Is it time for super heavyweight division?
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
Mike Perez weighed 230-240 in heavy and he was able to cut down to cruiser.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39211
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
Nah, the point is that guys around 6'0 185-200 are actually where we should be looking. Not simply that they could do it, but that they are the ideal sized HWs. These giants are just lugging detrimental size, any guy around 200 should have the mass to hurt any other man.
In general 6'1 197 > 6'5 240
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
Is this sarcasm? Or just an odd statementmargaret thatcher wrote: ↑09 Jun 2020, 16:43Nah, the point is that guys around 6'0 185-200 are actually where we should be looking. Not simply that they could do it, but that they are the ideal sized HWs. These giants are just lugging detrimental size, any guy around 200 should have the mass to hurt any other man.
In general 6'1 197 > 6'5 240
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39211
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
Look at history, and how SHWs have fared with smaller hws, most time the smaller wins. These shws are for the most part not the right build for boxing and have a lot of excess size. This is just the history of boxing.
Granted, guys in the Jack Johnson opponent size range of 150-170 would have been too small.
Granted, guys in the Jack Johnson opponent size range of 150-170 would have been too small.
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
Yes, Tyson is the best of the dozen or so EO exceptions.
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
-
H8Usernames
- Featherweight
- Posts: 1196
- Joined: 21 Mar 2020, 21:02
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
My opinion is a minority one I admit but its still my opinion. So I believe that boxing should be a sport like any other and not just some money thing made to produce stars. That being said weight classes are to protect smaller fighters against the size advantage that bigger fighters enjoy, I dont think that larger men should be less protected than smaller ones so weight classes should follow something like a 8.5% incriment, that being said:
Lightheavyweight 175
Jr Cruiserweight 190
Cruiserweight 205
Supercruiserweight 220
Heavyweight 221 and above.
Lightheavyweight 175
Jr Cruiserweight 190
Cruiserweight 205
Supercruiserweight 220
Heavyweight 221 and above.
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
Fantastic! Two new weight classes.H8Usernames wrote: ↑09 Jun 2020, 17:29 My opinion is a minority one I admit but its still my opinion. So I believe that boxing should be a sport like any other and not just some money thing made to produce stars. That being said weight classes are to protect smaller fighters against the size advantage that bigger fighters enjoy, I dont think that larger men should be less protected than smaller ones so weight classes should follow something like a 8.5% incriment, that being said:
Lightheavyweight 175
Jr Cruiserweight 190
Cruiserweight 205
Supercruiserweight 220
Heavyweight 221 and above.
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
Enough with junior and super-weights... Don't make the WBA look reasonable please.
Wondering what new type of belt they will throw in the mix or something this up coming convention.
Wondering what new type of belt they will throw in the mix or something this up coming convention.
Last edited by Paci on 09 Jun 2020, 17:38, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
You and your sh*t idea of Jr. Cruiserweight and Super Cruiserweight can go to hell.H8Usernames wrote: ↑09 Jun 2020, 17:29 My opinion is a minority one I admit but its still my opinion. So I believe that boxing should be a sport like any other and not just some money thing made to produce stars. That being said weight classes are to protect smaller fighters against the size advantage that bigger fighters enjoy, I dont think that larger men should be less protected than smaller ones so weight classes should follow something like a 8.5% incriment, that being said:
Lightheavyweight 175
Jr Cruiserweight 190
Cruiserweight 205
Supercruiserweight 220
Heavyweight 221 and above.
LESS weight classes. Not more. Never more.
-
H8Usernames
- Featherweight
- Posts: 1196
- Joined: 21 Mar 2020, 21:02
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
And I'd thank you to quit trying to sully the sport I love.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15097
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
At a certain point the weight advantage stops being an advantage. At a later point it becomes a disadvantage. Has been shown over and over and over.
No needs for more weight classes. We need less if anything.
No needs for more weight classes. We need less if anything.
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
No doubt about it we need less. All the Jr. and Super weight classes could be dropped and wouldn't be missed.Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑09 Jun 2020, 17:53 At a certain point the weight advantage stops being an advantage. At a later point it becomes a disadvantage. Has been shown over and over and over.
No needs for more weight classes. We need less if anything.
We could also lose every one of the title organizations. All of the them have been shown to be corrupt in some fashion over the years.
Of course this is all just dreaming, but hopefully one day we'll see an improvement to the way the sport is structured.
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
How about adding in super light heavyweight @ 180 and Senior Cruiser @ 209?H8Usernames wrote: ↑09 Jun 2020, 17:29 My opinion is a minority one I admit but its still my opinion. So I believe that boxing should be a sport like any other and not just some money thing made to produce stars. That being said weight classes are to protect smaller fighters against the size advantage that bigger fighters enjoy, I dont think that larger men should be less protected than smaller ones so weight classes should follow something like a 8.5% incriment, that being said:
Lightheavyweight 175
Jr Cruiserweight 190
Cruiserweight 205
Supercruiserweight 220
Heavyweight 221 and above.
Or.......
How about getting rid of ALL Junior and Supper divisions !
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
Maybe replace "JR" with "Not quite good enough to be..."Tony1244 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2020, 18:28How about adding in super light heavyweight @ 180 and Senior Cruiser @ 209?H8Usernames wrote: ↑09 Jun 2020, 17:29 My opinion is a minority one I admit but its still my opinion. So I believe that boxing should be a sport like any other and not just some money thing made to produce stars. That being said weight classes are to protect smaller fighters against the size advantage that bigger fighters enjoy, I dont think that larger men should be less protected than smaller ones so weight classes should follow something like a 8.5% incriment, that being said:
Lightheavyweight 175
Jr Cruiserweight 190
Cruiserweight 205
Supercruiserweight 220
Heavyweight 221 and above.![]()
Or.......
