That savage beating he delivered to Kalajdzic is also respectable. Kalajdzic was practicaly unbeaten for everybody who saw Browne fight. You can also rate Koelling and Callum Johnson somewhere on Tony Harrison and Erickson Lubin level which are Charlo best wins. On the other side, Charlo is younger and he just take another belts to the colection from decent oponent. Meantime, Beterbiev 35 years old, probably finish his prime years with idiotic fights with Adam Deines and Meng Fanlong LOL.world ranked wrote: ↑28 Sep 2020, 16:44Why do you consider Beterbiev higher? Is there anything other than the Gzyvodzk win?Cent0089 wrote: ↑28 Sep 2020, 16:26I dont think he lost to Harrison. But IMO he lost to Martyrosian. And IMO Beterbiev is higher on P4P list than Charlo, despite he has some really impressive winsworld ranked wrote: ↑28 Sep 2020, 16:21
That's all I'm saying that it is a debatable point. I'm Alcine( though faded, Vanes) are couple of more quality wins. Do you believe Harrison beat Charlo the first fight. Yes I know you might say it was close. Simply who you thought won that first fight?
Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
I concede Kalajdzic but Callum Johnson is on Harrison level based on what?Cent0089 wrote: ↑28 Sep 2020, 17:08That savage beating he delivered to Kalajdzic is also respectable. Kalajdzic was practicaly unbeaten for everybody who saw Browne fight. You can also rate Koelling and Callum Johnson somewhere on Tony Harrison and Erickson Lubin level which are Charlo best wins. On the other side, Charlo is younger and he just take another belts to the colection from decent oponent. Meantime, Beterbiev 35 years old, probably finish his prime years with idiotic fights with Adam Deines and Meng Fanlong LOL.world ranked wrote: ↑28 Sep 2020, 16:44Why do you consider Beterbiev higher? Is there anything other than the Gzyvodzk win?
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
My opinionworld ranked wrote: ↑28 Sep 2020, 20:24I concede Kalajdzic but Callum Johnson is on Harrison level based on what?Cent0089 wrote: ↑28 Sep 2020, 17:08That savage beating he delivered to Kalajdzic is also respectable. Kalajdzic was practicaly unbeaten for everybody who saw Browne fight. You can also rate Koelling and Callum Johnson somewhere on Tony Harrison and Erickson Lubin level which are Charlo best wins. On the other side, Charlo is younger and he just take another belts to the colection from decent oponent. Meantime, Beterbiev 35 years old, probably finish his prime years with idiotic fights with Adam Deines and Meng Fanlong LOL.world ranked wrote: ↑28 Sep 2020, 16:44
Why do you consider Beterbiev higher? Is there anything other than the Gzyvodzk win?
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39234
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
your opinion is not acceptable!! jermell rates higher ![[icon_e_surprised.gif] :oo](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39234
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
Oh not on actually what he did in the ring while Harrison became a world champ. Callum Johnson beat nobody got it. At least have some type of tangible thought to back up your opinion. A fact is Harrison was a world champ and Callum Johnson was not and beat nobody that higher than Brittish level.Cent0089 wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 01:50My opinionworld ranked wrote: ↑28 Sep 2020, 20:24I concede Kalajdzic but Callum Johnson is on Harrison level based on what?Cent0089 wrote: ↑28 Sep 2020, 17:08
That savage beating he delivered to Kalajdzic is also respectable. Kalajdzic was practicaly unbeaten for everybody who saw Browne fight. You can also rate Koelling and Callum Johnson somewhere on Tony Harrison and Erickson Lubin level which are Charlo best wins. On the other side, Charlo is younger and he just take another belts to the colection from decent oponent. Meantime, Beterbiev 35 years old, probably finish his prime years with idiotic fights with Adam Deines and Meng Fanlong LOL.![]()
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
Well Harrison have a bit better resume than Johnson, but Johnson was undefeated, while harrison had 2 stoppage losses prior Charlo fight.world ranked wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 08:13Oh not on actually what he did in the ring while Harrison became a world champ. Callum Johnson beat nobody got it. At least have some type of tangible thought to back up your opinion. A fact is Harrison was a world champ and Callum Johnson was not and beat nobody that higher than Brittish level.Cent0089 wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 01:50My opinionworld ranked wrote: ↑28 Sep 2020, 20:24
I concede Kalajdzic but Callum Johnson is on Harrison level based on what?![]()
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
I wouldn't have him in the P4P Top 10, but yeah there ain't really a lot of fights left for him at 154 of note.
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
Who he lost to matters and he you beat matter. Just because you undefeated means nothing he you didn't beat anyone. I never knew a world champ with two knockout loses and good wins is worse than an fighter who hasn't done anything.Cent0089 wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 11:44Well Harrison have a bit better resume than Johnson, but Johnson was undefeated, while harrison had 2 stoppage losses prior Charlo fight.world ranked wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 08:13Oh not on actually what he did in the ring while Harrison became a world champ. Callum Johnson beat nobody got it. At least have some type of tangible thought to back up your opinion. A fact is Harrison was a world champ and Callum Johnson was not and beat nobody that higher than Brittish level.
