Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

For RBR threads only

Last hour predictions?

Poll ended at 21 Apr 2019, 18:50

Crawford - Decision
0
No votes
Crawford - T/KO
16
80%
DRAW
1
5%
Khan - T/KO
1
5%
Khan - Decision
2
10%
 
Total votes: 20

TheBeast
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5244
Joined: 23 Jul 2009, 02:06

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by TheBeast »

Image


Saturday 20, April 2019
Madison Square Garden, New York, New York, USA
promoter Top Rank - Bob Arum
matchmaker Brad Goodman
inspector Matthew Delaglio


welterweight
Terence Crawford 34 0 0
vs
Amir Khan 33 4 0
World Boxing Organisation World Welterweight Title

Khan RTD
Khan down in round 1





FULL CARD HIGHLIGHTS HERE:
https://www.the13thround.com/phpBB2/vie ... &start=100


ENJOY!! :TU:
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by Best Coast »

ironbeard wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 23:38 He quit. Get over it. And no, you do not know that. First of all, Crawford would not have quit. He would have taken the time to recover and proceeded to KTFO Khan.

Khan did NOT take the time to recover because he was done. He saw the exit sign and took it. PERIOD.
Thanks for making sense!! :TU:
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by Ilya Muromets »

Silly posters reinforce each others self esteem by telling ech other how much sense they make and how smart they are.

But whaddya expect, Illya? U r not on a website devoted to nuclear phsics or paleontology or classical literature or something. It's a boxing forum fer Pete's sake! So stop acting so superior (even tho u r!)
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by Best Coast »

Ilya Muromets wrote: 22 Apr 2019, 02:36 Silly posters reinforce each others self esteem by telling ech other how much sense they make and how smart they are.

But whaddya expect, Illya? U r not on a website devoted to nuclear phsics or paleontology or classical literature or something. It's a boxing forum fer Pete's sake! So stop acting so superior (even tho u r!)
Maybe you should spend more of your precious time at your beloved nuclear physics/paleontology websites so you dont have to deal with ordinary "peasants" like us boxing fans!! I have a hunch the pompous elitists you would encounter at classical literature websites would be more to your liking. :wave:
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by Ilya Muromets »

Best Coast wrote: 22 Apr 2019, 03:04 Maybe you should spend more of your precious time at your beloved nuclear physics/paleontology websites so you dont have to deal with ordinary "peasants" like us boxing fans!! I have a hunch the pompous elitists you would encounter at classical literature websites would be more to your liking. :wave:

But you'd be distraught and mournful if i left, and i would feel badly too thinking that the peasents here would no longer have a wise and noble role model and mentor like me to look up to and strive one day to emulate, Thus i am torn and cannot decide. Can i be so bold as to inquire what a - no offense! - simple primitive near-bestial barely-sentient sub human peasant such as yourself opines?
Thomastearns
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2401
Joined: 26 Feb 2017, 11:11

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by Thomastearns »

Ilya Muromets wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 20:25 IMHO Crawford should have been disqualified and Khan declared the winner OR the fight declared a NC. Also the clown dressed up in the referee suit should get in the long line of refs and boxing judges to be investigated - and drug tested too -but that line already stretches out on to the street and around the block! Put those shill announcers on the line too.
Twenty five years ago this may have been a possibility. Instead now we are in an age where we can't seem to find a single politician with any integrity left, hardly a single whistleblowing journalist left, and meek announcers / presenters.

All of them seem terrified of losing the gig. Puppets riding the gravy train. Sure there's still a few willing to speak up such as Montero, Malignaggi and Atlas - but they're voices are currently being pushed out further and further to the periphery.

Even here in the UK there's very little outcry over the ending of the fight. The focus switched almost immediately to the question of Khan quitting instead of the ridiculous low blow which Crawford initially denied happening! As for a full five minutes recovery - when has that ever happened?

It didn't change the result but there was still a fight on. Where's the criticism/ punishment of landing a punch that far below the belt? Nothing borderline about it.

Come back Howard, come back Harry.
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by Ilya Muromets »

Thomastearns wrote: 22 Apr 2019, 03:57

Twenty five years ago this may have been a possibility. Instead now we are in an age where we can't seem to find a single politician with any integrity left, hardly a single whistleblowing journalist left, and meek announcers / presenters.

All of them seem terrified of losing the gig. Puppets riding the gravy train. Sure there's still a few willing to speak up such as Montero, Malignaggi and Atlas - but they're voices are currently being pushed out further and further to the periphery.

Even here in the UK there's very little outcry over the ending of the fight. The focus switched almost immediately to the question of Khan quitting instead of the ridiculous low blow which Crawford initially denied happening! As for a full five minutes recovery - when has that ever happened?

It didn't change the result but there was still a fight on. Where's the criticism/ punishment of landing a punch that far below the belt? Nothing borderline about it.

Come back Howard, come back Harry.


