How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
..who beat Mike Tyson
Discuss
Discuss
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
He would've barely been Top 10 in the world at that time. Every other active Heavyweight who was somebody at that time would've likely beaten him. He was briefly ranked off beating shot Mike though, but that was a very brief run.
Brewster, Byrd, Ruiz, The Klitschko's (Vitali did beat him), Sam Peter, Toney....I don't really see Danny beating any of those guys.
Brewster, Byrd, Ruiz, The Klitschko's (Vitali did beat him), Sam Peter, Toney....I don't really see Danny beating any of those guys.
-
chrisjs1985
- Lightweight
- Posts: 783
- Joined: 11 Jan 2018, 12:45
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Crap, in a word.
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
He was great. Not really a world class guy though, as pointed out already. Had some top domestic scraps.
-
Controversial
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9186
- Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
He had decent ability but seemed to lack confidence in himself, an underachiever. I stood next to him once and I was surprised just how big he was, he’s a massive lump.
-
writehooks
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 181
- Joined: 17 Mar 2011, 13:12
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
I'm not sure he was ever even good enough to beat the Danny Williams on the original Hawaii Five-0.
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Gotta agree with this.gilgamesh wrote: ↑06 Sep 2019, 12:08 He would've barely been Top 10 in the world at that time. Every other active Heavyweight who was somebody at that time would've likely beaten him. He was briefly ranked off beating shot Mike though, but that was a very brief run.
Brewster, Byrd, Ruiz, The Klitschko's (Vitali did beat him), Sam Peter, Toney....I don't really see Danny beating any of those guys.
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Only just about top 10 at his best.., but still my AT favourite boxer. 
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Danny Williams was ranked in the Top 10 - by both the WBC and WBA - in 2003
Well known he only got the Tyson fight - at short notice - because Kevin McBride's management were asking for too much money....
Well known he only got the Tyson fight - at short notice - because Kevin McBride's management were asking for too much money....
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15182
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
It's almost as if the WBC and the WBA put Williams in the Top 10 so that his fight with Tyson would seem like a bigger deal than it was. .....Wait, there is no way that those two respected organizations would do something like that.
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑09 Sep 2019, 14:16 It's almost as if the WBC and the WBA put Williams in the Top 10 so that his fight with Tyson would seem like a bigger deal than it was. .....Wait, there is no way that those two respected organizations would do something like that.
Danny was outside the Top 10, until he signed with Don King - then, hey presto - he was ranked in the top 10 by both WBC & WBA - just pure co-incidence of course
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
I bet 4 people $20 even up after the first Rd. Thanks Danny!
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
shite would cover it i think
-
funso banjo baby
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4417
- Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
I tend to disagree a bit.
Danny was certainly a bit short of the top level but he was a ferocious puncher in his day.
I'd have given him a fair chance against someone like Brewster.
The weird thing was Danny's strange wobbly legs syndrome. If he'd had a granite chin he'd have been a def contender at his peak...whenever that was.
anyway, he was a warrior and I wont have a bad word said about him

Danny was certainly a bit short of the top level but he was a ferocious puncher in his day.
I'd have given him a fair chance against someone like Brewster.
The weird thing was Danny's strange wobbly legs syndrome. If he'd had a granite chin he'd have been a def contender at his peak...whenever that was.
anyway, he was a warrior and I wont have a bad word said about him
-
polecateddy
- Heavyweight

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
British and Commonwealth level, but a level below European level as evidenced by his results.
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
That's about spot on PCBritish and Commonwealth level, but a level below European level as evidenced by his results.
Although Danny was very decent at that Brit-Commonwealth level and certainly one or two lesser Brit champs than him managed to win the blue Euro belt in the past.
The arrival of the seriously big, quite well-schooled and very hungry Eastern European heavies shook-up the European scene in terms of quality, physical ability and ambition big time.
It was no longer a title the Brits, Italians and Germans and the odd Scandinavian shared out between themselves.