Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Who wins?

Poll ended at 19 Dec 2020, 06:37

Alvarez - Decision
17
22%
Alvarez - T/KO
44
56%
DRAW
4
5%
Smith - T/KO
7
9%
Smith - Decision
7
9%
 
Total votes: 79

Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by Fray Bentos »

Jimmy2020 wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 01:46 The Brits giving Smith an ego massage now but everyone else around the world will see him as yet another Eurobum.
He didn't do much but he couldn't have done much more without getting flattened. He hadn't any answers from the opening bell.
Grilling Machine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3152
Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by Grilling Machine »

Calzaghe's surely wishing he was 15 years younger right now!
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by Fray Bentos »

TheGman wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 01:47 Imagine calzaghe fightin Canelo? Canelo wouldnt of seen round 12 imo,Calzaghe would of pummelled him with his work rate.
Calazghe - I bet he watches that and thinks about a comeback! :salut:
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by DrDuke »

Grilling Machine wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 01:49 Calzaghe's surely wishing he was 15 years younger right now!
Or maybe he shouldn't.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100802
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Grilling Machine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3152
Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by Grilling Machine »

DrDuke wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 01:50Or maybe he shouldn't.
I think a lot of us'd pay Joe to *not* come back, but he never had a superstar opportunity like beating Canelo is right now.

And what a fight Froch would've given him.
ironbeard
Super Featherweight
Posts: 17189
Joined: 15 Sep 2018, 20:00

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by ironbeard »

Fray Bentos wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 01:38 It's all about levels, you can't box on the backfoot against Alvarez with slow footwork because all he did was close him down and throw basic shots and win every round. I don't think Callum could have gone out on his 'shield' without getting KO'd within 30 seconds but he showed grit, heart - I think Canelo broke his nose in the ninth round with that uppercut so - he stuck it out to lose on points.

What's worse is how much boxing has regressed - could you imagine 1985 Thomas Hearns having trouble with either of these for a few rounds? Chavez and how he closed his opponents off with bodyshots and combinations - he was mesmerising to watch - the way HE totally broke down Edwin Rosario - who was a class boxer himself - and he just dismantled him. If we're going to knock Smith, then we should knock Canelo because compared to the no.1's of the past, he doesn't set the world alight either.

Yeah, he's the best around now but so what! Meh! :doh:
I am far from a Canelo groupie, but he rates in any boxing era. Historically great resume, chin, defense, longevity, adaptability, and class.

Canelo just dismantled a prime monster at 168; completely outclassed him; busted him up; out jabbed him.

Terrific performance.
Nondescript
Super Featherweight
Posts: 3489
Joined: 07 Sep 2018, 07:50

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by Nondescript »

TheGman wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 01:30 Smith too 1 dimensional,BJS would give canelo a better fight than that.
Saunders would get stopped. He wouldn't survive the body shots.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11788
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by Old bones Ian »

Jaime Munguia has to be the big fight for Canelo next year
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11788
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by Old bones Ian »

Canelo is now getting that same aura Chavez had in his prime.
The opponents end up fighting scared and it gives Canelo 3-4 rounds before the bell has even rung.

The difference is Chavez would get the opponent out of there inside the distance
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1475
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

Smith has regressed due to inactivity imo. It started in the Ryder fight, continues here. He's spent too much time sitting on the sidelines waiting for the stadium fight. Poor management for me.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by DrDuke »

Black Sam Bellamy wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 03:09 Smith has regressed due to inactivity imo. It started in the Ryder fight, continues here. He's spent too much time sitting on the sidelines waiting for the stadium fight. Poor management for me.
He wasn't that inactive before Ryder. He had a regular schedule of the nowadays' champion.

Anyway, the Ryder bout kinda exposed him indeed. Without it Smith would have looked as a more challenging matchup for Canelo.

And after a such effortless performance Smith now will be considered as sh!t by many.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11788
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by Old bones Ian »

Anyone know the sparring partners for Smith?
He seemed to lack ideas on what to do, I mean its different when you have someone as good as Canelo facing you
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by DrDuke »

Old bones Ian wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 03:31 He seemed to lack ideas on what to do, I mean its different when you have someone as good as Canelo facing you
His major idea was to counter-punch against a counter-puncher. Genious! And he barely attempted to use his range.
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by Fray Bentos »

ironbeard wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 02:17
Fray Bentos wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 01:38 It's all about levels, you can't box on the backfoot against Alvarez with slow footwork because all he did was close him down and throw basic shots and win every round. I don't think Callum could have gone out on his 'shield' without getting KO'd within 30 seconds but he showed grit, heart - I think Canelo broke his nose in the ninth round with that uppercut so - he stuck it out to lose on points.