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
I did not say Harrison is worse than Johnson. Ive said they are on the same level. Anyway, all i wrote is my opinion, please respect that just as i respect yoursworld ranked wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 12:10Who he lost to matters and he you beat matter. Just because you undefeated means nothing he you didn't beat anyone. I never knew a world champ with two knockout loses and good wins is worse than an fighter who hasn't done anything.Cent0089 wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 11:44Well Harrison have a bit better resume than Johnson, but Johnson was undefeated, while harrison had 2 stoppage losses prior Charlo fight.world ranked wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 08:13
Oh not on actually what he did in the ring while Harrison became a world champ. Callum Johnson beat nobody got it. At least have some type of tangible thought to back up your opinion. A fact is Harrison was a world champ and Callum Johnson was not and beat nobody that higher than Brittish level.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39234
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
lol sure, you think it's very debatable world my man 
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
I respect your opinion. I'm just trying to get the logic in the opinion. But doesn't seem to be any logic in it that's all.Cent0089 wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 13:02I did not say Harrison is worse than Johnson. Ive said they are on the same level. Anyway, all i wrote is my opinion, please respect that just as i respect yoursworld ranked wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 12:10Who he lost to matters and he you beat matter. Just because you undefeated means nothing he you didn't beat anyone. I never knew a world champ with two knockout loses and good wins is worse than an fighter who hasn't done anything.![]()
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
Do you think Callum Johnson is same level as Harrison and if so why?
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39234
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
i dunno, never really thought about it
do you think charlo is for sure p4p above bert, or is it debatable like you said earlier? cause you seem really fired up about proving otherwise
do you think charlo is for sure p4p above bert, or is it debatable like you said earlier? cause you seem really fired up about proving otherwise
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
Who's Bert?margaret thatcher wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 13:52 i dunno, never really thought about it
do you think charlo is for sure p4p above bert, or is it debatable like you said earlier? cause you seem really fired up about proving otherwise![]()
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
Depth of resume has to account for something but now I seem more disappointed that people think a guy former champ who has a better resume is the same as guy who done nothing above domestic level the same. I understand people have opinions I just hoping some would come with some reason behind it other than just saying its my opinion.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 13:52 i dunno, never really thought about it
do you think charlo is for sure p4p above bert, or is it debatable like you said earlier? cause you seem really fired up about proving otherwise![]()
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
For the record Harrison never deserved his title in the first place. That's why he didn't keep it. That's why he COULDN'T keep it.world ranked wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 13:56Depth of resume has to account for something but now I seem more disappointed that people think a guy former champ who has a better resume is the same as guy who done nothing above domestic level the same. I understand people have opinions I just hoping some would come with some reason behind it other than just saying its my opinion.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 13:52 i dunno, never really thought about it
do you think charlo is for sure p4p above bert, or is it debatable like you said earlier? cause you seem really fired up about proving otherwise![]()
That being said he's probably better than Callum Johnson. Off hand I can't even put a face to the name with him so he certainly didn't make any impression on me.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39234
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
bert is berterbiev....what is his argument over charlo? is it a rational argument?
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
I mean I don't have either one of 'em P4P Top 10. I'd probably have Jermell slightly ahead of Beterbiev though, but they're close.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 14:00 bert is berterbiev....what is his argument over charlo? is it a rational argument?
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
Because Harrison also did not beat anybody better that this "british level" . Other than close first fight with Charlo (which he lost IMO) his best wins are Ishe Smith and Tyrone Brunson. They are equivalents for Frank Buglioni and Sean Monaghan.world ranked wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 13:50Do you think Callum Johnson is same level as Harrison and if so why?
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
You can't say other than Charlo and there's no other than for Johnson and secondly wasn't Ishe Smith a world champ? Harrison beat two champs how many Johnson beat?Cent0089 wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 14:20Because Harrison also did not beat anybody better that this "british level" . Other than close first fight with Charlo (which he lost IMO) his best wins are Ishe Smith and Tyrone Brunson. They are equivalents for Frank Buglioni and Sean Monaghan.world ranked wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 13:50Do you think Callum Johnson is same level as Harrison and if so why?
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
Nah. I'd put Ishe Smith over either one of those guys, and that's saying something because I can't stand Ishe Smith and for quite a while considered him one of my most hated boxers.Cent0089 wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 14:20Because Harrison also did not beat anybody better that this "british level" . Other than close first fight with Charlo (which he lost IMO) his best wins are Ishe Smith and Tyrone Brunson. They are equivalents for Frank Buglioni and Sean Monaghan.world ranked wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 13:50Do you think Callum Johnson is same level as Harrison and if so why?
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
Thank you someone who has knowledge of levels of wins.gilgamesh wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 14:24Nah. I'd put Ishe Smith over either one of those guys, and that's saying something because I can't stand Ishe Smith and for quite a while considered him one of my most hated boxers.Cent0089 wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 14:20Because Harrison also did not beat anybody better that this "british level" . Other than close first fight with Charlo (which he lost IMO) his best wins are Ishe Smith and Tyrone Brunson. They are equivalents for Frank Buglioni and Sean Monaghan.world ranked wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020, 13:50
Do you think Callum Johnson is same level as Harrison and if so why?
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39234
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Thoughts about Jermell Charlo?
so what exactly is berterbiev's argument that you think makes this debatable, world my man?