Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
Sources around are suggesting Fury's next opponent is going to be Charles Martin.
Good opponent?
Good opponent?
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13417
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
Just to see mickey1975 justify it after laying into AJ for fighting him.
Yes it is,
Yes it is,
Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
Sure beats tom Schwarz. had wilder fought him some posters would be calling him "AJ Leftovers." LOL!
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39344
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39344
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
-
gregregegg
- Lightweight
- Posts: 9191
- Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08
Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
This is poor. Considering fury is probably the number 1 heavyweight right now vsing someone who's Career best performance was a close loss to kownaki is disappointing.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16905
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
If Top Rank are paying Fury 10m+ for this fair play to Fury - another cherry picked walkover without much risk.gregregegg wrote: ↑29 Jul 2019, 18:58 This is poor. Considering fury is probably the number 1 heavyweight right now vsing someone who's Career best performance was a close loss to kownaki is disappointing.
-
gregregegg
- Lightweight
- Posts: 9191
- Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08
Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
Oh I mean it's not great for the fans. But as a boxer it's hard to say know you 8 figure walkovers.3132DW wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 10:57If Top Rank are paying Fury 10m+ for this fair play to Fury - another cherry picked walkover without much risk.gregregegg wrote: ↑29 Jul 2019, 18:58 This is poor. Considering fury is probably the number 1 heavyweight right now vsing someone who's Career best performance was a close loss to kownaki is disappointing.
-
Twinkle Toes
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3342
- Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38
Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
Rubbish.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23096
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
I think it’s terrible, but the same people slating it thought AJ was a world champion for beating him.jameswilson wrote: ↑29 Jul 2019, 18:17 Just to see mickey1975 justify it after laying into AJ for fighting him.
Yes it is,
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39344
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
Ive long maintained that Chuck is nowehere near as bad as his reputation would have (he was pretty much same level as kownacki in there fight), but a guy at Furys level should do better, especially after his last opponent was bums ahoy
Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
Could one issue be that Matchroom have that many of the HW on their books now they are struggling for viable opponents ?margaret thatcher wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 14:40 Ive long maintained that Chuck is nowehere near as bad as his reputation would have (he was pretty much same level as kownacki in there fight), but a guy at Furys level should do better, especially after his last opponent was bums ahoy
-
lillywhite14
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
Bonus of not holding a belt I guess.
Can keep facing shite and getting away with it, well, sort of ( not seen one person here call it a good match up, at best you get ‘well, Martin isn’t as bad as Schwarz!’
)
Can keep facing shite and getting away with it, well, sort of ( not seen one person here call it a good match up, at best you get ‘well, Martin isn’t as bad as Schwarz!’
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39344
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
Ya, all that talk like lineal is what matters, but having a fantasy title also means you have no obligations to fight anyone and can just keep doing craplillywhite14 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 15:37 Bonus of not holding a belt I guess.
Can keep facing shite and getting away with it, well, sort of ( not seen one person here call it a good match up, at best you get ‘well, Martin isn’t as bad as Schwarz!’)
-
lillywhite14
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
It seems he’s not cut out for long term champion status unfortunately
Slightly different topic, but I attended one of his ‘evening with Tyson Fury’ events recently.
It was awful
Got to say, he doesn’t seem particularly genuine at all and the ‘problems’ he had, could well have been massively overstated. One big money grab set up.
Worked though to be fair!
Slightly different topic, but I attended one of his ‘evening with Tyson Fury’ events recently.
It was awful
Worked though to be fair!
Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
Its not an amazing fight & personally I'd rather see him vs. a more dangerous opponent , but its another great payday for Tyson & why take any real risk & potentially lose out on the huge money from the Wilder rematch?
Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
An American opponent is wanted but who is there? Wilder, Ruiz and Miller are unavailable.
So we have Martin or so one like Molina, Washington, Breazdale, Arreola, Jennings?
So we have Martin or so one like Molina, Washington, Breazdale, Arreola, Jennings?
Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin
lillywhite14 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 15:53 It seems he’s not cut out for long term champion status unfortunately
Slightly different topic, but I attended one of his ‘evening with Tyson Fury’ events recently.
It was awfulGot to say, he doesn’t seem particularly genuine at all and the ‘problems’ he had, could well have been massively overstated. One big money grab set up.
Worked though to be fair!![]()