True, but it's the behaviour.Tony1244 wrote: ↑26 May 2020, 16:51EO would never say, "I'd have no way of knowing."oogiebe wrote: ↑26 May 2020, 16:48
We are all terrified. But you still don't answer my question. You obvious lack of courage means I win. LMFAO!
BTW: I've always felt that EO reminded me of someone and I couldn't figure it out. I did just now. Captain Queeg from "Caine Mutiny" as he became unglued at the courtmartial. LMFAO! I'ts spot on!
Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
-
Thomastearns
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2401
- Joined: 26 Feb 2017, 11:11
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
oogiebe wrote: ↑26 May 2020, 16:31All people drink water. All people die. Water makes you die. That generally says it all for EO's logic.Tony1244 wrote: ↑26 May 2020, 12:38
He talks about red herring arguments; he is the master of that. His "logic" is Liston never beat anyone who weighed more than 230, so therefore he couldn't have beaten anyone who weighed more than 230.
He doesn't like facts such as Liston's and Louis' best opponents, weren't their biggest opponents.
Yes, generalisation and logic are easily confused, but they are not the same thing.
It's also known as 'jumping to the wrong conclusion', as many a policeman the world over has no doubt later discovered to his embarrassment.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15097
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
It's not just him; though look at the poll numbers some far. Only four people have number 1.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39207
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
Nothing wrong with that at all, is it bothering you a bit alp that not everyone just defaults him to 1Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑26 May 2020, 17:46 It's not just him; though look at the poll numbers some far. Only four people have number 1.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15097
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
Only because it's pretty obvious. I have this crazy notion that ability actually matters. Only four people have number 1. 7 people actually don't think he would crack the top 8.
We have gotton to that point. Just look at the scales, nothing more to think about.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39207
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
The majority have him top 5, I rarely see people who say it's only size that matter. Saying just that size matters is fair and reasonable, not something that should be ignored
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
Opinions are fine. Most have him 2-5. At least no one else is going off the deep end saying Liston only fought CW's.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39207
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
LOL! C'mon...he didn't say that.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑26 May 2020, 17:512-5 isn't enough god dammnit!! alp needs him #1 or else everyone is just an idiot !!!
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39207
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
Lol, but only 4 people have him #1! such an know nothing injustice! waah 
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
I guess I'm an idiot then. I had him 2-5.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑26 May 2020, 17:54 Lol, but only 4 people have him #1! such an know nothing injustice! waah![]()
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39207
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
Absolutely nothing wrong with that, only a true idiot would think sooogiebe wrote: ↑26 May 2020, 17:54I guess I'm an idiot then. I had him 2-5.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑26 May 2020, 17:54 Lol, but only 4 people have him #1! such an know nothing injustice! waah![]()
Slick Cleveland Williams !!
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15097
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
You have started at least three Cleveland Williams threads so far. Time for another?
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39207
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
Hell ya bruh, I love myself some of sweet pea Willy , thanks for the suggestion , you have some good ideas when you're not moaning for a changeAmbling Alp II wrote: ↑26 May 2020, 18:04 You have started at least three Cleveland Williams threads so far. Time for another?
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
If Cleveland Williams was fat and 245, some people would be giving Liston more credit. As others alluded to, some of the modern size difference is simply being fat!Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑26 May 2020, 18:04 You have started at least three Cleveland Williams threads so far. Time for another?
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
In many cases that's exactly what it is.Tony1244 wrote: ↑26 May 2020, 18:25If Cleveland Williams was fat and 245, some people would be giving Liston more credit. As others alluded to, some of the modern size difference is simply being fat!Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑26 May 2020, 18:04 You have started at least three Cleveland Williams threads so far. Time for another?
Sonny Liston could've easily been 235 pounds, he just wouldn't have had as much stamina, wouldn't have been as fast...etc.
Having extra weight just because you can shouldn't be the goal, and to a select few. It's not.
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
How many really good big men have there've been so far? The 2 Klit brothers, LL, and Fury. Am I missing anyone?
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
Yeah, I guess AJ is pretty big too. Wilder is big enough to compete with Fury and AJ. We all agree another division is moronic.
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
I know exactly what would happen. Some fat fvck like Ruiz or freak show giant like Valuev would be "Super" champion.
He'd have no chance in the ring against the real HW champion, but the idiots would think bigger is better.
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
Regardless of who The Top Dog is. He should always be known as "The Heavyweight Champion of the World"
Not Super Heavyweight. Not Strikeweight. Not any of that horsesh*t.
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
Perhaps the CW division limit needs to be increased slowly over the decades. But no more divisions and the Heavyweight champion is the lead dawg.
Re: Sonny Liston (1963) vs. current HWs ?
No. Cruiserweight has already been increased from 190 to 200.
All Time great Heavyweight Champions weighed less than what the Cruiserweight division is now. Leave it alone.