Worst Boxing Tipster Of All Time
-
garethdooley
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5
- Joined: 19 Jun 2006, 08:21
derek bilton
i am a professional gambler and i have logged onto this website for a while now for an insite to into boxing so i can earn a bit of money whilst enjoying watching an excellent sport i was doing pretty well thanks to all of your knowlegable advice that was until i happened to log on to mr"cant pick his nose" biltons sporting life boxing tippping site mr bilton seemed as if he knew his stuff so i 4t i would follow his advice. and oh my god what a mistake that was i know you cant get every decision right but come on mr bilton the goods or whoever you are what planet are you from i cant believe that such a well regarded firm as the one you work for could hire such a baffoon to advise us on what to gamble our hard earned cash on and you havn,t even got the decency to apolagise for your disastrous predictions i cant believe your employers have stood for your pathetic predictions for so long i think you must get your inspiration from playing a playstation infact i know what you do. you close your eyes and stick a pin in a name oops you cant do that cos then you would get around 50% right instead of 5% do us all a favour and dissapear derek
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45231
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Graham Houston seems pretty reliable thus far. He didn't get Winky v Taylor right (nobody except Doug Fischer at maxboxing did), or Tarver v Hop, but these were not the results people expect.prometheus wrote:While the above posts would strongly seem to suggest that Mr Bilton may be somewhat less than s great boxing tipster... on a sidenote, is anyone aware of any 'good' boxing tipsters in the media, I don't expect any media pundit to be a Nostradamus, just curious etc.
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13284
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Yes, year in year out Houston gets more right than anyone else I've ever read. He hardly ever gets them wrong, and those two mentioned above were very hard calls to get 100% spot on.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Graham Houston seems pretty reliable thus far. He didn't get Winky v Taylor right (nobody except Doug Fischer at maxboxing did), or Tarver v Hop, but these were not the results people expect.prometheus wrote:While the above posts would strongly seem to suggest that Mr Bilton may be somewhat less than s great boxing tipster... on a sidenote, is anyone aware of any 'good' boxing tipsters in the media, I don't expect any media pundit to be a Nostradamus, just curious etc.
Where does Graham Houston do previews - on a website or do you mean stuff in Boxing Monthly.
On the Mr Bilton mini-saga, this thread has drawn out a few people with 'Posts: 1' by their name. I smell a rat.
Leave the poor sod alone. You don't have to take his advice. Don't take mine either. Another 50 down the drain on Winky. Taylor far better than I expected.
On the Mr Bilton mini-saga, this thread has drawn out a few people with 'Posts: 1' by their name. I smell a rat.
Leave the poor sod alone. You don't have to take his advice. Don't take mine either. Another 50 down the drain on Winky. Taylor far better than I expected.
http://www.fightwriter.comIan 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Where does Graham Houston do previews - on a website or do you mean stuff in Boxing Monthly.
Well worth a read.
Cheers states. Need to start making some money back. Having a mare of a year. Even when I think I call 'em right (Skelton-Williams) I do my brains. Will certainly check out that site.states wrote:http://www.fightwriter.comIan 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Where does Graham Houston do previews - on a website or do you mean stuff in Boxing Monthly.
Well worth a read.
A few on weekly betting thread in the current scene forum went for the draw on Taylor-Wright. Armageto usually puts up what he thinks are good plays, he's had some good wins recently and he's pretty consistent , pop in next week 
Last edited by lvlarc on 19 Jun 2006, 15:57, edited 1 time in total.
Exactly what I am thinking, I can guarentee that Mr Bilton has posted on this forum on at least one occasion- but it is not for me to say what user name as that is up to him. I will say that I cannot GUARENTEE that any of the username's posting on this particular thread are him.Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote: On the Mr Bilton mini-saga, this thread has drawn out a few people with 'Posts: 1' by their name. I smell a rat.
Leave the poor sod alone. You don't have to take his advice. Don't take mine either. Another 50 down the drain on Winky. Taylor far better than I expected.
Agree with the rest of your post also, just because he isn't right all of the time doesn't mean he knows nout about the game. I've apparently, earned some US gambler shit loads on British/European fights via e-mail - still didn't stop me from putting a wager on Mario Veit to beat Joe Calzaghe in their first meeting.
-
larry cake
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 118
- Joined: 18 Jun 2006, 06:42
on the subject of DEREK BILTON i made a post on the website regarding him and i am just confirming that i am part of no conspiracy to degrade him, but after reading some of the other posts i am now of the opinion that somthing underhand may be occouring, but i must admit that i thought "garethdooley"s post was hilarious.
