Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981
Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981
Cooney by wide decision. This was after Bugner came back and he was pretty bad in the 80's. He never had a big punch and he wasn't in great shape at this time either. Fighting a durable guy with little power and ambition would actually have been the perfect warm up for Holmes.
Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981
Agree with what the two guys say above.
This fight may well have helped Cooney against Holmes. I'm not saying he'd have won but I think 10 relatively easy rounds against the ever reluctant but durable Bugner would have been a help in him pacing himself for future engagements.
This fight may well have helped Cooney against Holmes. I'm not saying he'd have won but I think 10 relatively easy rounds against the ever reluctant but durable Bugner would have been a help in him pacing himself for future engagements.
Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981
Cooney had enough in the tank to last into round 13 against a prime and highly motivated Holmes, he would have no problems going 10 against a past it Bugner in survival mode. Bugner in the 80's had slowed down considerably and faded late in several of his distance fights.mercman wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 08:05 Which was I suppose the thinking behind fighting Bugner.
Cooney didn't have great gas though and would have only boxed two rounds over the previous year (Lyle and Norton).
I'm guessing Cooney would go in there firing on all cylinders but what would happen if he didn't get Bugner out of there early on? I mean, how many fights did Cooney win on points? Against skilled boxers, over 10 or 12 rounds?
Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981
While well past it, Bugner's size, length, durability and skill would've made this an interesting bout. He was only stopped 4 times in over 80 fights and by guys like Shavers and Bruno. (forgetting his first ever fight where he was ko'd by Paul Brown and Scott Welch which happened much later in his career).
I agree with the previous posters that it would've been a great warm up for Holmes. Figuring Bugner would have given Cooney a lot of really good rounds. It certainly wouldn't have been a blowout.
I agree with the previous posters that it would've been a great warm up for Holmes. Figuring Bugner would have given Cooney a lot of really good rounds. It certainly wouldn't have been a blowout.
Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981
True. But it's Bugner's mentality that's key. I can't imagine for a second that, given Cooney's reputation at the time, Bugner would have gone in there in anything other than survival mode.
Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981
I was a big fan of Cooney's at the time, but in retrospect he ducked a lot of fighters. Back injury for Bugner. I think a hand injury for Shavers. Gerry was supposed to fight Weaver at one point.
I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9468
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981
The Weaver fight was cancelled because #1 contender James Tillis filed a motion in court for his mandatory.Tony1244 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 12:15 I was a big fan of Cooney's at the time, but in retrospect he ducked a lot of fighters. Back injury for Bugner. I think a hand injury for Shavers. Gerry was supposed to fight Weaver at one point.
I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981
I remember something about that. I also remember Dennis Rappaport turning down the Cooney-Weaver fight because there was ore money in fighting Holmes.tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:13The Weaver fight was cancelled because #1 contender James Tillis filed a motion in court for his mandatory.Tony1244 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 12:15 I was a big fan of Cooney's at the time, but in retrospect he ducked a lot of fighters. Back injury for Bugner. I think a hand injury for Shavers. Gerry was supposed to fight Weaver at one point.
I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
As a fan, I wanted to see Cooney-Weaver. I thought that fight made more sense. Did Cooney's team make a mistake? We'll never know. If Cooney would have won his fight with Weaver, the added experience may have helped against Holmes. If Weaver would have beaten Cooney, Gerry's team made the right call.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9468
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981
I always wanted Cooney vs Weaver.Tony1244 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:23I remember something about that. I also remember Dennis Rappaport turning down the Cooney-Weaver fight because there was ore money in fighting Holmes.tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:13The Weaver fight was cancelled because #1 contender James Tillis filed a motion in court for his mandatory.Tony1244 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 12:15 I was a big fan of Cooney's at the time, but in retrospect he ducked a lot of fighters. Back injury for Bugner. I think a hand injury for Shavers. Gerry was supposed to fight Weaver at one point.
I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
As a fan, I wanted to see Cooney-Weaver. I thought that fight made more sense. Did Cooney's team make a mistake? We'll never know. If Cooney would have won his fight with Weaver, the added experience may have helped against Holmes. If Weaver would have beaten Cooney, Gerry's team made the right call.
I still think Cooney would of stopped him early. Weaver was such a slow starter
Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981
I agree. I'd favor, and did favor Cooney in that fight. I don't remember at this point the specifics of Tillis' demanding his shot against Weaver. I do remember Weaver won a very boring decision. As bad as the WBA is, you'd think they would have preferred Weaver-Cooney to Weaver-Tillis financially.tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:27I always wanted Cooney vs Weaver.Tony1244 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:23I remember something about that. I also remember Dennis Rappaport turning down the Cooney-Weaver fight because there was ore money in fighting Holmes.tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:13The Weaver fight was cancelled because #1 contender James Tillis filed a motion in court for his mandatory.Tony1244 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 12:15 I was a big fan of Cooney's at the time, but in retrospect he ducked a lot of fighters. Back injury for Bugner. I think a hand injury for Shavers. Gerry was supposed to fight Weaver at one point.
