Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post Reply
Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3476
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by Cent0089 »

Mike Perez weighed 230-240 in heavy and he was able to cut down to cruiser.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39212
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by margaret thatcher »

gilgamesh wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 16:35 The point is. It's been done before. It can be done again.

Guys that are 210 pounds didn't suddenly become Lightweights.

Mike Tyson has been the biggest Heavyweight star of the last 3 decades easily. He was always considered small for a Heavyweight.
Nah, the point is that guys around 6'0 185-200 are actually where we should be looking. Not simply that they could do it, but that they are the ideal sized HWs. These giants are just lugging detrimental size, any guy around 200 should have the mass to hurt any other man.

In general 6'1 197 > 6'5 240
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by gilgamesh »

margaret thatcher wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 16:43
gilgamesh wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 16:35 The point is. It's been done before. It can be done again.

Guys that are 210 pounds didn't suddenly become Lightweights.

Mike Tyson has been the biggest Heavyweight star of the last 3 decades easily. He was always considered small for a Heavyweight.
Nah, the point is that guys around 6'0 185-200 are actually where we should be looking. Not simply that they could do it, but that they are the ideal sized HWs. These giants are just lugging detrimental size, any guy around 200 should have the mass to hurt any other man.

In general 6'1 197 > 6'5 240
Is this sarcasm? Or just an odd statement
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39212
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by margaret thatcher »

Look at history, and how SHWs have fared with smaller hws, most time the smaller wins. These shws are for the most part not the right build for boxing and have a lot of excess size. This is just the history of boxing.

Granted, guys in the Jack Johnson opponent size range of 150-170 would have been too small.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24631
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by Tony1244 »

gilgamesh wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 16:35 The point is. It's been done before. It can be done again.

Guys that are 210 pounds didn't suddenly become Lightweights.

Mike Tyson has been the biggest Heavyweight star of the last 3 decades easily. He was always considered small for a Heavyweight.
Yes, Tyson is the best of the dozen or so EO exceptions. :OhYes:
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by oogiebe »

Tony1244 wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 17:22
gilgamesh wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 16:35 The point is. It's been done before. It can be done again.

Guys that are 210 pounds didn't suddenly become Lightweights.

Mike Tyson has been the biggest Heavyweight star of the last 3 decades easily. He was always considered small for a Heavyweight.
Yes, Tyson is the best of the dozen or so EO exceptions. :OhYes:
E-i-E-i-O
H8Usernames
Featherweight
Posts: 1196
Joined: 21 Mar 2020, 21:02

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by H8Usernames »

My opinion is a minority one I admit but its still my opinion. So I believe that boxing should be a sport like any other and not just some money thing made to produce stars. That being said weight classes are to protect smaller fighters against the size advantage that bigger fighters enjoy, I dont think that larger men should be less protected than smaller ones so weight classes should follow something like a 8.5% incriment, that being said:

Lightheavyweight 175
Jr Cruiserweight 190
Cruiserweight 205
Supercruiserweight 220
Heavyweight 221 and above.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by oogiebe »

H8Usernames wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 17:29 My opinion is a minority one I admit but its still my opinion. So I believe that boxing should be a sport like any other and not just some money thing made to produce stars. That being said weight classes are to protect smaller fighters against the size advantage that bigger fighters enjoy, I dont think that larger men should be less protected than smaller ones so weight classes should follow something like a 8.5% incriment, that being said:

Lightheavyweight 175
Jr Cruiserweight 190
Cruiserweight 205
Supercruiserweight 220
Heavyweight 221 and above.
Fantastic! Two new weight classes. :doh:
Paci
Middleweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 09:49

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by Paci »

Enough with junior and super-weights... Don't make the WBA look reasonable please.

