Enlightened-One wrote: ↑08 Jun 2020, 07:59
Thomastearns wrote: ↑08 Jun 2020, 07:50
Of all the idiotic things you have ever written, this may be the worst.
You don't know Mike Tyson, only some third hand impression.
You wouldn't last 10 minutes in his world.
Me neither.
Of all the idiotic things you have ever written, this may be the worst.
Have you seen Deontay Wilder's comments about Mike Tyson?
When I said that I wasn't really sure how Mike could help Deontay, I really did mean it!
You can criticise me all you want and claim that I don’t know anything about blah, blah, blah… but you need to refrain from behaving in an idiotic manner, by realising that Deontay Wilder doesn’t respect Mike Tyson.
So when this is the case, how the fṹck can Mike Tyson help Deontay Wilder?
If you can't answer that simple question, then please either remain silent or man up and apologise!
"Deontay Wilder gives savage assessment of Mike Tyson’s career in classic video, talks defeats to Evander Holyfield and Lennox Lewis"
"Deontay Wilder claims he would knock out Mike Tyson in his prime because of his attributes and ‘killer instinct’"
From a sporting perspective, Mike Tyson never managed to overcome adversity. You can't pretend otherwise!
And in terms of Mike’s ability to support and advise Wilder, he clearly can’t do this if Wilder doesn’t even respect him! You can't pretend otherwise!
I’m really looking forward to your response, because you’ve clearly fallen into a trap of your own making!
Look, I have no interest in discussing whichever trap I may have fallen into or who set it. There are far too many examples here on boxrec, not all of them humourous, of your desperate pedantic excavation attempts to discern whatever truth or version of reality that corresponds to your current paradigm.
We've all seen (far too many times where these exchanges usually lead) - an eventual derailment somewhere down the track of semantic misunderstanding. Just in time to usually catch the next exchange to nowheresville.
Remember also that all of these discussions can only be at best a form of social science. Sadly there can never be an ultimate truth - merely a current consensus which might be no more permanent as the direction of the clouds.
As a common fan of boxing I'd like to wish you well. I believe you are at your best with unearthing factual information and detail about this sport that some of us may have missed. I think you might do well for your own happiness to stick to that more often. We all know you're tough, but do you really need this constant headbanging? I'm pretty sure we don't.
Anyway, what I am interested in is Deontay Wilder defeating that fork tongued manipulative drug cheat Tyson Fury in their second rematch.
I think it's clear to most observers that Wilder has successfully managed to isolate himself from almost everyone that might have had his interests at heart.
Broken relationship after broken relationship, new celebrity fiancee/wife who seems to have a huge new found interest in boxing, the loss of a trusted mentor, and heck he even tried to fire the only good man left standing in his camp - his trainer.
Dibella had to go 'cos Haymon, Finkel and co all wanted the dough.
To really cap things of, he even shares the same common (mis)manager with Mike Tyson in Shelley Finkel.
Deontay Wilder's story is now beginning to closely mirror that of Mike Tyson. A young man isolated, flailing, about to drown surrounded by parasites.
Unless something changes some of us can predict the rest. We've seen something similar before.
So yes, he should eat serious humble pie and go talk to the man who's seen it all, done it all, and lived to tell the tale.
Nothing to lose, and everything to gain.