Good post! At least one whistleblowing journalist. They've got him locked up in your country, the former Great Britain. More often they find them fosterized. Telling the truth in boxing is not usually - usually - that dangerous, but a boxing announcer, or newscaster. slips up and tells the truth, he'll be out of work so fast his head will spin! It happened to George Foreman . Yes, there are still a few with loose tongues that are grandfathered in, but they are phasing them out, and all that will be left are the house shills, Max Kellerman and the like. More and more women boxing interviewers too I see. They don't know anything about boxing but they give them a script. Even forget about telling the truth, I miss the announcers who would just broadcast the action - "it's a left and a right" - and skip the endless babbling. Come back, Les!
Last edited by Ilya Muromets on 22 Apr 2019, 11:18, edited 1 time in total.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by oogiebe »

RKY wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 22:51 No he's a "weight bully".... going around bullying heavier men with his lesser weight. :lol:
LOL! :lol:
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by jamamb »

the one at 15 seconds doesnt look low to me. id have to see another angle to be sure

the one at 40 is low though not right on the crotch/balls
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by ewenhay »

I see some haven't taken Crawford beating Khan very well then.

The ref was useless though, should have called the 5 minutes straight away and shut up for the duration.
greg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5303
Joined: 23 Mar 2007, 07:44

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by greg »

...a couple of things I learned watching this fight:

1. Khan had no chance of winning as largely expected
2. Crawford is a dirty fighter
3. Referee was not qualified to deal with low blows
4. Khan used the situation to bail out
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24626
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by Tony1244 »

greg wrote: 22 Apr 2019, 13:20 ...a couple of things I learned watching this fight:

1. Khan had no chance of winning as largely expected
2. Crawford is a dirty fighter
3. Referee was not qualified to deal with low blows
4. Khan used the situation to bail out
I agree w/ #1 and #4, not 2 and 3.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by jamamb »

crawford is a mean fighter, i dont think he goes out there looking to foul though
greg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5303
Joined: 23 Mar 2007, 07:44

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by greg »

..Crawford seems to be a cool, level-headed boxer able to dominate and control the fight with his jab. It's not like he is in the habit of throwing haymakers or punches like windmills ...those low blows looked out of place and if the referee doesn't respond to fouling, why not just keep doing it. Crawford is smart enough to be aware of that...
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by ewenhay »

Anyone thinking Crawford resorted to intentional low blows in order to get Khan out of there is clutching at straws
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by oogiebe »

ewenhay wrote: 22 Apr 2019, 19:31 Anyone thinking Crawford resorted to intentional low blows in order to get Khan out of there is clutching at straws
Clutching at something! Certainly not reality. :OhYes:
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by oogiebe »

Amir Khan losing more of my respect:

“The fight was 100 percent turning,” Khan said. “I could see (Crawford) slowing down; that fifth round was one of his worst. It’s a strategy; how can you hit somehow that low? He knows. He’s a professional fighter."

LMFAO!
APerno
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1653
Joined: 20 Jul 2016, 03:38

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by APerno »

Best Coast wrote: 22 Apr 2019, 03:04 Maybe you should spend more of your precious time at your beloved nuclear physics/paleontology websites so you dont have to deal with ordinary "peasants" like us boxing fans!! I have a hunch the pompous elitists you would encounter at classical literature websites would be more to your liking. :wave:
I don't think you should assume classical literature sites are full of pompous elitists just because this guy talks to himself.
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by Ilya Muromets »

APerno wrote: 22 Apr 2019, 19:52 I don't think you should assume classical literature sites are full of pompous elitists just because this guy talks to himself.


It's OK to talk to yourself. It's when you answer back that it gets strange. What do you mean? Quiet please I'm talking.
Last edited by Ilya Muromets on 22 Apr 2019, 21:52, edited 1 time in total.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by oogiebe »

Ilya Muromets wrote: 22 Apr 2019, 21:46 It's OK to talk to yourself. It's when you answer back that it gets strange. What do you mean? Quiet please I'm talking.
LOL! You really are funny sometimes! Not sure other folks get you! :lol:
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by Ilya Muromets »

The referee's behavior alone should have made that fight a NC. When you get hit low you get 5 minutes in which to recover. You don't get a referee yelling in your face, "Do you want to continue!?" Whose side was Khan's corner on anyway? Obviously the guy was in a lot of pain. He just got slugged in the balls. They should have told him to take the time to recover.
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by Ilya Muromets »

oogiebe wrote: 22 Apr 2019, 21:53 LOL! You really are funny sometimes! Not sure other folks get you! :lol:
That's OK, Oogy Boogy. I think I'm funny, right? No. Shut up.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by oogiebe »

Ilya Muromets wrote: 22 Apr 2019, 21:57 That's OK, Oogy Boogy. I think I'm funny, right? No. Shut up.
And you're insane! :KO:
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - April 20, 2019

Post by Ilya Muromets »

oogiebe wrote: 22 Apr 2019, 22:04 And you're insane! :KO:



:OhYes:
Post Reply