Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
Other than Naz with his nuclear power and a couple of fighters with excitingly vulnerable chins are there (m)any other examples of Wincobank boxers that weren't boring to watch? Ryan Rhodes to some extent but who else?
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
I don't know if that is fair, they are defensively minded, but maybe Nelson, Witter and Galahad have given them a bad name. They have also been in plenty of good fights too but when up against it they are safety first.
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
Kell Brook in his prime was a good watch.
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
Btw, I am not slagging the style in terms of its effectiveness. Hatton avoided Witter for a reason, for example.
-
Bazooka el cholo
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 37
- Joined: 16 Jun 2019, 01:41
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
Early on good domestic and area level fighters that came from there were quite conventional..I.e. mick mills,Pete bennet, Walter Clayton, Brian Anderson, chris Walker to name but a few. Since then and after bomber, predominantly, looking from the outside they are more box/punchers erring on the side of caution. John Keaton tbf had some real humdingers and will tell you himself he was no defensive master. Jon thaxton also came for a go most times. If the right kid with the right attributes take to this style of boxing and coaching it is devastatingly effective
-
Fray Bentos
- Lightweight
- Posts: 16813
- Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
I loved watching Herol Graham - his dismantling of Mark Kaylor was very entertaining. Granted, there are only a few boxers with the natural ability to pull it off.
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
I don't know if it's the style, or just against certain opponents. But when they stink a place out, they REALLY do it.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13418
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
I was going to write part way through the fight that I think it’s a style that requires big power to be able to make the step to genuine World title winning level.
Witter had big power in the lead up to an during his World title run. Naz we know about and Bomber nearly got there.
Witter had big power in the lead up to an during his World title run. Naz we know about and Bomber nearly got there.
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
Fidel Castro Smith was good. I think the Wincobank style is
more awkward than boring.
more awkward than boring.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
Agreed,that style with the ko punch was ok,although to be fair Bomber Graham nearly always went for the stoppage/ko and paid the price,Witter against Harris was good,against Bradley was terrible.jameswilson wrote: ↑16 Jun 2019, 09:31 I was going to write part way through the fight that I think it’s a style that requires big power to be able to make the step to genuine World title winning level.
Witter had big power in the lead up to an during his World title run. Naz we know about and Bomber nearly got there.
-
Nondescript
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 3489
- Joined: 07 Sep 2018, 07:50
-
Pugilist-specialist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1632
- Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
I've got bored of watching Liam Williams banging everyone out since he moved to Wincobank.
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
i wouldnt say its boring, i think alot of it stems from Johnny Nelson's fight with de leon, but that was more to do with Nelsons nerves and confidence then the style its self.
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
He doesn't have what most people would fairly describe as the Wincobank style, does he.Pugilist-specialist wrote: ↑16 Jun 2019, 11:08 I've got bored of watching Liam Williams banging everyone out since he moved to Wincobank.
I'm talking about those built there from being kids.
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
British level tho innit. See how he goes for a world title.Pugilist-specialist wrote: ↑16 Jun 2019, 11:08 I've got bored of watching Liam Williams banging everyone out since he moved to Wincobank.
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
I loved Herol Graham, and it would be harsh to call Naz boring......
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
I agree with this on the whole, when they can’t hurt their opponent it can lead to very messy, scrappy fights., Even Naz was really boring when he couldn’t hurt someone - Soto, McCullough, Calvo.
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
Is it a 'Wincobank Style' or did Herol move it there from Nottingham?
-
smiling assassin
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3224
- Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
No I definitely wouldn't call it boring. It can be used both well for attack and defence. Ultimately it's down to the fighter how he goes about using it. Rhodes used the style very effectively and was in some great fights to watch
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13418
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
I find the fighters now days who are trained under Dominick switch far less than the Brendan trained fighters.
Naz, Witter and Eesham Pickering we’re switching 4 or 5 times a round usually.
Naz, Witter and Eesham Pickering we’re switching 4 or 5 times a round usually.
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
Not sure if it has changed since Brendan's days, but that no head shot sparring is/was the issue. So defensively minded and just looking to avoid at all costs taking a head shot.
They've certainly had fighters who've not fitted the mould...... Kell Brook certainly never fought like a traditional Ingle fighter - don't think he was elusive enough and had a fantastic jab..... and yes those with KO power are usually exciting - but were known to have dull ones - Naz and Ryan Rhodes spring to mind.
Very effective, but also very frustrating - Gallahad looked frightened of taking any shots at the weekend.
They've certainly had fighters who've not fitted the mould...... Kell Brook certainly never fought like a traditional Ingle fighter - don't think he was elusive enough and had a fantastic jab..... and yes those with KO power are usually exciting - but were known to have dull ones - Naz and Ryan Rhodes spring to mind.
Very effective, but also very frustrating - Gallahad looked frightened of taking any shots at the weekend.
Re: Is the Wincobank style inherently boring?
good callPugilist-specialist wrote: ↑16 Jun 2019, 11:08 I've got bored of watching Liam Williams banging everyone out since he moved to Wincobank.