Sounds right. LOL on the 'descriptor.'Onetimeonly wrote: ↑23 Jul 2019, 22:06Tunney was 3-1-1 against green if I recall correctly. One being a derided decision for gene. As much as a cock as klompton is, he knows that inside out. If you see the "officious little prick" about, ask him. Bonus points for knowing the literary reference in quotations.oogiebe wrote: ↑23 Jul 2019, 20:37
I never thought of Tunney as top 5 or even 10. Maybe not even top 20 P4P. He didn't do anything remarkably. He did a lot of things really well. A terrific boxer/puncher who caught Dempsey at the right time. Had he fought a few more title defenses after the rematch his stock may have gone up. Beating Greb 4(?) times certainly helps him, but Harry was a smaller fighter who had beaten Tunney once.
Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
You know the book? Hint, worst movie adaption from a book ever.oogiebe wrote: ↑23 Jul 2019, 22:10Sounds right. LOL on the 'descriptor.'Onetimeonly wrote: ↑23 Jul 2019, 22:06
Tunney was 3-1-1 against green if I recall correctly. One being a derided decision for gene. As much as a cock as klompton is, he knows that inside out. If you see the "officious little prick" about, ask him. Bonus points for knowing the literary reference in quotations.
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
The Shining.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑23 Jul 2019, 23:16You know the book? Hint, worst movie adaption from a book ever.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
oogiebe wrote: ↑24 Jul 2019, 09:07The Shining.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑23 Jul 2019, 23:16
You know the book? Hint, worst movie adaption from a book ever.
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
BTW, while movie's are rarely as good or better than the book, I like this one.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
LOL! I didn't say it followed the book's characters so much. I had the same feelings about The Godfather. If you had read that before seeing the movie, you might have been scratching you head at the casting as well. Books can always delve deeper into characters, as you know.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑24 Jul 2019, 10:02The worst. Terrible casting, Wendy is actually supposed to be a sympathetic character. Nothing good to say about that one. Jack was awful.
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
I scratch my head when I see Dempsey on so many P4P lists, while Tunney is nowhere to be found. I rate Tunney as a top 10 HW of all time, if era and size are taken into account.oogiebe wrote: ↑23 Jul 2019, 20:37I never thought of Tunney as top 5 or even 10. Maybe not even top 20 P4P. He didn't do anything remarkably. He did a lot of things really well. A terrific boxer/puncher who caught Dempsey at the right time. Had he fought a few more title defenses after the rematch his stock may have gone up. Beating Greb 4(?) times certainly helps him, but Harry was a smaller fighter who had beaten Tunney once.
My lists, like most people's lists on sports or music fluctuate, but Tunney being #10 or #20 P4P is reasonable. Agreed, top 5 is a bit high.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
Yeah, but that's a great movie too. This one is trash.oogiebe wrote: ↑24 Jul 2019, 10:05LOL! I didn't say it followed the book's characters so much. I had the same feelings about The Godfather. If you had read that before seeing the movie, you might have been scratching you head at the casting as well. Books can always delve deeper into characters, as you know.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑24 Jul 2019, 10:02
The worst. Terrible casting, Wendy is actually supposed to be a sympathetic character. Nothing good to say about that one. Jack was awful.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
I don't have Dempsey top 10 at heavy so Tunney isn't close for me. Jack could sneak into a top 100 all-time but I doubt it.Tony1244 wrote: ↑24 Jul 2019, 10:53I scratch my head when I see Dempsey on so many P4P lists, while Tunney is nowhere to be found. I rate Tunney as a top 10 HW of all time, if era and size are taken into account.oogiebe wrote: ↑23 Jul 2019, 20:37
I never thought of Tunney as top 5 or even 10. Maybe not even top 20 P4P. He didn't do anything remarkably. He did a lot of things really well. A terrific boxer/puncher who caught Dempsey at the right time. Had he fought a few more title defenses after the rematch his stock may have gone up. Beating Greb 4(?) times certainly helps him, but Harry was a smaller fighter who had beaten Tunney once.
My lists, like most people's lists on sports or music fluctuate, but Tunney being #10 or #20 P4P is reasonable. Agreed, top 5 is a bit high.
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
Sounds like you really love the novel, regardless of the movie.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑24 Jul 2019, 11:56Yeah, but that's a great movie too. This one is trash.oogiebe wrote: ↑24 Jul 2019, 10:05
LOL! I didn't say it followed the book's characters so much. I had the same feelings about The Godfather. If you had read that before seeing the movie, you might have been scratching you head at the casting as well. Books can always delve deeper into characters, as you know.
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
I'm amazed by how many "experts" have had Dempsey top 10 even P4P. It's like saying Jackie Robinson is a top 10 BB player of all time. They are both significant characters in American history, but neither are top 10 material.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑24 Jul 2019, 11:58I don't have Dempsey top 10 at heavy so Tunney isn't close for me. Jack could sneak into a top 100 all-time but I doubt it.Tony1244 wrote: ↑24 Jul 2019, 10:53
I scratch my head when I see Dempsey on so many P4P lists, while Tunney is nowhere to be found. I rate Tunney as a top 10 HW of all time, if era and size are taken into account.
My lists, like most people's lists on sports or music fluctuate, but Tunney being #10 or #20 P4P is reasonable. Agreed, top 5 is a bit high.
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
He was certainly one of Boxing's biggest superstars. A lot of the time that stands out more in people's minds than talent. Especially to casual fans. The real true Pound for Pound geniuses of the sport often go unappreciated by the common folk, who just like brutality, and knockouts.
