Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
Where would you rate him in the British heavyweight division? Number 2 behind Lennox?
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
Yeah he’s still behind Lennox for me, if he beats aj( which I think he will) and then has several defences against the likes of Whyte , usyk, Ruiz.dubious/Joyce winner etc will he over take Lennox ?
-
tigermoth87
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1795
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
Behind Lennox for now.
If he beats AJ and say Usyk,, then he'll start to give Lennox some competition. I dunno how many more fights Fury is gonna have, but I hope he doesn't waste them on soft defences.
AJ, Usuk and Whyte would be a nice next 3 fights. Hrgovic would be a decent scalp too, if Hrgovic is still undefeated by then.
If he beats AJ and say Usyk,, then he'll start to give Lennox some competition. I dunno how many more fights Fury is gonna have, but I hope he doesn't waste them on soft defences.
AJ, Usuk and Whyte would be a nice next 3 fights. Hrgovic would be a decent scalp too, if Hrgovic is still undefeated by then.
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
Behind Lennox for me as well. I would take Lewis to beat Fury any day.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32850
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
Miles behind Lewis, but certainly has a strong argument for no. 2.
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
If he beats AJ convincingly, then he's #1.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32850
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
No. Lennox’s overall quality of opposition was far better. Obviously not Fury’s fault that the division is so much weaker now, but even with those wins I don’t think his resume would be close to Lewis.
-
craig_minter
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 72
- Joined: 13 Dec 2012, 18:30
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
Far behind Lennox, still believe AJ is the current number one... I mean he does hold the majority of the belts and faced tougher opposition than Tyson in general.
Winner of AJ vs Fury has the potential to be number one in history.
Winner of AJ vs Fury has the potential to be number one in history.
-
Lenny Cravats
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 8023
- Joined: 23 Feb 2013, 10:43
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
Behind Lennox.
36 year old Holyfield beats everyone on Fury's sheet.
36 year old Holyfield beats everyone on Fury's sheet.
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
I'm a fan of both, but it's difficult for Fury to prove himself in this era, one where Ortiz is still a top 10 fighter at 53 
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
I think fury sees the game for what it is. He’ll have a soft, money grabbing defence then cash out vs AJ. I don’t think he’s too fussed about legacy or being an ATG. And I don’t blame him tbh, I would imagine his old man will have instilled in him a ‘get in, get the money and run’ attitude from a young age (being an ex fighter himself)
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
Number 2.
He'd have to beat AJ, Whyte and Usyk to be #1 for me.
He'd have to beat AJ, Whyte and Usyk to be #1 for me.
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
1. Lennox Lewis.
2. Tyson Fury.
And The Gypsy King will become #1 once.
2. Tyson Fury.
And The Gypsy King will become #1 once.
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
A strong argument bud? Who the hell else are you having in this argument?Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑23 Feb 2020, 06:20 Miles behind Lewis, but certainly has a strong argument for no. 2.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32850
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
tobyh5 wrote: ↑23 Feb 2020, 08:04A strong argument bud? Who the hell else are you having in this argument?Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑23 Feb 2020, 06:20 Miles behind Lewis, but certainly has a strong argument for no. 2.

More seriously, I would personally have Fury at number 2 but wouldn’t particularly argue if someone had Joshua above him. Just hope they actually fight and we can settle it once and for all.
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
Behind Lewis. There's not enough viable opposition out there at the moment to allow Fury to overtake Lennox...
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
hahaha I forgot Big Aud! Brillaint. And what a picture!Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑23 Feb 2020, 08:10
More seriously, I would personally have Fury at number 2 but wouldn’t particularly argue if someone had Joshua above him. Just hope they actually fight and we can settle it once and for all.
YES HE CAN!
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
I assume we’re talking heavyweights here, in that case second behind Lennox.
However, reading how bad you all think Wilder is and how he can’t box and only has his big punch, maybe we shouldn’t get too excited! Beating Tom Schwartz and Otto Wallin isn’t going to get you ATG status...
I do rate Fury but I’m not hailing him as the messiah until he has a few more decent names on his record.
However, reading how bad you all think Wilder is and how he can’t box and only has his big punch, maybe we shouldn’t get too excited! Beating Tom Schwartz and Otto Wallin isn’t going to get you ATG status...
I do rate Fury but I’m not hailing him as the messiah until he has a few more decent names on his record.
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
Even Wilder's biggest detractors on here didn't predict the absolute humiliating beat-down that Fury dished out. Jeff Lacy got off lightly in comparison to that.milpool wrote: ↑23 Feb 2020, 09:26 I assume we’re talking heavyweights here, in that case second behind Lennox.
However, reading how bad you all think Wilder is and how he can’t box and only has his big punch, maybe we shouldn’t get too excited! Beating Tom Schwartz and Otto Wallin isn’t going to get you ATG status...
I do rate Fury but I’m not hailing him as the messiah until he has a few more decent names on his record.
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
Still second to Lewis and probably always will be.
No shame in that though.
Having said that, winning a world title away from home twice is an impressive feat. Hats off to him. Hope he stays healthy and happy and is fulfilled by this win this time.
No shame in that though.
Having said that, winning a world title away from home twice is an impressive feat. Hats off to him. Hope he stays healthy and happy and is fulfilled by this win this time.
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
Nothing has changed he's been #2 since he beat Wlad, who will always be the best name on his resume.
The division is absolutely dire now, so I don't think Fury will ever be able to catch Lewis...he'd need about 20 title defenses and at least a couple other fighters to achieve something before he gets them. Fury is good enough to be in the conversation, but he'll never be able to prove it given the peers he's got available.
The division is absolutely dire now, so I don't think Fury will ever be able to catch Lewis...he'd need about 20 title defenses and at least a couple other fighters to achieve something before he gets them. Fury is good enough to be in the conversation, but he'll never be able to prove it given the peers he's got available.
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
For now? That win was soooo good but he’s a country mile off Lennox, who beat Bruno, Tyson, Holyfield, Rahman, Tua, Vitali, Grant, Morrison, Briggs, Mercer, Botha, Golata, Tucker. Fury’s miles off that resumetigermoth87 wrote: ↑23 Feb 2020, 05:59 Behind Lennox for now.
If he beats AJ and say Usyk,, then he'll start to give Lennox some competition. I dunno how many more fights Fury is gonna have, but I hope he doesn't waste them on soft defences.
AJ, Usuk and Whyte would be a nice next 3 fights. Hrgovic would be a decent scalp too, if Hrgovic is still undefeated by then.
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
Lewis is number one by a country mile,Fury is number 2 followed closely by AJ,AJ has the better resume at the minute but Fury has two of the best heavyweights of the last 17 years on his record other than them there isnt anyone else tbh. Fury beats AJ imo by same way he beat wilder.
Re: Where would you rank Tyson Fury in British history?
I'd say, with Wilder's scalp Fury's resume became better for sure. And Fury is closer to Lewis than on a mile. I agree about the other points though.thechump wrote: ↑23 Feb 2020, 13:55 Lewis is number one by a country mile,Fury is number 2 followed closely by AJ,AJ has the better resume at the minute but Fury has two of the best heavyweights of the last 17 years on his record other than them there isnt anyone else tbh. Fury beats AJ imo by same way he beat wilder.