-
punchers chance
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 693
- Joined: 12 Jul 2005, 18:37
-
prometheus
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15
- Joined: 13 Sep 2004, 07:36
-
prometheus
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15
- Joined: 13 Sep 2004, 07:36
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13284
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
The point is he's giving you value for money on long(ish) shots...that have a fair chance of coming off ( ie not impossible like Winky to win by 1st round KO last week for instance ) it's not meant to be taken as gospel is it - though some simple souls seem to see it this way
See it in those terms, and his picks look ok to me - though of course 20/20 hindsight makes anyone a genius.
If you want the bleeding obvious, ask down at the pub.
See it in those terms, and his picks look ok to me - though of course 20/20 hindsight makes anyone a genius.
If you want the bleeding obvious, ask down at the pub.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45231
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
I take your point. It's always tempting to go for the long shots, but only when there's a reasonable chance of them coming off.
Betting on boxing is only really interesting if you've either got shit loads of cash to bet on a favourite, or there are lots of long shots you want to spread around on. These come off more seldom, but you can get cracking odds on round by round KO's.
Betting on boxing is only really interesting if you've either got shit loads of cash to bet on a favourite, or there are lots of long shots you want to spread around on. These come off more seldom, but you can get cracking odds on round by round KO's.
I have had a couple of good wins lately - Hopkins to beat Tarver at 3/1, and Taylor & Winky draw at 20/1. Also sent the latter onto a few mates who done well out of it. Always thought it would be a close fight and said in my message that I expected it to be so close that if either guy won it, it would be 7-5 in rounds. I told them the chances of a draw IMO were probably 1 in 4 for that bout so 20/1 was great value. Not sure if I posted this in here anywhere but I may have.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Graham Houston seems pretty reliable thus far. He didn't get Winky v Taylor right (nobody except Doug Fischer at maxboxing did), or Tarver v Hop, but these were not the results people expect.prometheus wrote:While the above posts would strongly seem to suggest that Mr Bilton may be somewhat less than s great boxing tipster... on a sidenote, is anyone aware of any 'good' boxing tipsters in the media, I don't expect any media pundit to be a Nostradamus, just curious etc.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45231
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Wish I'd put a tenner on the sodding draw now.johnswan1 wrote:I have had a couple of good wins lately - Hopkins to beat Tarver at 3/1, and Taylor & Winky draw at 20/1. Also sent the latter onto a few mates who done well out of it. Always thought it would be a close fight and said in my message that I expected it to be so close that if either guy won it, it would be 7-5 in rounds. I told them the chances of a draw IMO were probably 1 in 4 for that bout so 20/1 was great value. Not sure if I posted this in here anywhere but I may have.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Graham Houston seems pretty reliable thus far. He didn't get Winky v Taylor right (nobody except Doug Fischer at maxboxing did), or Tarver v Hop, but these were not the results people expect.prometheus wrote:While the above posts would strongly seem to suggest that Mr Bilton may be somewhat less than s great boxing tipster... on a sidenote, is anyone aware of any 'good' boxing tipsters in the media, I don't expect any media pundit to be a Nostradamus, just curious etc.
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Value for money? where?.....value for money is when you get something in exchange for cash that is considered to be a bargain, I would not class constent losers "value for money"MightyWarrior wrote:The point is he's giving you value for money on long(ish) shots...that have a fair chance of coming off ( ie not impossible like Winky to win by 1st round KO last week for instance ) it's not meant to be taken as gospel is it - though some simple souls seem to see it this way![]()
See it in those terms, and his picks look ok to me - though of course 20/20 hindsight makes anyone a genius.
If you want the bleeding obvious, ask down at the pub.
Winky Wright winning in round 1
as far as asking down the pub the local alky's talk more sense so you could be correct
Last edited by Hagler2002 on 21 Jun 2006, 08:28, edited 1 time in total.
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
james you always do this, bemoan that you were 'about to get a bet on' but didn't for whatever reason. I'm telling you now, bet on AJAMU and don't miss outjamesmcdonnell wrote:Wish I'd put a tenner on the sodding draw now.johnswan1 wrote:I have had a couple of good wins lately - Hopkins to beat Tarver at 3/1, and Taylor & Winky draw at 20/1. Also sent the latter onto a few mates who done well out of it. Always thought it would be a close fight and said in my message that I expected it to be so close that if either guy won it, it would be 7-5 in rounds. I told them the chances of a draw IMO were probably 1 in 4 for that bout so 20/1 was great value. Not sure if I posted this in here anywhere but I may have.jamesmcdonnell wrote: Graham Houston seems pretty reliable thus far. He didn't get Winky v Taylor right (nobody except Doug Fischer at maxboxing did), or Tarver v Hop, but these were not the results people expect.:(
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45231
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Yes, yes. If you were a true betting man, you would know the unwritten rules. One of them is never to come out with 'I wish...', especially when you are up on the deal anyway.Hagler2k6 wrote:I had £8 on Wright to win and £2 on the Draw at 25/1, wish I had put it on the other way around :(
Bad form. Enjoy the £42 you are up.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45231
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11