Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post Reply
hhaehre
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6427
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 07:26

Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post by hhaehre »

Cooney by wide decision. This was after Bugner came back and he was pretty bad in the 80's. He never had a big punch and he wasn't in great shape at this time either. Fighting a durable guy with little power and ambition would actually have been the perfect warm up for Holmes.
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2702
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post by Flump »

Agree with what the two guys say above.

This fight may well have helped Cooney against Holmes. I'm not saying he'd have won but I think 10 relatively easy rounds against the ever reluctant but durable Bugner would have been a help in him pacing himself for future engagements.
hhaehre
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6427
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 07:26

Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post by hhaehre »

mercman wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 08:05 Which was I suppose the thinking behind fighting Bugner.

Cooney didn't have great gas though and would have only boxed two rounds over the previous year (Lyle and Norton).

I'm guessing Cooney would go in there firing on all cylinders but what would happen if he didn't get Bugner out of there early on? I mean, how many fights did Cooney win on points? Against skilled boxers, over 10 or 12 rounds?
Cooney had enough in the tank to last into round 13 against a prime and highly motivated Holmes, he would have no problems going 10 against a past it Bugner in survival mode. Bugner in the 80's had slowed down considerably and faded late in several of his distance fights.
oogiebe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post by oogiebe »

While well past it, Bugner's size, length, durability and skill would've made this an interesting bout. He was only stopped 4 times in over 80 fights and by guys like Shavers and Bruno. (forgetting his first ever fight where he was ko'd by Paul Brown and Scott Welch which happened much later in his career).

I agree with the previous posters that it would've been a great warm up for Holmes. Figuring Bugner would have given Cooney a lot of really good rounds. It certainly wouldn't have been a blowout.
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2702
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post by Flump »

mercman wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 10:52 Past his best, yes. But Bugner would only have been 31 at the time so he wasn't that over the hill.
True. But it's Bugner's mentality that's key. I can't imagine for a second that, given Cooney's reputation at the time, Bugner would have gone in there in anything other than survival mode.
oogiebe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post by oogiebe »

mercman wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 10:52 Past his best, yes. But Bugner would only have been 31 at the time so he wasn't that over the hill.
True but also 14 years in the pro ring.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24715
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post by Tony1244 »

I was a big fan of Cooney's at the time, but in retrospect he ducked a lot of fighters. Back injury for Bugner. I think a hand injury for Shavers. Gerry was supposed to fight Weaver at one point.

I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9468
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post by tiny_acres »

Tony1244 wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 12:15 I was a big fan of Cooney's at the time, but in retrospect he ducked a lot of fighters. Back injury for Bugner. I think a hand injury for Shavers. Gerry was supposed to fight Weaver at one point.

I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
The Weaver fight was cancelled because #1 contender James Tillis filed a motion in court for his mandatory.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24715
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post by Tony1244 »

tiny_acres wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:13
Tony1244 wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 12:15 I was a big fan of Cooney's at the time, but in retrospect he ducked a lot of fighters. Back injury for Bugner. I think a hand injury for Shavers. Gerry was supposed to fight Weaver at one point.

I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
The Weaver fight was cancelled because #1 contender James Tillis filed a motion in court for his mandatory.
I remember something about that. I also remember Dennis Rappaport turning down the Cooney-Weaver fight because there was ore money in fighting Holmes.

As a fan, I wanted to see Cooney-Weaver. I thought that fight made more sense. Did Cooney's team make a mistake? We'll never know. If Cooney would have won his fight with Weaver, the added experience may have helped against Holmes. If Weaver would have beaten Cooney, Gerry's team made the right call.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9468
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post by tiny_acres »

Tony1244 wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:23
tiny_acres wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:13
Tony1244 wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 12:15 I was a big fan of Cooney's at the time, but in retrospect he ducked a lot of fighters. Back injury for Bugner. I think a hand injury for Shavers. Gerry was supposed to fight Weaver at one point.

I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
The Weaver fight was cancelled because #1 contender James Tillis filed a motion in court for his mandatory.
I remember something about that. I also remember Dennis Rappaport turning down the Cooney-Weaver fight because there was ore money in fighting Holmes.

As a fan, I wanted to see Cooney-Weaver. I thought that fight made more sense. Did Cooney's team make a mistake? We'll never know. If Cooney would have won his fight with Weaver, the added experience may have helped against Holmes. If Weaver would have beaten Cooney, Gerry's team made the right call.
I always wanted Cooney vs Weaver.
I still think Cooney would of stopped him early. Weaver was such a slow starter
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24715
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post by Tony1244 »

tiny_acres wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:27
Tony1244 wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:23
tiny_acres wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:13
Tony1244 wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 12:15 I was a big fan of Cooney's at the time, but in retrospect he ducked a lot of fighters. Back injury for Bugner. I think a hand injury for Shavers. Gerry was supposed to fight Weaver at one point.

I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
The Weaver fight was cancelled because #1 contender James Tillis filed a motion in court for his mandatory.
I remember something about that. I also remember Dennis Rappaport turning down the Cooney-Weaver fight because there was ore money in fighting Holmes.

