Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

#1
49
64%
#2-5
20
26%
#6-8
3
4%
#9-10
1
1%
# 11 and under
3
4%
 
Total votes: 76

margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by margaret thatcher »

Ya, even without your opinion (uppercut to death) or mine (wilder ktfo!) Fury was the underdog. You coulda won well by betting on him. It's 4 fights he's been dog and he hasn't lost 1 of them, and he's won every fight he was favoured for. I mean, I'm not saying he's GOAT or anything, but if anything that's more so an under estimated fighter than an overrated one
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by oogiebe »

margaret thatcher wrote: 25 Jun 2020, 19:21 Ya, even without your opinion (uppercut to death) or mine (wilder ktfo!) Fury was the underdog. You coulda won well by betting on him. It's 4 fights he's been dog and he hasn't lost 1 of them, and he's won every fight he was favoured for. I mean, I'm not saying he's GOAT or anything, but if anything that's more so an under estimated fighter than an overrated one
That's fine. Who says he's over rated? Jury is still out in my opinion. Although some on here are certainly overrating Fury. Certainly he is the best of the current crop as of this post.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by margaret thatcher »

lol dudes going on about people being caught up in some Fury fevor, having him totally out of place by discussing him with greats, etc....I don't agree and he's been underrated for years if anything---all the way to 2020 baby

Like I said, I still expect lots of dudes to talk themselves into him losing the 3rd fight by the time it comes. He beat Wlad in a staring contest! wILDer won't stare at him :yay:
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by oogiebe »

margaret thatcher wrote: 25 Jun 2020, 19:30 lol dudes going on about people being caught up in some Fury fevor, having him totally out of place by discussing him with greats, etc....I don't agree and he's been underrated for years if anything---all the way to 2020 baby

Like I said, I still expect lots of dudes to talk themselves into him losing the 3rd fight by the time it comes
I see both sides represented here pretty equally. It ain't one sided. Duke is in love with TGK and Alp won't have him beating Braddock.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by margaret thatcher »

cool, you only seem to comment on one of them though :lol:
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by oogiebe »

margaret thatcher wrote: 25 Jun 2020, 19:36 cool, you only seem to comment on one of them though :lol:
I respond to posts. I made my opinion when we were still on the thread topic as well. Saying that Fury's place on the all time list is better served when his career is over seems pretty fair.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by oogiebe »

NOTE: Didn't remember Fury being an underdog vs Chis in the first fight. Looked it up. Margie was right, although just barely. 1.05/1.00 betting underdog.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by margaret thatcher »

I tell the whole truth, and nothing but sir :salut:

Fury gave Chis an inside beating that fight, looked on verge of stopping him late
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by oogiebe »

margaret thatcher wrote: 25 Jun 2020, 19:43 I tell the whole truth, and nothing but sir :salut:

Fury gave Chis an inside beating that fight, looked on verge of stopping him late
So do you think Fury beats Ali?
Duran1970
Lightweight
Posts: 934
Joined: 03 Jan 2018, 14:20

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by Duran1970 »

Also the Wilder rematch was even come fight time..hardly odds where you would've won well.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by margaret thatcher »

Nah, but it's not some untouchable shutout schooling either, like I said people always go too extreme for hypos. I think Fury would be successful across all eras, and yes, that includes beating slick, slippery Cleveland Williams :yay:
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by margaret thatcher »

Duran1970 wrote: 25 Jun 2020, 19:46 Also the Wilder rematch was even come fight time..hardly odds where you would've won well.
Nah,, Wilder was the favourite, there was lots of time to get on Fury as underdog and make good profit. Guys reaching, just stawp, Fury was underdog 4 times, including both Wilder fights. dudes, including us my boi dury, underestimated him and picked against him. Wilder's winning a decision? Lol he couldnt win a round vs tGK

A guy being dog at all is great odds when he proves to be so much better
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by oogiebe »

margaret thatcher wrote: 25 Jun 2020, 19:47 Nah, but it's not some untouchable shutout schooling either, like I said people always go too extreme for hypos. I think Fury would be successful across all eras, and yes, that includes beating slick, slippery Cleveland Williams :yay:
I take those comments as folks stressing a point and not to be taken literally.
Duran1970
Lightweight
Posts: 934
Joined: 03 Jan 2018, 14:20

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by Duran1970 »

Bowman's had the fight even..
And 1.05 to 1 vs Chisora?
What a shocking upset.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by oogiebe »

Duran1970 wrote: 25 Jun 2020, 20:02 Bowman's had the fight even..
And 1.05 to 1 vs Chisora?
What a shocking upset.
:lol: Don't take him too seriously.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by margaret thatcher »

Fury was dog at all the major books, the odds were all out there and you can still find them. There was tons of time to get Fury as dog all the way to fight day

Yep, so that makes Fury the underdog vs Chisora, just like I said :TU: of course he beat the poo out of him and proved to be way better than a guy favoured to beat him :yay:

People like me and you underestimated Fury, my boi D. You can't lose a decision if you win every round!
Duran1970
Lightweight
Posts: 934
Joined: 03 Jan 2018, 14:20

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by Duran1970 »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 25 Jun 2020, 17:37 He has had two real fights. One win and one draw. He looked like crap against an ancient Klitschko. doesn't make him a legend.
X2
Duran1970
Lightweight
Posts: 934
Joined: 03 Jan 2018, 14:20

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by Duran1970 »

oogiebe wrote: 25 Jun 2020, 20:04
Duran1970 wrote: 25 Jun 2020, 20:02 Bowman's had the fight even..
And 1.05 to 1 vs Chisora?
What a shocking upset.
:lol: Don't take him too seriously.
What's untrue with that post oogs
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by oogiebe »

Duran1970 wrote: 25 Jun 2020, 20:27
oogiebe wrote: 25 Jun 2020, 20:04
:lol: Don't take him too seriously.
What's untrue with that post oogs
I was referring to Mags. He likes to 'stir things up.' And he has that annoying nervous laugh (lol).
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by margaret thatcher »

Ya, saying someone was an underdog when they were an underdog is really controversial :lol:
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5710
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

Fury has a great skillset. When doing these mythical fights i assume the guy at his best. So fury from wilder2 not fury vs wallin

Hes a handful for anyone. Not unbeatable but top notch for aure
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by oogiebe »

Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 25 Jun 2020, 22:01 Fury has a great skillset. When doing these mythical fights i assume the guy at his best. So fury from wilder2 not fury vs wallin

Hes a handful for anyone. Not unbeatable but top notch for aure
Does that style Fury used on Wilder in the rematch work effectively on a better skilled heavyweight?
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by margaret thatcher »

TGK is a versatile dude :box:
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5710
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

oogiebe wrote: 25 Jun 2020, 22:17
Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 25 Jun 2020, 22:01 Fury has a great skillset. When doing these mythical fights i assume the guy at his best. So fury from wilder2 not fury vs wallin

Hes a handful for anyone. Not unbeatable but top notch for aure
Does that style Fury used on Wilder in the rematch work effectively on a better skilled heavyweight?
He can fight many styles. Meant it more that he was fighting at a peak that night.

Id pick peak ali to beat him if my life were depending on it
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Muhammad Ali (1967) vs. current HWs ?

Post by Brute »

Liston was surprised at how tall Clay (as he was known then) was when they faced up in the ring. Sonny had an apelike reach but Cassius used his height better than Sonny used his reach. As for Ali in the 1970s? Foreman fought like Liston and was taller but could not match Ali.
Post Reply