Wondering what new type of belt they will throw in the mix or something this up coming convention.
Last edited by Paci on 09 Jun 2020, 17:38, edited 1 time in total.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by gilgamesh »

H8Usernames wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 17:29 My opinion is a minority one I admit but its still my opinion. So I believe that boxing should be a sport like any other and not just some money thing made to produce stars. That being said weight classes are to protect smaller fighters against the size advantage that bigger fighters enjoy, I dont think that larger men should be less protected than smaller ones so weight classes should follow something like a 8.5% incriment, that being said:

Lightheavyweight 175
Jr Cruiserweight 190
Cruiserweight 205
Supercruiserweight 220
Heavyweight 221 and above.
You and your sh*t idea of Jr. Cruiserweight and Super Cruiserweight can go to hell.

LESS weight classes. Not more. Never more.
H8Usernames
Featherweight
Posts: 1196
Joined: 21 Mar 2020, 21:02

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by H8Usernames »

gilgamesh wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 17:38 You and your sh*t idea of Jr. Cruiserweight and Super Cruiserweight can go to hell.

LESS weight classes. Not more. Never more.
Thank you so much for your kind words.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by gilgamesh »

H8Usernames wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 17:52
gilgamesh wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 17:38 You and your sh*t idea of Jr. Cruiserweight and Super Cruiserweight can go to hell.

LESS weight classes. Not more. Never more.
Thank you so much for your kind words.
And I'd thank you to quit trying to sully the sport I love.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15097
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

At a certain point the weight advantage stops being an advantage. At a later point it becomes a disadvantage. Has been shown over and over and over.

No needs for more weight classes. We need less if anything.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by gilgamesh »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 17:53 At a certain point the weight advantage stops being an advantage. At a later point it becomes a disadvantage. Has been shown over and over and over.

No needs for more weight classes. We need less if anything.
No doubt about it we need less. All the Jr. and Super weight classes could be dropped and wouldn't be missed.

We could also lose every one of the title organizations. All of the them have been shown to be corrupt in some fashion over the years.

Of course this is all just dreaming, but hopefully one day we'll see an improvement to the way the sport is structured.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24631
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by Tony1244 »

H8Usernames wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 17:29 My opinion is a minority one I admit but its still my opinion. So I believe that boxing should be a sport like any other and not just some money thing made to produce stars. That being said weight classes are to protect smaller fighters against the size advantage that bigger fighters enjoy, I dont think that larger men should be less protected than smaller ones so weight classes should follow something like a 8.5% incriment, that being said:

Lightheavyweight 175
Jr Cruiserweight 190
Cruiserweight 205
Supercruiserweight 220
Heavyweight 221 and above.
How about adding in super light heavyweight @ 180 and Senior Cruiser @ 209? :brick:

Or.......

How about getting rid of ALL Junior and Supper divisions !
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by oogiebe »

Tony1244 wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 18:28
H8Usernames wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 17:29 My opinion is a minority one I admit but its still my opinion. So I believe that boxing should be a sport like any other and not just some money thing made to produce stars. That being said weight classes are to protect smaller fighters against the size advantage that bigger fighters enjoy, I dont think that larger men should be less protected than smaller ones so weight classes should follow something like a 8.5% incriment, that being said:

Lightheavyweight 175
Jr Cruiserweight 190
Cruiserweight 205
Supercruiserweight 220
Heavyweight 221 and above.
How about adding in super light heavyweight @ 180 and Senior Cruiser @ 209? :brick:

Or.......

How about getting rid of ALL Junior and Supper divisions !
Maybe replace "JR" with "Not quite good enough to be..."
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24631
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by Tony1244 »

oogiebe wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 18:37
Tony1244 wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 18:28

How about adding in super light heavyweight @ 180 and Senior Cruiser @ 209? :brick:

Or.......

How about getting rid of ALL Junior and Supper divisions !
Maybe replace "JR" with "Not quite good enough to be..."
"Size matter," so perhaps each pound, no wait, each 1/2 pound should have it's own division. :maybe:

And any division that is bigger than HW, should be called the fat piece of sh!t division.
Last edited by Tony1244 on 09 Jun 2020, 18:40, edited 1 time in total.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by oogiebe »

Tony1244 wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 18:39
oogiebe wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 18:37

Maybe replace "JR" with "Not quite good enough to be..."
"Size matter," so perhaps each pound, no wait, each 1/2 pound should have it's own division. :maybe:
After that we can work on reach and height classes.
Paci
Middleweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 09:49

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by Paci »

Heightclasses makes alot of sense.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by Enlightened-One »

Tony1244 wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 17:22 Yes, Tyson is the best of the dozen or so EO exceptions. :OhYes:
Never said that.

