With Tennis and Athletics you can be a flop one week and a hero the next, alot of companies will pay high sponsership hoping that these guys will fulfill their potential.Loftgroov wrote:The point is though nobody ever seems to bring our lot to task over their performances. If …sorry…. when Henman loses you have people like Sue Barker on TV saying how well he did, or how unlucky he was, or how it wasn’t his day today. It never bloody is!
We’ve debated this before with regard to athletics, and people like Mark-Lewis Francis who has achieved about as much in athletics as Stephen Hawking, yet is draped in bling and admired by (most of) the public at large.
Any form of sponsorship for these people should be rescinded until they win something of note. If I hear the word “hero” in association with Tim Henman ever again I may very well proceed to the BBC offices and demand an explanation.
Nelson was a hero, Colonel H. Jones was a hero….. Tim Henman is not a “hero”. If I had my way, “Henman Hill” would be noted for being a crucifixion site for it’s namesake, as opposed to a viewing platform for strawberry-munching, champagne coifing tools.
Its different with boxing, one bad defeat and your a flop, look at Audley Harrison for that, who'd sponser him now?