"Reach advantage"

Post Reply
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3172
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

"Reach advantage"

Post by deadpan »

Why do broadcasters quote a 'two inch reach advantage' as though it means that the fighter's arms are 2 inches longer than their opponent. It's one inch each arm. It infuriates me.

They should scrap reach stats and use arm length instead.

That's all. Enjoy your day.
byobdylan
Featherweight
Posts: 9
Joined: 05 Aug 2020, 13:36

Re: "Reach advantage"

Post by byobdylan »

Are they even measured or just estimates?

I heard Carl Frampton say in his podcast that no one has ever measured his reach, for example.
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 6020
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: "Reach advantage"

Post by joshj909 »

Doesn't the measurement also measure across the chest? Some boxers have much wider chests than others so that 2 inches isn't even necessarily split between the two arms.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9218
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: "Reach advantage"

Post by Controversial »

Most tale of the tapes are guesstimates anyway
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: "Reach advantage"

Post by Boxing Prospect »

byobdylan wrote: 30 Nov 2020, 10:18 Are they even measured or just estimates?

I heard Carl Frampton say in his podcast that no one has ever measured his reach, for example.
Can only talk about Japan, but measurements are taken over there as part of the medical before a world title fight
goose 5
Super Featherweight
Posts: 6198
Joined: 12 Sep 2018, 20:20

Re: "Reach advantage"

Post by goose 5 »

Yes and in japan the heights are measured with shoes on.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39337
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: "Reach advantage"

Post by margaret thatcher »

deadpan wrote: 30 Nov 2020, 09:06 Why do broadcasters quote a 'two inch reach advantage' as though it means that the fighter's arms are 2 inches longer than their opponent. It's one inch each arm. It infuriates me.

They should scrap reach stats and use arm length instead.

That's all. Enjoy your day.
chest width contributes to how far you can hit someone from, so it should be accounted for, having broader shoulders/chest basically means your arm starts from further out

the dudes below have equal arm length but bottom dude with broader shoulders can hit you from further away


.....0---__---0

0---_____---0
Delta Jay
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1915
Joined: 26 Jun 2013, 15:19

Re: "Reach advantage"

Post by Delta Jay »

margaret thatcher wrote: 30 Nov 2020, 20:32
deadpan wrote: 30 Nov 2020, 09:06 Why do broadcasters quote a 'two inch reach advantage' as though it means that the fighter's arms are 2 inches longer than their opponent. It's one inch each arm. It infuriates me.

They should scrap reach stats and use arm length instead.

That's all. Enjoy your day.
chest width contributes to how far you can hit someone from, so it should be accounted for, having broader shoulders/chest basically means your arm starts from further out

the dudes below have equal arm length but bottom dude with broader shoulders can hit you from further away


.....0---__---0

0---_____---0
Was about to say this, but I could never have managed that diagram.

Wider shoulders means you can punch further. Simple really
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9218
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: "Reach advantage"

Post by Controversial »

A lot of stats are exaggerated, fighters like to give the impressions they are bigger than they are. It would be interesting to see fighters properly measured though.
Post Reply