It didn’t happen... ever.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by Enlightened-One »

Just a gentle reminder to what I actually wrote.

Some interesting stats for those that claim that size doesn’t matter…

The following list represents the weights of the winners/champions of the world heavyweight title fights (including the WBA variants) that occurred within the last twenty years (i.e. since the 9th June 2000):

• WBA = 50 title fights; 2 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 3 winners weighing less than 220lbs
• WBC = 38 title fights; 2 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 4 winners weighing less than 220lbs
• IBF = 40 title fights; 5 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 5 winners weighing less than 220lbs
• WBO = 30 title fights; 0 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 1 winner weighing less than 220lbs

Here are the mathematical average weights for the winners/champions of all those title fights (rounded to the nearest pound):

• WBA = 247lbs
• WBC = 240lbs
• IBF = 242lbs
• WBO = 242lbs

Here are the champions (weighing less than 220lbs) that emerged victorious (or drew) in the title fights mentioned above:

• David Haye
• Roy Jones Jr
• Deontay Wilder
• Chris Byrd
• Sultan Ibragimov

David Haye and Deontay Wilder are the only fighters that successfully competed in world heavyweight title fights within the last decade weighing less than 225lbs.

If people are questioning the validity of these stats, I can easily provide the dates, names (of the winners) and weights for each of these title fights.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24631
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by Tony1244 »

Enlightened-One wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 18:42
Tony1244 wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 17:22 Yes, Tyson is the best of the dozen or so EO exceptions. :OhYes:
Never said that.

It didn’t happen... ever.
I'd go with Holy.
Paci
Middleweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 09:49

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by Paci »

Enlightened-One wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 18:44 Just a gentle reminder to what I actually wrote.

Some interesting stats for those that claim that size doesn’t matter…

The following list represents the weights of the winners/champions of the world heavyweight title fights (including the WBA variants) that occurred within the last twenty years (i.e. since the 9th June 2000):

• WBA = 50 title fights; 2 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 3 winners weighing less than 220lbs
• WBC = 38 title fights; 2 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 4 winners weighing less than 220lbs
• IBF = 40 title fights; 5 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 5 winners weighing less than 220lbs
• WBO = 30 title fights; 0 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 1 winner weighing less than 220lbs

Here are the mathematical average weights for the winners/champions of all those title fights (rounded to the nearest pound):

• WBA = 247lbs
• WBC = 240lbs
• IBF = 242lbs
• WBO = 242lbs

Here are the champions (weighing less than 220lbs) that emerged victorious (or drew) in the title fights mentioned above:

• David Haye
• Roy Jones Jr
• Deontay Wilder
• Chris Byrd
• Sultan Ibragimov

David Haye and Deontay Wilder are the only fighters that successfully competed in world heavyweight title fights within the last decade weighing less than 225lbs.

If people are questioning the validity of these stats, I can easily provide the dates, names (of the winners) and weights for each of these title fights.
Lies, damned lies, and statistics
jujigatame
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7436
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by jujigatame »

Those "statistics" don't even support the argument. So the average heavyweight champ weighs 240-245. Fine. Let's say that's the optimal weight for combat sports. Well, someone who weighs 245 can weigh in at 225 without much trouble if they want to. So what have you done? Created a worthless SHW division with almost nobody in it, and cheapened the HW division while you're at it. Truly a win-win.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?

Post by oogiebe »

jujigatame wrote: 09 Jun 2020, 20:54 Those "statistics" don't even support the argument. So the average heavyweight champ weighs 240-245. Fine. Let's say that's the optimal weight for combat sports. Well, someone who weighs 245 can weigh in at 225 without much trouble if they want to. So what have you done? Created a worthless SHW division with almost nobody in it, and cheapened the HW division while you're at it. Truly a win-win.
Most of these plus 240 heavy's are at least 15 - 20 LBs overweight.
Post Reply