It's actually quite amazing how lucrative of a career Mayweather was able to have in the last few decades. Goes to show that the idea of P4P #1 has been driven into the psyche of Boxing fans hard, because without that I'm sure his fights wouldn't have been anywhere near the draw they were.
Leonard would be Top 15 if I hadn't already answered that earlier in the thread for the record.
It's actually quite amazing how lucrative of a career Mayweather was able to have in the last few decades. Goes to show that the idea of P4P #1 has been driven into the psyche of Boxing fans hard, because without that I'm sure his fights wouldn't have been anywhere near the draw they were.
Leonard would be Top 15 if I hadn't already answered that earlier in the thread for the record.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
Indeed, he may be the most popular and influential fighter ever but his resume isn't close.Tony1244 wrote: ↑24 Jul 2019, 12:10I'm amazed by how many "experts" have had Dempsey top 10 even P4P. It's like saying Jackie Robinson is a top 10 BB player of all time. They are both significant characters in American history, but neither are top 10 material.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑24 Jul 2019, 11:58
I don't have Dempsey top 10 at heavy so Tunney isn't close for me. Jack could sneak into a top 100 all-time but I doubt it.
-
ClivePatrickLyons
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
Top 10 and going of your list elmersalsa about 7 id put The Greatest Fighter i seen in the last 40 year's.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15668
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
Say hey, Sugar Ray! Happy Birthday! He is 69 years old today. Keep it going, champ!
One of the best I have ever seen.
One of the best I have ever seen.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15128
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
Look at you, pretending that you like Leonard so it seems fair that you rank him so low. At least be honest that you don't like him. You once said that he wasn't a real fighter.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15668
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
I love Sugar Ray Leonard before you ever liked him. What you're talking about?Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑18 May 2025, 16:09 Look at you, pretending that you like Leonard so it seems fair that you rank him so low. At least be honest that you don't like him. You once said that he wasn't a real fighter.
To rank him at top ten it would be a blasphemy. Not fair . Why? Because there are much more deserving boxers that deserve to be ahead of him.
At #18, I think that is a fair ranking.
-
Caractacus
- Middleweight
- Posts: 18514
- Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15128
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
You love him before I ever like him? We are about the same age you know. I saw him in the Olympics too.elmersalsa wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 06:58I love Sugar Ray Leonard before you ever liked him. What you're talking about?Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑18 May 2025, 16:09 Look at you, pretending that you like Leonard so it seems fair that you rank him so low. At least be honest that you don't like him. You once said that he wasn't a real fighter.
To rank him at top ten it would be a blasphemy. Not fair . Why? Because there are much more deserving boxers that deserve to be ahead of him.
At #18, I think that is a fair ranking.
You said he was not a "real fighter". Obviously, you would not have said that if you liked him.
-
Jeff_lacy_ko
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 5711
- Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
Leonard was the best fighter out of his era, and it was a hell of an era in those weight classes
I wouldnt confidently pick any fighter in history to beat him. Not that he was unbeatable, but i wouldn't confidently pick someone to beat him
I wouldnt confidently pick any fighter in history to beat him. Not that he was unbeatable, but i wouldn't confidently pick someone to beat him
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
I still don't think I've seen a boxer who looks as good on film as Leonard. Maybe Lomachenko.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16814
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
The wins over Benitez, Duran, Hearns and Hagler put him in my top ten.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15128
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Where Do You Rank Sugar Ray Leonard in the Pound per Pound All Time List?
You hit the nail on the head. How many fighters have a better "victim's list is as good or better than that? There are less than 10. Robinson, Greb, Armstrong, Charles, Langford, and Ali. Thats it.
The main arguments against him usually are: His career was too short -To which I respond with, so what. He beat 4 great fighters in a relatively short time. Doesn't matter if another guy fought way longer if he didn't beat as good of competition.
The other one is that he didn't have enough fights. Again, so what? In boxing, you can always find an automatic win. Leonard could have padded his win total with wins over tomato cans that he could not possibly have lost to.
Sure, we could say that so and so won 70 or 80 fights. That would not make them better than Leonard if they didn't beat better fighters. Carnera won 89 fights and Ali won 56. Nobody thinks Carnera was better or even remotely close.
Robinson, Greb, Armstrong, Charles, Langford, Ali and Leonard are rock solid Top 10. There should be no debate about this. Which means that there are three other guys who could comprise the Top 10. Guys like Monzon, Moore, Louis, Duran, Pep, etc. Debating between those guys is much more interesting.
The main arguments against him usually are: His career was too short -To which I respond with, so what. He beat 4 great fighters in a relatively short time. Doesn't matter if another guy fought way longer if he didn't beat as good of competition.
The other one is that he didn't have enough fights. Again, so what? In boxing, you can always find an automatic win. Leonard could have padded his win total with wins over tomato cans that he could not possibly have lost to.
Sure, we could say that so and so won 70 or 80 fights. That would not make them better than Leonard if they didn't beat better fighters. Carnera won 89 fights and Ali won 56. Nobody thinks Carnera was better or even remotely close.
Robinson, Greb, Armstrong, Charles, Langford, Ali and Leonard are rock solid Top 10. There should be no debate about this. Which means that there are three other guys who could comprise the Top 10. Guys like Monzon, Moore, Louis, Duran, Pep, etc. Debating between those guys is much more interesting.