I don't. Said that two posts ago. Just making a point that prime Tyson vs Prime Holy would've been a better fight than the first actual one.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑13 Oct 2019, 19:22That's just speculation. With what happened in reality there is no reasoning to rank Mike ahead of him.
Top ten heavyweights of all time...
Re: Top ten heavyweights of all time...
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Top ten heavyweights of all time...
I agree it would have been better, still one-sided with the same result.oogiebe wrote: ↑13 Oct 2019, 19:23I don't. Said that two posts ago. Just making a point that prime Tyson vs Prime Holy would've been a better fight than the first actual one.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑13 Oct 2019, 19:22
That's just speculation. With what happened in reality there is no reasoning to rank Mike ahead of him.
Re: Top ten heavyweights of all time...
Is holy your fav?Onetimeonly wrote: ↑13 Oct 2019, 19:26I agree it would have been better, still one-sided with the same result.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Top ten heavyweights of all time...
Hearns, favorite heavy. Whom I like or hate doesn't sway my rankings. He's just more accomplished. Clear as day.oogiebe wrote: ↑13 Oct 2019, 19:31Is holy your fav?Onetimeonly wrote: ↑13 Oct 2019, 19:26
I agree it would have been better, still one-sided with the same result.
Re: Top ten heavyweights of all time...
I wasn't insinuating. But now that you mention it...Onetimeonly wrote: ↑13 Oct 2019, 20:27Hearns, favorite heavy. Whom I like or hate doesn't sway my rankings. He's just more accomplished. Clear as day.
Re: Top ten heavyweights of all time...
He was rather thin, altho he had quite a long reach, I believe, but his "low-hands" guard had him exposed to harder middleweight shots: he lost to great middleweights, then took his time to adapt to their style, and came back victorious. Hagler and Monzon would have been a threat to him.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑08 Oct 2019, 17:44don't agree on Robinson but it's certainly reasonable. Srr was definitely at his best at welter, you had that right.
Griffith was also more comfortable as a welterweight, but his strong complexion, and safer style, made him a terrific middleweight: he was in perfect shape against Tiger and Benvenuti, and lost to younger all-timers late in his career.