dude in his own backyard...
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Joke Calzaghe! Seven Weeks Away and No Joe Foe!

Post by pundit »

Paul Powler wrote:7 weeks on Saturday and Joe Calzaghe will be fighting... errr... err.... beats me!!!! what the hell is the deal here??? Beyer... Joppy... Kessler... Mundine/Green winner... the Contender loser guy... Green, ... Miranda... Andrade... and now allegely Glen Johnson????? I've already got my tickets (fourth row! Hell yeah!) because of Skelton WilliamsII but this is embarrassing for Joe... didn't Warren ripp Hobson apart for not having a Ricky opponent nine weeks out? Didn'tWarren rip on Hobson for linking Hatton with all those names and not delivering them....in a DIRECT comparision with Hobson, Warren is already looking bad here... I mean, Joe is the udercard dude in his own backyard...
As long as they get the choice right I'm happy to wait.
kevo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:30

Post by kevo »

Whoever could you have in ming Pundit? :wink:


I'd be interested to here what Boxingchat has to say on this subject.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

Kevo wrote:Whoever could you have in ming Pundit? :wink:


I'd be interested to here what Boxingchat has to say on this subject.
Hmmmmmmm...... you're right, Calzaghe has fought everyone, there is noone left......... :wink:
kevo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:30

Post by kevo »

Actually, I wouldn't be suprised if he ended up fighting Sakio Bika, the fella who's just had a TD with Beyer.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

Kevo wrote:Actually, I wouldn't be suprised if he ended up fighting Sakio Bika, the fella who's just had a TD with Beyer.
Yep, this is the final milestone, the missing bit to cement Calzaghe's legacy.
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Re: Joke Calzaghe! Seven Weeks Away and No Joe Foe!

Post by nickd »

Paul Powler wrote:7 weeks on Saturday and Joe Calzaghe will be fighting... errr... err.... beats me!!!! what the hell is the deal here??? Beyer... Joppy... Kessler... Mundine/Green winner... the Contender loser guy... Green, ... Miranda... Andrade... and now allegely Glen Johnson????? I've already got my tickets (fourth row! Hell yeah!) because of Skelton WilliamsII but this is embarrassing for Joe... didn't Warren ripp Hobson apart for not having a Ricky opponent nine weeks out? Didn'tWarren rip on Hobson for linking Hatton with all those names and not delivering them....in a DIRECT comparision with Hobson, Warren is already looking bad here... I mean, Joe is the udercard dude in his own backyard...
At least Hatton was being linked with decent names and they were trying to get him in with a good name. Who the hell has Calzaghe been linked with for this fight? Nobody decent, I've not seen him linked with Kessler. They have considered Joppy, Allan Green, Manfredo, Miranda, Andrade hardly a who's who of boxing is it?
jangeorg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 85
Joined: 09 Jun 2005, 03:04

Re: Joke Calzaghe! Seven Weeks Away and No Joe Foe!

Post by jangeorg »

nickd wrote:
Paul Powler wrote:7 weeks on Saturday and Joe Calzaghe will be fighting... errr... err.... beats me!!!! what the hell is the deal here??? Beyer... Joppy... Kessler... Mundine/Green winner... the Contender loser guy... Green, ... Miranda... Andrade... and now allegely Glen Johnson????? I've already got my tickets (fourth row! Hell yeah!) because of Skelton WilliamsII but this is embarrassing for Joe... didn't Warren ripp Hobson apart for not having a Ricky opponent nine weeks out? Didn'tWarren rip on Hobson for linking Hatton with all those names and not delivering them....in a DIRECT comparision with Hobson, Warren is already looking bad here... I mean, Joe is the udercard dude in his own backyard...
I've not seen him linked with Kessler. quote]





But if Kessler is not on the menu by 2007, Calzaghe should be ashamed of himself. Joe has spent years fighting handpicked foes and it appears that nothing has changed because I have never even heard him say the name Mikkel Kessler
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