How about getting rid of ALL Junior and Supper divisions !
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
"Size matter," so perhaps each pound, no wait, each 1/2 pound should have it's own division.
And any division that is bigger than HW, should be called the fat piece of sh!t division.
Last edited by Tony1244 on 09 Jun 2020, 18:40, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
Heightclasses makes alot of sense.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
Just a gentle reminder to what I actually wrote.
Some interesting stats for those that claim that size doesn’t matter…
The following list represents the weights of the winners/champions of the world heavyweight title fights (including the WBA variants) that occurred within the last twenty years (i.e. since the 9th June 2000):
• WBA = 50 title fights; 2 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 3 winners weighing less than 220lbs
• WBC = 38 title fights; 2 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 4 winners weighing less than 220lbs
• IBF = 40 title fights; 5 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 5 winners weighing less than 220lbs
• WBO = 30 title fights; 0 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 1 winner weighing less than 220lbs
Here are the mathematical average weights for the winners/champions of all those title fights (rounded to the nearest pound):
• WBA = 247lbs
• WBC = 240lbs
• IBF = 242lbs
• WBO = 242lbs
Here are the champions (weighing less than 220lbs) that emerged victorious (or drew) in the title fights mentioned above:
• David Haye
• Roy Jones Jr
• Deontay Wilder
• Chris Byrd
• Sultan Ibragimov
David Haye and Deontay Wilder are the only fighters that successfully competed in world heavyweight title fights within the last decade weighing less than 225lbs.
If people are questioning the validity of these stats, I can easily provide the dates, names (of the winners) and weights for each of these title fights.
Some interesting stats for those that claim that size doesn’t matter…
The following list represents the weights of the winners/champions of the world heavyweight title fights (including the WBA variants) that occurred within the last twenty years (i.e. since the 9th June 2000):
• WBA = 50 title fights; 2 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 3 winners weighing less than 220lbs
• WBC = 38 title fights; 2 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 4 winners weighing less than 220lbs
• IBF = 40 title fights; 5 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 5 winners weighing less than 220lbs
• WBO = 30 title fights; 0 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 1 winner weighing less than 220lbs
Here are the mathematical average weights for the winners/champions of all those title fights (rounded to the nearest pound):
• WBA = 247lbs
• WBC = 240lbs
• IBF = 242lbs
• WBO = 242lbs
Here are the champions (weighing less than 220lbs) that emerged victorious (or drew) in the title fights mentioned above:
• David Haye
• Roy Jones Jr
• Deontay Wilder
• Chris Byrd
• Sultan Ibragimov
David Haye and Deontay Wilder are the only fighters that successfully competed in world heavyweight title fights within the last decade weighing less than 225lbs.
If people are questioning the validity of these stats, I can easily provide the dates, names (of the winners) and weights for each of these title fights.
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
I'd go with Holy.
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
Lies, damned lies, and statisticsEnlightened-One wrote: ↑09 Jun 2020, 18:44 Just a gentle reminder to what I actually wrote.
Some interesting stats for those that claim that size doesn’t matter…
The following list represents the weights of the winners/champions of the world heavyweight title fights (including the WBA variants) that occurred within the last twenty years (i.e. since the 9th June 2000):
• WBA = 50 title fights; 2 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 3 winners weighing less than 220lbs
• WBC = 38 title fights; 2 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 4 winners weighing less than 220lbs
• IBF = 40 title fights; 5 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 5 winners weighing less than 220lbs
• WBO = 30 title fights; 0 winners weighing less than 215lbs; 1 winner weighing less than 220lbs
Here are the mathematical average weights for the winners/champions of all those title fights (rounded to the nearest pound):
• WBA = 247lbs
• WBC = 240lbs
• IBF = 242lbs
• WBO = 242lbs
Here are the champions (weighing less than 220lbs) that emerged victorious (or drew) in the title fights mentioned above:
• David Haye
• Roy Jones Jr
• Deontay Wilder
• Chris Byrd
• Sultan Ibragimov
David Haye and Deontay Wilder are the only fighters that successfully competed in world heavyweight title fights within the last decade weighing less than 225lbs.
If people are questioning the validity of these stats, I can easily provide the dates, names (of the winners) and weights for each of these title fights.
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7436
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
Those "statistics" don't even support the argument. So the average heavyweight champ weighs 240-245. Fine. Let's say that's the optimal weight for combat sports. Well, someone who weighs 245 can weigh in at 225 without much trouble if they want to. So what have you done? Created a worthless SHW division with almost nobody in it, and cheapened the HW division while you're at it. Truly a win-win.
Re: Is it time for super heavyweight division?
Most of these plus 240 heavy's are at least 15 - 20 LBs overweight.jujigatame wrote: ↑09 Jun 2020, 20:54 Those "statistics" don't even support the argument. So the average heavyweight champ weighs 240-245. Fine. Let's say that's the optimal weight for combat sports. Well, someone who weighs 245 can weigh in at 225 without much trouble if they want to. So what have you done? Created a worthless SHW division with almost nobody in it, and cheapened the HW division while you're at it. Truly a win-win.