I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
As a fan, I wanted to see Cooney-Weaver. I thought that fight made more sense. Did Cooney's team make a mistake? We'll never know. If Cooney would have won his fight with Weaver, the added experience may have helped against Holmes. If Weaver would have beaten Cooney, Gerry's team made the right call.
I still think Cooney would of stopped him early. Weaver was such a slow starter
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9468
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981
It would of made way more money than any fight with Tillis.Tony1244 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:40I agree. I'd favor, and did favor Cooney in that fight. I don't remember at this point the specifics of Tillis' demanding his shot against Weaver. I do remember Weaver won a very boring decision. As bad as the WBA is, you'd think they would have preferred Weaver-Cooney to Weaver-Tillis financially.tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:27I always wanted Cooney vs Weaver.Tony1244 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:23I remember something about that. I also remember Dennis Rappaport turning down the Cooney-Weaver fight because there was ore money in fighting Holmes.tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:13The Weaver fight was cancelled because #1 contender James Tillis filed a motion in court for his mandatory.Tony1244 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 12:15 I was a big fan of Cooney's at the time, but in retrospect he ducked a lot of fighters. Back injury for Bugner. I think a hand injury for Shavers. Gerry was supposed to fight Weaver at one point.
I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
As a fan, I wanted to see Cooney-Weaver. I thought that fight made more sense. Did Cooney's team make a mistake? We'll never know. If Cooney would have won his fight with Weaver, the added experience may have helped against Holmes. If Weaver would have beaten Cooney, Gerry's team made the right call.
I still think Cooney would of stopped him early. Weaver was such a slow starter
And then a few defenses for Cooney before Holmes. Cooney and his team could of milked way more money out of his career
Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981
I don't think they wanted to take the gamble. You and I favored Cooney over Weaver. But Weaver had maybe a 30% chance of winning. Would you gamble on a 10 million dollar payday? What would Cooney have gotten against Weaver? 2-3 million?tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 15:05It would of made way more money than any fight with Tillis.Tony1244 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:40I agree. I'd favor, and did favor Cooney in that fight. I don't remember at this point the specifics of Tillis' demanding his shot against Weaver. I do remember Weaver won a very boring decision. As bad as the WBA is, you'd think they would have preferred Weaver-Cooney to Weaver-Tillis financially.tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:27I always wanted Cooney vs Weaver.Tony1244 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:23I remember something about that. I also remember Dennis Rappaport turning down the Cooney-Weaver fight because there was ore money in fighting Holmes.tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:13The Weaver fight was cancelled because #1 contender James Tillis filed a motion in court for his mandatory.Tony1244 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 12:15 I was a big fan of Cooney's at the time, but in retrospect he ducked a lot of fighters. Back injury for Bugner. I think a hand injury for Shavers. Gerry was supposed to fight Weaver at one point.
I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
As a fan, I wanted to see Cooney-Weaver. I thought that fight made more sense. Did Cooney's team make a mistake? We'll never know. If Cooney would have won his fight with Weaver, the added experience may have helped against Holmes. If Weaver would have beaten Cooney, Gerry's team made the right call.
I still think Cooney would of stopped him early. Weaver was such a slow starter
And then a few defenses for Cooney before Holmes. Cooney and his team could of milked way more money out of his career
From a business perspective I don't blame Cooney's team. From a fan's perspective, it sucked because we wanted to see Cooney-Weaver.
Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981
Don't know. Mike was quite powerful, and thinking about it, he would probably planned for the Cooney rush and sucker him into something Gerry wasn't ready for. A Cooney-Tillis fight for the vacant title would have been even better, for we truly could have found out some things before the inevitable.Tony1244 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:40I agree. I'd favor, and did favor Cooney in that fight. I don't remember at this point the specifics of Tillis' demanding his shot against Weaver. I do remember Weaver won a very boring decision. As bad as the WBA is, you'd think they would have preferred Weaver-Cooney to Weaver-Tillis financially.tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:27I always wanted Cooney vs Weaver.Tony1244 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:23I remember something about that. I also remember Dennis Rappaport turning down the Cooney-Weaver fight because there was ore money in fighting Holmes.tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 13:13The Weaver fight was cancelled because #1 contender James Tillis filed a motion in court for his mandatory.Tony1244 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2019, 12:15 I was a big fan of Cooney's at the time, but in retrospect he ducked a lot of fighters. Back injury for Bugner. I think a hand injury for Shavers. Gerry was supposed to fight Weaver at one point.
I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
As a fan, I wanted to see Cooney-Weaver. I thought that fight made more sense. Did Cooney's team make a mistake? We'll never know. If Cooney would have won his fight with Weaver, the added experience may have helped against Holmes. If Weaver would have beaten Cooney, Gerry's team made the right call.
I still think Cooney would of stopped him early. Weaver was such a slow starter
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981
I think Mike would have stopped cooney.
Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981
That fight would have been the betting man's dream.