Don't think they would want to losing that sort of money for long if true .
Maybe put subscription up to fill the void , I remember when sky in the UK was free in the early days , look at the price of it now .
Don't think they would want to losing that sort of money for long if true .
I don't think sub prices are their issue. I think they are over rating boxing's popularity. They will need to expand to cover other sports and package their offering to a wider audience. Else, it'll be game over within a year I suspect.
Ok ,I wish sky would go the other way and give boxing its own dedicated channel , probably not sustainable in today's entertainment market but I will never pay a sub to prop up sports I can't stand .
Boxing is way more popular in the UK then in the US by a long shot. If a boxing only channel can't work there than it'll never happen here. I think DAZN does UFC aside from boxing. (I always mix up MMA with UFC, but it's one of them.)
They have bellator. UFC is on ESPN, theyre using it as a lead in for some boxing.
He loves boxing, that was his first plan ages ago. The boxing would be under the zuffa banner. Boxers are pampered and overpaid these days. I doubt he'll find it to his liking but if the rumors of them buying the pbc pan out it would be interesting.HomicideHenry wrote: ↑09 Jun 2019, 17:43 Just a reminder, too.... White is still planning on promoting boxing himself.... As much revenue, etc as the UFC has generated for the man I find it interesting that he's adamant of pursuing boxing.
I wouldn't trust those figures as far as I could throw them. It was seemingly free to air live in Nigeria via Twese Sports (as per their facebook). To watch it live with that many pirates doesn't make sense.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 13:04 The fight set an online piracy viewership record, with live illegal streams watched by more than 13 million viewers worldwide, surpassing Deontay Wilder vs. Tyson Fury.
93% of the illegal online viewership came from unauthorised streams that appeared on YouTube.
The countries with the highest online piracy viewership were Nigeria with 2.35 million viewers, followed by Kenya and the United Kingdom with nearly 1 million viewers each
Im not sure where that was lifted , but literally made up stats there.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 13:04 The fight set an online piracy viewership record, with live illegal streams watched by more than 13 million viewers worldwide, surpassing Deontay Wilder vs. Tyson Fury.
93% of the illegal online viewership came from unauthorized streams that appeared on YouTube.
The countries with the highest online piracy viewership were Nigeria with 2.35 million viewers, followed by Kenya and the United Kingdom with nearly 1 million viewers each
X2Onetimeonly wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 08:09 Yeah, if they can accurately track it they could shut it down. Probably leaked by hearn to tackle the fact that fight didn't draw many subscriptions.
These figure are from other countries NOT USA.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 08:09 Yeah, if they can accurately track it they could shut it down. Probably leaked by hearn to tackle the fact that fight didn't draw many subscriptions.
I don't believe them from any country.
Neither do I tbh
Pretty sure Sky do know all that, but they’re just making hay whilst the sun shines. As long as there’s people willing to pay them crazy subscription fees - and then PPV on top! - then they’d be foolish as a business not to exploit it. But they’re definitely moving into the online streaming side of things; NOW tv seems to get promoted way more than regular Sky these days. They know it’s just a matter of time until the old business model is dead.G0mez wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 07:15 Im not sure where that was lifted , but literally made up stats there.
There is zero way of knowing the viewership and percentage of people using X or Y platform to do so.
Furthermore, there is no data to say that these people would have paid money to have watched it officially, should their stream be unavailable to them.
At the end of the day, if a product is easily accessible and reasonably priced in the first place, then streaming would not be the animal that its become.
To expect people to pay out for a box, annual subscription and all the other bells and whistles - to enable themselves to watch the event in crisp HD in the year 2019 is completely missing the point.
Sky's business decision makers only has themselves to blame here. The event should be available to non-customers whom dont want to support 250 channels of rubbish they wont watch, just in order to buy a fight.
If they're accurate they don't have a problem.
We have to wait until the whole story unfolds but In light of the Whyte-Rivas aftermath so far, I'll be interested to see what Bunce has to say about boxing cheating PPV customers by selling shows knowing that one of the main event boxers had failed a drug test.
First time I’ve ever seen this. Sums him up. Absolute dog. Was well known in boxing circles in the 90s and naughties for his greed and free-loading. Now whining over illegal streams you seriously couldn’t make it up.
If in doubt, assume Bunce is a total moron.Exoddus wrote: ↑27 Jul 2019, 03:34 I'm not sure if Bunce is just a total moron and the words he spoke about Jade Goody were just confused and just came out totally wrong.
I'm not defending Jade Goody on celebrity big brother. Her program she made while she was dying was one of the most important programs ever on TV. It opened the eyes of a younger generation to the horrible disease of cancer. It stopped cancer being considered an old persons disease.
Young girls going for smear tests rose and continues to rise dramatically in the UK after Jade Goodies death. It certainly made a whole new generation aware.
I do think that's what that idiot Bunce meant.