What's worse is how much boxing has regressed - could you imagine 1985 Thomas Hearns having trouble with either of these for a few rounds? Chavez and how he closed his opponents off with bodyshots and combinations - he was mesmerising to watch - the way HE totally broke down Edwin Rosario - who was a class boxer himself - and he just dismantled him. If we're going to knock Smith, then we should knock Canelo because compared to the no.1's of the past, he doesn't set the world alight either.

Yeah, he's the best around now but so what! Meh! :doh:
I am far from a Canelo groupie, but he rates in any boxing era. Historically great resume, chin, defense, longevity, adaptability, and class.

Canelo just dismantled a prime monster at 168; completely outclassed him; busted him up; out jabbed him.

Terrific performance.
You're entitled to that opinion and many might agree but I can't agree with it...

Do you think Hagler, Hearns, SRL, Napoles, Monzon, JCC, Emile Griffith, Duran etc wouldn't school Canelo badly based on his performance today?

I am not saying he is a bad fighter, he isn't bad but the dearth of talent today is woeful - Wilfred Benitez would have won every bloody round! Thomas Hearns would have had him out of there within a few rounds...
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3335
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by Twinkle Toes »

Smith has never shown the form that would be needed to beat Alvarez, and the size difference was never a factor in Smith's favour.

You don't go from a life and death struggle with Ryder to beating the like of Alvarez. I had my doubts about Smith before the fight and this all but confirmed them.

It's about levels - We've seen this enough times over the past few weeks.
BroughtonRulesRefuge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2764
Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 06:55

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by BroughtonRulesRefuge »

Fray Bentos wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 03:42
ironbeard wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 02:17
Fray Bentos wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 01:38 It's all about levels, you can't box on the backfoot against Alvarez with slow footwork because all he did was close him down and throw basic shots and win every round. I don't think Callum could have gone out on his 'shield' without getting KO'd within 30 seconds but he showed grit, heart - I think Canelo broke his nose in the ninth round with that uppercut so - he stuck it out to lose on points.

What's worse is how much boxing has regressed - could you imagine 1985 Thomas Hearns having trouble with either of these for a few rounds? Chavez and how he closed his opponents off with bodyshots and combinations - he was mesmerising to watch - the way HE totally broke down Edwin Rosario - who was a class boxer himself - and he just dismantled him. If we're going to knock Smith, then we should knock Canelo because compared to the no.1's of the past, he doesn't set the world alight either.

Yeah, he's the best around now but so what! Meh! :doh:
I am far from a Canelo groupie, but he rates in any boxing era. Historically great resume, chin, defense, longevity, adaptability, and class.

Canelo just dismantled a prime monster at 168; completely outclassed him; busted him up; out jabbed him.

Terrific performance.
You're entitled to that opinion and many might agree but I can't agree with it...

Do you think Hagler, Hearns, SRL, Napoles, Monzon, JCC, Emile Griffith, Duran etc wouldn't school Canelo badly based on his performance today?

I am not saying he is a bad fighter, he isn't bad but the dearth of talent today is woeful - Wilfred Benitez would have won every bloody round! Thomas Hearns would have had him out of there within a few rounds...


- You're entitled to your blubber even as others would abhor it and your slow twitch reaction times.

Wilfredo was the King of split decisions because he seldom trained and so on. I'm not saying your guys are bad fighters, ie Marv and Duran my favs, but Duran tapped out of greatness @welter and Marv strictly a middlewt and so on.

Like most, you think your heroes end all arguements, a rather pedestrian intellectual limitation. Callum first ever Ali Trophy winner and a Ring Champ and unbeaten to boot though doubtless you thought Ryder beat him. Not hardly, and Callum put up a magnificent effort in spite of being outgunned, outgeneraled and carrying a horrendous injury to his left fighting implement that further reduced him caused by the greatest fighter of his generation.

Frankly, you didn't deserve to watch such a great fight given your intellectual limitations, but you did and now carry that shame for the remainder of your years...unless...unless you can mount a credible comeback to the actual reality of that moment in time.

Git thee and thy blubber in synchronization pronto lest your window of opportunity is shattered forever.
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by Fray Bentos »

BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 04:27
Fray Bentos wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 03:42
ironbeard wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 02:17
I am far from a Canelo groupie, but he rates in any boxing era. Historically great resume, chin, defense, longevity, adaptability, and class.

