Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post Reply
MasterG
Lightweight
Posts: 7633
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 16:45

Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by MasterG »

Sources around are suggesting Fury's next opponent is going to be Charles Martin.

Good opponent?
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13417
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by jameswilson »

Just to see mickey1975 justify it after laying into AJ for fighting him.

Yes it is,
oogiebe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by oogiebe »

Sure beats tom Schwarz. had wilder fought him some posters would be calling him "AJ Leftovers." LOL!
MasterG
Lightweight
Posts: 7633
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 16:45

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by MasterG »

oogiebe wrote: 29 Jul 2019, 18:42 Sure beats tom Schwarz. had wilder fought him some posters would be calling him "AJ Leftovers." LOL!
Talksport are calling it 'Scraping the Barrel'
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39344
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by margaret thatcher »

poor
oogiebe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by oogiebe »

MasterG wrote: 29 Jul 2019, 18:43
oogiebe wrote: 29 Jul 2019, 18:42 Sure beats tom Schwarz. had wilder fought him some posters would be calling him "AJ Leftovers." LOL!
Talksport are calling it 'Scraping the Barrel'
I wouldn't say that he's scraping the barrel. He's a fringe contender at best.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39344
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by margaret thatcher »

oogiebe wrote: 29 Jul 2019, 18:42 Sure beats tom Schwarz. had wilder fought him some posters would be calling him "AJ Leftovers." LOL!
It'll be called poor no matter if its Fury or Wilder
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9191
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by gregregegg »

This is poor. Considering fury is probably the number 1 heavyweight right now vsing someone who's Career best performance was a close loss to kownaki is disappointing.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16905
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by Nightmare Roy »

MasterG wrote: 29 Jul 2019, 18:43
oogiebe wrote: 29 Jul 2019, 18:42 Sure beats tom Schwarz. had wilder fought him some posters would be calling him "AJ Leftovers." LOL!
Talksport are calling it 'Scraping the Barrel'
They are being nice
3132DW
Middleweight
Posts: 1435
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 03:27

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by 3132DW »

gregregegg wrote: 29 Jul 2019, 18:58 This is poor. Considering fury is probably the number 1 heavyweight right now vsing someone who's Career best performance was a close loss to kownaki is disappointing.
If Top Rank are paying Fury 10m+ for this fair play to Fury - another cherry picked walkover without much risk.
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9191
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by gregregegg »

3132DW wrote: 30 Jul 2019, 10:57
gregregegg wrote: 29 Jul 2019, 18:58 This is poor. Considering fury is probably the number 1 heavyweight right now vsing someone who's Career best performance was a close loss to kownaki is disappointing.
If Top Rank are paying Fury 10m+ for this fair play to Fury - another cherry picked walkover without much risk.
Oh I mean it's not great for the fans. But as a boxer it's hard to say know you 8 figure walkovers.
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3342
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by Twinkle Toes »

Rubbish.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23096
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by mickey1975 »

jameswilson wrote: 29 Jul 2019, 18:17 Just to see mickey1975 justify it after laying into AJ for fighting him.

Yes it is,
I think it’s terrible, but the same people slating it thought AJ was a world champion for beating him.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39344
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by margaret thatcher »

Ive long maintained that Chuck is nowehere near as bad as his reputation would have (he was pretty much same level as kownacki in there fight), but a guy at Furys level should do better, especially after his last opponent was bums ahoy
3132DW
Middleweight
Posts: 1435
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 03:27

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by 3132DW »

margaret thatcher wrote: 30 Jul 2019, 14:40 Ive long maintained that Chuck is nowehere near as bad as his reputation would have (he was pretty much same level as kownacki in there fight), but a guy at Furys level should do better, especially after his last opponent was bums ahoy
Could one issue be that Matchroom have that many of the HW on their books now they are struggling for viable opponents ?
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by lillywhite14 »

Bonus of not holding a belt I guess.

Can keep facing shite and getting away with it, well, sort of ( not seen one person here call it a good match up, at best you get ‘well, Martin isn’t as bad as Schwarz!’ :lol: )
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39344
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by margaret thatcher »

lillywhite14 wrote: 30 Jul 2019, 15:37 Bonus of not holding a belt I guess.

Can keep facing shite and getting away with it, well, sort of ( not seen one person here call it a good match up, at best you get ‘well, Martin isn’t as bad as Schwarz!’ :lol: )
Ya, all that talk like lineal is what matters, but having a fantasy title also means you have no obligations to fight anyone and can just keep doing crap
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by lillywhite14 »

It seems he’s not cut out for long term champion status unfortunately

Slightly different topic, but I attended one of his ‘evening with Tyson Fury’ events recently.
It was awful :lol: Got to say, he doesn’t seem particularly genuine at all and the ‘problems’ he had, could well have been massively overstated. One big money grab set up.
Worked though to be fair! :TU:
moogie101
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 406
Joined: 15 Nov 2008, 14:11

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by moogie101 »

Its not an amazing fight & personally I'd rather see him vs. a more dangerous opponent , but its another great payday for Tyson & why take any real risk & potentially lose out on the huge money from the Wilder rematch?
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28510
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by Coco »

An American opponent is wanted but who is there? Wilder, Ruiz and Miller are unavailable.
So we have Martin or so one like Molina, Washington, Breazdale, Arreola, Jennings?
fanman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 619
Joined: 05 Jun 2013, 19:56

Re: Tyson Fury v Charles Martin

Post by fanman »

lillywhite14 wrote: 30 Jul 2019, 15:53 It seems he’s not cut out for long term champion status unfortunately

Slightly different topic, but I attended one of his ‘evening with Tyson Fury’ events recently.
It was awful :lol: Got to say, he doesn’t seem particularly genuine at all and the ‘problems’ he had, could well have been massively overstated. One big money grab set up.
Worked though to be fair! :TU:
Post Reply