Top ten heavyweights of all time...

oogiebe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Top ten heavyweights of all time...

Post by oogiebe »

Onetimeonly wrote: 13 Oct 2019, 19:22
oogiebe wrote: 13 Oct 2019, 19:11

No doubt, but the type of style that Tyson had was a young man's style. He was far past it at 33 (for him). Holy was the better fighter with better accomplishments, but a 22 year old Tyson would have been a handful for a even prime Holy.
That's just speculation. With what happened in reality there is no reasoning to rank Mike ahead of him.
I don't. Said that two posts ago. Just making a point that prime Tyson vs Prime Holy would've been a better fight than the first actual one.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Top ten heavyweights of all time...

Post by Onetimeonly »

oogiebe wrote: 13 Oct 2019, 19:23
Onetimeonly wrote: 13 Oct 2019, 19:22
That's just speculation. With what happened in reality there is no reasoning to rank Mike ahead of him.
I don't. Said that two posts ago. Just making a point that prime Tyson vs Prime Holy would've been a better fight than the first actual one.
I agree it would have been better, still one-sided with the same result.
oogiebe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Top ten heavyweights of all time...

Post by oogiebe »

Onetimeonly wrote: 13 Oct 2019, 19:26
oogiebe wrote: 13 Oct 2019, 19:23
I don't. Said that two posts ago. Just making a point that prime Tyson vs Prime Holy would've been a better fight than the first actual one.
I agree it would have been better, still one-sided with the same result.
Is holy your fav?
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Top ten heavyweights of all time...

Post by Onetimeonly »

oogiebe wrote: 13 Oct 2019, 19:31
Onetimeonly wrote: 13 Oct 2019, 19:26

I agree it would have been better, still one-sided with the same result.
Is holy your fav?
Hearns, favorite heavy. Whom I like or hate doesn't sway my rankings. He's just more accomplished. Clear as day.
oogiebe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Top ten heavyweights of all time...

Post by oogiebe »

Onetimeonly wrote: 13 Oct 2019, 20:27
oogiebe wrote: 13 Oct 2019, 19:31
Is holy your fav?
Hearns, favorite heavy. Whom I like or hate doesn't sway my rankings. He's just more accomplished. Clear as day.
I wasn't insinuating. But now that you mention it... :lol: We all know that Tommy is your fav of all time and that is a great choice.
Jacopodb
Super Featherweight
Posts: 460
Joined: 17 Aug 2018, 12:17

Re: Top ten heavyweights of all time...

Post by Jacopodb »

Onetimeonly wrote: 08 Oct 2019, 17:44
Jacopodb wrote: 08 Oct 2019, 17:32

For some reason I was considering Sugar Ray Robinson as a welterweight, and Griffith as a middleweight, when it's quite the opposite.

Sorry, nevertheless I agree on Sugar Ray being arguably the best ever at middleweight.
:TU: don't agree on Robinson but it's certainly reasonable. Srr was definitely at his best at welter, you had that right.
He was rather thin, altho he had quite a long reach, I believe, but his "low-hands" guard had him exposed to harder middleweight shots: he lost to great middleweights, then took his time to adapt to their style, and came back victorious. Hagler and Monzon would have been a threat to him.

Griffith was also more comfortable as a welterweight, but his strong complexion, and safer style, made him a terrific middleweight: he was in perfect shape against Tiger and Benvenuti, and lost to younger all-timers late in his career. :TU:
Post Reply