Calzaghe clearly is near the tail end of his career and wants to fight someone with either a) a big reputation or b) a light heavyweight title or c) who will be a good money fight

my guess is he fights a fight like Miranda (tough fighter, but moving up) to pave the way for Beyer (3x champ who after Calzaghe is the longest reigning current s/m champ). then, i reckon he'll pursue Woods, who is bigger and more versatile than Kessler and has the IBF light heavy title

by then woods will have beaten johnson, and will have a solid international reputation. and tarver and hopkins will probably retire

how busy has kessler been, how many title defenses has he made? apart from mundine and siaca, who'd he beat of worth?

why shold he be ashamed with wins over Reid, Eubank, Starie, Woodhall, Mkrtchain, Brewer, Mitchell, Sheika and Lacy? work out the mathematics, that means he's faced a solid fighter or a world beater just about every other fight, really shameful

don't get me wrong, Kessler's going to be an outstanding champion, but let's see if Kessler is definitely something special. if he can beat Bute, Andrade, etc my hunch will be confirmed
lvlarc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1871
Joined: 16 Jan 2005, 02:24

Post by lvlarc »

Kevo wrote:Whoever could you have in ming Pundit? :wink:


I'd be interested to here what Boxingchat has to say on this subject.
Boxingchat had this to say on the matter.

No one wants to fight him at present. All pricing themselves out of it or saying they want no part of JC after the Lacy fight. . Should be an announcement by the end of the week or maybe the beginning of next.

Clinton Woods should have took the £400k he was offered
That was May 10th.


Talking about boxingchat, I've noticed Lirva has finally been banned, good stuff John :TU:
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

Didn't Kessler overprice himself?
mickeybeard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 488
Joined: 31 Jan 2004, 09:05

Post by mickeybeard »

According to Secondsout, who have no reasons to do a Warren fighter favours, he did.
Deram
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 168
Joined: 25 Sep 2005, 22:55

Post by Deram »

"Overpriced himself" ..

For how many hears haven't we heard that excuse.

Why is it that calzaghe has never given Kessler an offer when he has given many inferior fighters offers? Lately he even gave Beyer another offer.

I think the answer is pretty straightforward... Joe isn't too keen on fighting Kessler.
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

lvlarc_uk wrote:
Talking about boxingchat, I've noticed Lirva has finally been banned, good stuff John :TU:
About fuckin time. :TU:
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Post by TerribleTerry »

Deram wrote:
... Joe isn't too keen on fighting Kessler.
Deram,

fight negotaitions are never a straight forward situation - there is always accusation and counter accusation when talks break down/never commence.

Smoke and mirrors are the name of the game here, with both sides trying to discredit one another.

For all his failings in terms of getting career defining fights, I dont think Calzaghe himself would be at all fearful of facing ANY 12stoner; its all down to the money, timing and risk/reward ratios.

I am sure JC would box Kessler in June if the fight could be made but its managers, egos and vested interests that get in the way of sportsmen doing what they are paid to.
Coconut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 969
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 11:53

Post by Coconut »

More interested in Skelton - Williams and Lockett - Rhodes to be honest. Not expecting JC to be in with a killer.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Yeah kind of, except Kessler probably has the stones to get in the ring with Joe. I never saw any indication that Ottke wanted any part of a fight with Joe. I think he might have given Joe problems, depending on what kind of judge was appointed, but I always felt Joe would find a way to get to him and hammer him, and certainly wanted to see someone hammer the soporific one to the canvas.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Yeah kind of, except Kessler probably has the stones to get in the ring with Joe. I never saw any indication that Ottke wanted any part of a fight with Joe. I think he might have given Joe problems, depending on what kind of judge was appointed, but I always felt Joe would find a way to get to him and hammer him, and certainly wanted to see someone hammer the soporific one to the canvas.
It depends on WHEN they would have fought. People forget that Ottke and Calzaghe peaked at different times. Ottke peaked in 1999/2000 - this was the Ottke who toyed with Glen Johnson in the second half of their bout, who schooled Branco, and who made easy work of Brewer in their refight. In my book this was a pfp fighter, at least top 20 - almost perfect in what he was doing, and very hard to beat for any opponent. Calzaghe, in contrast, was still a bit edgy and one-dimensional - remember his struggles with Robin Reid.