As a fan, I wanted to see Cooney-Weaver. I thought that fight made more sense. Did Cooney's team make a mistake? We'll never know. If Cooney would have won his fight with Weaver, the added experience may have helped against Holmes. If Weaver would have beaten Cooney, Gerry's team made the right call.
I always wanted Cooney vs Weaver.
I still think Cooney would of stopped him early. Weaver was such a slow starter
I agree. I'd favor, and did favor Cooney in that fight. I don't remember at this point the specifics of Tillis' demanding his shot against Weaver. I do remember Weaver won a very boring decision. As bad as the WBA is, you'd think they would have preferred Weaver-Cooney to Weaver-Tillis financially.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9468
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post by tiny_acres »

Tony1244 wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:40
tiny_acres wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:27
Tony1244 wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:23
tiny_acres wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:13
Tony1244 wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 12:15 I was a big fan of Cooney's at the time, but in retrospect he ducked a lot of fighters. Back injury for Bugner. I think a hand injury for Shavers. Gerry was supposed to fight Weaver at one point.

I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
The Weaver fight was cancelled because #1 contender James Tillis filed a motion in court for his mandatory.
I remember something about that. I also remember Dennis Rappaport turning down the Cooney-Weaver fight because there was ore money in fighting Holmes.

As a fan, I wanted to see Cooney-Weaver. I thought that fight made more sense. Did Cooney's team make a mistake? We'll never know. If Cooney would have won his fight with Weaver, the added experience may have helped against Holmes. If Weaver would have beaten Cooney, Gerry's team made the right call.
I always wanted Cooney vs Weaver.
I still think Cooney would of stopped him early. Weaver was such a slow starter
I agree. I'd favor, and did favor Cooney in that fight. I don't remember at this point the specifics of Tillis' demanding his shot against Weaver. I do remember Weaver won a very boring decision. As bad as the WBA is, you'd think they would have preferred Weaver-Cooney to Weaver-Tillis financially.
It would of made way more money than any fight with Tillis.
And then a few defenses for Cooney before Holmes. Cooney and his team could of milked way more money out of his career
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24715
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post by Tony1244 »

tiny_acres wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 15:05
Tony1244 wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:40
tiny_acres wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:27
Tony1244 wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:23
tiny_acres wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:13
Tony1244 wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 12:15 I was a big fan of Cooney's at the time, but in retrospect he ducked a lot of fighters. Back injury for Bugner. I think a hand injury for Shavers. Gerry was supposed to fight Weaver at one point.

I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
The Weaver fight was cancelled because #1 contender James Tillis filed a motion in court for his mandatory.
I remember something about that. I also remember Dennis Rappaport turning down the Cooney-Weaver fight because there was ore money in fighting Holmes.

As a fan, I wanted to see Cooney-Weaver. I thought that fight made more sense. Did Cooney's team make a mistake? We'll never know. If Cooney would have won his fight with Weaver, the added experience may have helped against Holmes. If Weaver would have beaten Cooney, Gerry's team made the right call.
I always wanted Cooney vs Weaver.
I still think Cooney would of stopped him early. Weaver was such a slow starter
I agree. I'd favor, and did favor Cooney in that fight. I don't remember at this point the specifics of Tillis' demanding his shot against Weaver. I do remember Weaver won a very boring decision. As bad as the WBA is, you'd think they would have preferred Weaver-Cooney to Weaver-Tillis financially.
It would of made way more money than any fight with Tillis.
And then a few defenses for Cooney before Holmes. Cooney and his team could of milked way more money out of his career
I don't think they wanted to take the gamble. You and I favored Cooney over Weaver. But Weaver had maybe a 30% chance of winning. Would you gamble on a 10 million dollar payday? What would Cooney have gotten against Weaver? 2-3 million?

From a business perspective I don't blame Cooney's team. From a fan's perspective, it sucked because we wanted to see Cooney-Weaver.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7191
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post by Nile4000 »

Tony1244 wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:40
tiny_acres wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:27
Tony1244 wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:23
tiny_acres wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 13:13
Tony1244 wrote: 28 Mar 2019, 12:15 I was a big fan of Cooney's at the time, but in retrospect he ducked a lot of fighters. Back injury for Bugner. I think a hand injury for Shavers. Gerry was supposed to fight Weaver at one point.

I think Joe would have given Gerry some trouble and they figured that out, which is likely why the fight never happened.
The Weaver fight was cancelled because #1 contender James Tillis filed a motion in court for his mandatory.
I remember something about that. I also remember Dennis Rappaport turning down the Cooney-Weaver fight because there was ore money in fighting Holmes.

As a fan, I wanted to see Cooney-Weaver. I thought that fight made more sense. Did Cooney's team make a mistake? We'll never know. If Cooney would have won his fight with Weaver, the added experience may have helped against Holmes. If Weaver would have beaten Cooney, Gerry's team made the right call.
I always wanted Cooney vs Weaver.
I still think Cooney would of stopped him early. Weaver was such a slow starter
I agree. I'd favor, and did favor Cooney in that fight. I don't remember at this point the specifics of Tillis' demanding his shot against Weaver. I do remember Weaver won a very boring decision. As bad as the WBA is, you'd think they would have preferred Weaver-Cooney to Weaver-Tillis financially.
Don't know. Mike was quite powerful, and thinking about it, he would probably planned for the Cooney rush and sucker him into something Gerry wasn't ready for. A Cooney-Tillis fight for the vacant title would have been even better, for we truly could have found out some things before the inevitable.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post by Onetimeonly »

I think Mike would have stopped cooney.
hhaehre
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6427
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 07:26

Re: Gerry Cooney v Joe Bugner 1981

Post by hhaehre »

Onetimeonly wrote: 31 Mar 2019, 02:58 I think Mike would have stopped cooney.
That fight would have been the betting man's dream.
Post Reply