Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑17 May 2019, 10:51
He rates above Bowe, but not far above Bowe. He simply was on top for a longer period of time and so deserves to be higher. But it's closer than you think.
You should not just just say a win over a guy in the top 10 are all the same. They aren't. Bowe's wins over Holyfield vastly superior to anything Lewis ever did.
Akinwande was not any good. Bowe had wins not mentioned that are superior to that.
Tucker was past his best as well.
Beating Klitschko is not a big deal He never beat anyone very good.
Even beating McCall wasn't anything special. Nobody thought much of him until he beat Lewis. His next biggest wins is scratching out a close decision over an ancient Larry Holmes, and a tough fight with Bruce Seldon. (whom Bowe blew out in one round)
The wins over Holyfield and Tyson don't mean a lot. They were both way past it when Lewis beat them. The rematch "win" over Holyfield was not impressive and was a questionable decision.
The Mercer decision was iffy. He should not have got more than a draw in that fight.
You also have to look at the losses. Bowe's only loss was to a prime Evander Holyfield. He fought a very good fight and lost a close decision; probably could have got a draw. That should not be held against him.
Lewis lost to two weaker fighters. -Rahman and McCall (albiet it controversially.)
In summary, you have to look at the fights much more closely than you do. You have to take into consideration the stages of fighter's career as well as the stages of opponent's in their career .
You have to look at the losses- How close were they, who were they to? A close loss to a great fighter is not something you should hold against someone. A one-sided loss and/or a loss to an inferior fighter counts heavily against you.
Ultimately you should weight the importance of all the wins against all the losses draws, bad performances.