But thereafter Ottke's legs slowed, making him much less effective; and Calzaghe became more complete and rounded. He's peaking NOW, six years after Ottke. Against Lacy he showed infighting skills that I had never seen from him before. From 2001/02 I'd pick Calzaghe over Ottke; and Calzaghe-Ottke in 2003 - which is when Calzaghe started calling Ottke out - would arguably have been a pretty one-sided affair.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Ottke was very effective at what he did, but at times it was bordering on simply running away around the ring, I watched his fight with Larssen, and Ottke spent large periods of the fight doing nothing but wheeling round the ring feinting with the jab. Hideous style to watch, and it's not like I hate fancy dans. I love watching technical boxing, but Ottke's style was the stuff of nightmares.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Ottke was very effective at what he did, but at times it was bordering on simply running away around the ring, I watched his fight with Larssen, and Ottke spent large periods of the fight doing nothing but wheeling round the ring feinting with the jab. Hideous style to watch, and it's not like I hate fancy dans. I love watching technical boxing, but Ottke's style was the stuff of nightmares.
Yeah, but Larsen was the way-past-his-prime Ottke. The prime Ottke could run AND conterpunch, in-out before the opponent realized what had happened. The past-prime Ottke could only run OR counterpunch, and he normally opted for running.
Coconut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 969
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 11:53

Post by Coconut »

Thing is, even after they'd been punched the opponents tended not to realise...
jangeorg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 85
Joined: 09 Jun 2005, 03:04

Re: Joke Calzaghe! Seven Weeks Away and No Joe Foe!

Post by jangeorg »

Paul Powler wrote:7 weeks on Saturday and Joe Calzaghe will be fighting... errr... err.... beats me!!!! what the hell is the deal here??? Beyer... Joppy... Kessler... Mundine/Green winner... the Contender loser guy... Green, ... Miranda... Andrade... and now allegely Glen Johnson????? I've already got my tickets (fourth row! Hell yeah!) because of Skelton WilliamsII but this is embarrassing for Joe... didn't Warren ripp Hobson apart for not having a Ricky opponent nine weeks out? Didn'tWarren rip on Hobson for linking Hatton with all those names and not delivering them....in a DIRECT comparision with Hobson, Warren is already looking bad here... I mean, Joe is the udercard dude in his own backyard...



Who Joe is fighting? , but he shouldn't worry - he can come out now. He has made sure that everyone else already has an opponent - so he can just pick some random guy. He made the Eubank-win last 8 years, so he will probably make the Lacy-win last another 3 or so years untill he retires... undefeated. hurrah.....
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

Well I hope Bubi's right that their trying to get Joe Beyer. :TU:

Kessler would rather fight guys who couldn't even beat Magee.
Coconut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 969
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 11:53

Post by Coconut »

A friend of mine who should know was 100% cetain yesterday that Lacy will be in the other corner in July.

US TV think it's still a winner.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

pundit wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Yeah kind of, except Kessler probably has the stones to get in the ring with Joe. I never saw any indication that Ottke wanted any part of a fight with Joe. I think he might have given Joe problems, depending on what kind of judge was appointed, but I always felt Joe would find a way to get to him and hammer him, and certainly wanted to see someone hammer the soporific one to the canvas.
It depends on WHEN they would have fought. People forget that Ottke and Calzaghe peaked at different times. Ottke peaked in 1999/2000 - this was the Ottke who toyed with Glen Johnson in the second half of their bout, who schooled Branco, and who made easy work of Brewer in their refight. In my book this was a pfp fighter, at least top 20 - almost perfect in what he was doing, and very hard to beat for any opponent. Calzaghe, in contrast, was still a bit edgy and one-dimensional - remember his struggles with Robin Reid.

But thereafter Ottke's legs slowed, making him much less effective; and Calzaghe became more complete and rounded. He's peaking NOW, six years after Ottke. Against Lacy he showed infighting skills that I had never seen from him before. From 2001/02 I'd pick Calzaghe over Ottke; and Calzaghe-Ottke in 2003 - which is when Calzaghe started calling Ottke out - would arguably have been a pretty one-sided affair.
they definitely peaked at different times. or, you could say, ottke got very old all of a sudden in 2003. i still don't think larsen beat him, which many ppl do.

ottke had nightmares with johnson, i had him barely scraping by but definitely winning
Post Reply