Canelo just dismantled a prime monster at 168; completely outclassed him; busted him up; out jabbed him.

Terrific performance.
You're entitled to that opinion and many might agree but I can't agree with it...

Do you think Hagler, Hearns, SRL, Napoles, Monzon, JCC, Emile Griffith, Duran etc wouldn't school Canelo badly based on his performance today?

I am not saying he is a bad fighter, he isn't bad but the dearth of talent today is woeful - Wilfred Benitez would have won every bloody round! Thomas Hearns would have had him out of there within a few rounds...


- You're entitled to your blubber even as others would abhor it and your slow twitch reaction times.

Wilfredo was the King of split decisions because he seldom trained and so on. I'm not saying your guys are bad fighters, ie Marv and Duran my favs, but Duran tapped out of greatness @welter and Marv strictly a middlewt and so on.

Like most, you think your heroes end all arguements, a rather pedestrian intellectual limitation. Callum first ever Ali Trophy winner and a Ring Champ and unbeaten to boot though doubtless you thought Ryder beat him. Not hardly, and Callum put up a magnificent effort in spite of being outgunned, outgeneraled and carrying a horrendous injury to his left fighting implement that further reduced him caused by the greatest fighter of his generation.

Frankly, you didn't deserve to watch such a great fight given your intellectual limitations, but you did and now carry that shame for the remainder of your years...unless...unless you can mount a credible comeback to the actual reality of that moment in time.

Git thee and thy blubber in synchronization pronto lest your window of opportunity is shattered forever.
fornicate off you prick - hows that for my 'intellectual limitations' :lol:

Smith did try his best, I am hoping he is not criticised for his attempt - he was a level or two below Canelo and didn't have the footwork required to get out of the way of the shorter man who just went in, threw mostly single shots and stepped on his toes - if Smith wanted to be a hero and 'go out on his shield' he would have got knocked out - Canelo was happy and content not to get out of first gear. Fine - if that's what you like.

Duran tapped out (strange terminology... don't tell me, you have the t-shirt) when he was an old man and against someone who was the absolute opposite of Alvarez - no way Duran would have had any problems with Alvarez and Benitez would have schooled him - of course, the Benitez who starched Maurice Hope! Not the one past his prime - a prime any of those i mentioned wouldn't have had a problem with Canelo.

Do you think Canelo goes five rounds with a 1985 Thomas Hearns - get real! :roll:
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by danconnollyeire »

There’s a few ways to beat Canelo. Throw a billion punches and move (I.e. be calzaghe), have a chin made of granite and throw 2 for every one you take (GGG), or be Mayweather. Smith had next to no ideas
Omerta
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 261
Joined: 21 Aug 2011, 08:11

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by Omerta »

NoScoutingReports wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 01:23
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 01:19 Smith has always been the best Smith.. but now I’m thinking.. has he?? Is he??

Liam put up a better fight.
Liam is a fcuking game fighter mate, always coming forward with decent output and digs in even when outclassed. Him and Munguia was a fun watch.
Liam Smith is as tough as they come the guy has the heart of a lion
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22943
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by mickey1975 »

Canelo getting underrated on here.
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4509
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by JC »

mickey1975 wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 05:02 Canelo getting underrated on here.
Absolutely. Just watched the fight, came on here, and surprised by what I'm reading.
Jimmy2020
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 1506
Joined: 19 Oct 2020, 15:07

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by Jimmy2020 »

mickey1975 wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 05:02 Canelo getting underrated on here.
You think? Maybe. I think he's absolutely awesome. Easily p4p best.
smiling assassin
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3196
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by smiling assassin »

mickey1975 wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 05:02 Canelo getting underrated on here.
He’s not being underrated the man is a great fighter, Let’s keep things in perspective though. He got played with by Mayweather, he arguably lost both fights against Golovkin (no question he lost the first) and a lot of people thought he was lucky to get the decision against Lara.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22943
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez vs. Callum Smith - 19 December 2020

Post by mickey1975 »

Jimmy2020 wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 05:11
mickey1975 wrote: 20 Dec 2020, 05:02 Canelo getting underrated on here.
You think? Maybe. I think he's absolutely awesome. Easily p4p best.
By some. I think his defence is brilliant, very imposing physically, great boxing brain, brilliant chin. He’s got the lot.
Post Reply