Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39336
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
like taylor and groves shots? kessler also sagged him and dirrell had him backpeddling
froch was not quite totally iron, he had a good chin but his recovery was as much or better than his ability not to get hurt in the first place
there is an upper elite of chins, like mccall, chuvalo, ggg, canelo etc where the guys arent even getting dropped or much rattled at all---those are the elite chin beasts. something like mariusz wach taking 12 rounds of flush klit shots without as much as wobbling
froch was not quite totally iron, he had a good chin but his recovery was as much or better than his ability not to get hurt in the first place
there is an upper elite of chins, like mccall, chuvalo, ggg, canelo etc where the guys arent even getting dropped or much rattled at all---those are the elite chin beasts. something like mariusz wach taking 12 rounds of flush klit shots without as much as wobbling
-
coghaugen11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2595
- Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
Eubank was only dropped on balance really, a chin doesn’t determine staying upright - core strength/balance does. Or in the Calzaghe KD case of Eubank - caught cold and not seeing punch coming.
Collins was the strongest of all - he walked THROUGH punches.
Collins was the strongest of all - he walked THROUGH punches.
-
coghaugen11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2595
- Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
Greg George shoved him, Benn KD was a slip on water in the corner, Collins square-on push
The Tim Brown ‘KD’ on his debut was also a slip and not counted by ref, and the Armstrong Wilkerson ‘KD’ in Feb84 was also a shove/slip
The Tim Brown ‘KD’ on his debut was also a slip and not counted by ref, and the Armstrong Wilkerson ‘KD’ in Feb84 was also a shove/slip
Last edited by coghaugen11 on 23 Feb 2021, 13:03, edited 2 times in total.
-
coghaugen11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2595
- Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
Watson KD was a rabbit punch to one knee while concussed and exhausted. His head was always cleared almost instantly
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
Exactly thismargaret thatcher wrote: ↑23 Feb 2021, 12:10 like taylor and groves shots? kessler also sagged him and dirrell had him backpeddling
froch was not quite totally iron, he had a good chin but his recovery was as much or better than his ability not to get hurt in the first place
there is an upper elite of chins, like mccall, chuvalo, ggg, canelo etc where the guys arent even getting dropped or much rattled at all---those are the elite chin beasts. something like mariusz wach taking 12 rounds of flush klit shots without as much as wobbling
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
Like Taylor and Groves, who both got stopped.
The only guy who ever looked like an inside the distance defeat might be on the cards against Froch was Andre Ward, but it didn't happen.
You would never, ever see Froch willingly look for the canvas like Eubank did against Watson.
The only guy who ever looked like an inside the distance defeat might be on the cards against Froch was Andre Ward, but it didn't happen.
You would never, ever see Froch willingly look for the canvas like Eubank did against Watson.
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39336
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
yep, the guys who put him hard on his ass got stopped
as for a stoppage never looking on the cards.......Froch was really poggered by the groves shot and took a shellacking for a few rounds after, looking far more weary and gunshy than id ever seen him and getting stung a few more times. it wasnt like he just got dropped and then came back roaring straight off. i think it was only around the 5th when you could see him really getting some oomph and confidence to his work
at the time, in the first few rounds, i defo thought a stoppage wasnt unrealistic and it was all a bit shocking to watch.
as for a stoppage never looking on the cards.......Froch was really poggered by the groves shot and took a shellacking for a few rounds after, looking far more weary and gunshy than id ever seen him and getting stung a few more times. it wasnt like he just got dropped and then came back roaring straight off. i think it was only around the 5th when you could see him really getting some oomph and confidence to his work
at the time, in the first few rounds, i defo thought a stoppage wasnt unrealistic and it was all a bit shocking to watch.
Last edited by margaret thatcher on 23 Feb 2021, 19:18, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
You're making a case for Froch in saying that.
When did he ever slither to the canvas for a mercy count ?
When did he ever slither to the canvas for a mercy count ?
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39336
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
not really , dude was seriously hurt and feeling it for a good few rounds after, should be pretty obvious to anyone watching. i defo think watching it at the time he looked in bad enough shape for a stoppage to be considered a real possibility. a stoppage never on the cards fight is more like one where a dude goes down but isnt hurt or recovers straight away
no doubt froch recovered well and had really good heart and stamina that came into it as well. i do think he got hurt in the first place a bit easier than often depicted though
no doubt froch recovered well and had really good heart and stamina that came into it as well. i do think he got hurt in the first place a bit easier than often depicted though
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
The 6th round of the first Groves fight is proof beyond doubt that Froch can hold a punch with the best of them, and better than Eubank. Eye popping viewing
![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39336
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
nah, there is a tier of dudes who are so tough that they are pretty much undentable. provo, ggg, canelo, wach, etc among guys that competed at the same time as froch......none of these dudes been down or ever looked in too much trouble. if you arent even really hurt much or even put down, your recovery doesnt even need to come into it much like ffrochs did.
froch wasnt among those guys, he was the next best tier. abraham similar
froch wasnt among those guys, he was the next best tier. abraham similar
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
GGG is something else
Canelo rock solid (but sadly with some questions marks about what he's taking), Wach is as tough as old boots but it's Eubank Snr we're comparing against Froch and the way Froch puts it out there with unashamed confidence eclipses Eubanks.
Eubanks chose not to mix it up with the top Americans and really test those whiskers, but Froch did.
I'll concede Froch didn't offer it up against Abrahams, but come on, Artur was one of the strongest guys about. Other than that Froch was in the danger zone all the time.
Eubanks chose not to mix it up with the top Americans and really test those whiskers, but Froch did.
I'll concede Froch didn't offer it up against Abrahams, but come on, Artur was one of the strongest guys about. Other than that Froch was in the danger zone all the time.
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39336
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
you said his chin holds up with the best of them, that's what i was responding too, i think it's clear it wasnt at that same level where they could take shots with hardly being fazed, more like the next level of very good but not great
true eubank lacked an elite murican, but not sure any of them hit harder at 168 than benn did
true eubank lacked an elite murican, but not sure any of them hit harder at 168 than benn did
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
I think it does hold up with them mentioned. Like Groves said "the thing is with Carl, you can hit him".
Froch can be hit but he was never stopped...and in better company than Eubank. Chris hid his durability away from the international thumps with maybe the exception of Rocchighiani...not a noted a puncher.
Froch can be hit but he was never stopped...and in better company than Eubank. Chris hid his durability away from the international thumps with maybe the exception of Rocchighiani...not a noted a puncher.
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39336
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
those guys dont go down or even get hurt really, different level, all very hard dudes with chin though
benn could hit as hard as any of them btw, being from another place doesnt make you a harder puncher
benn could hit as hard as any of them btw, being from another place doesnt make you a harder puncher
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
GGG and Canelo have much better defensive smarts than Froch. The little slips at the last second, catching the punches to take the sting out of them etc...Froch would tend to just take the punches flush.
Benn was a puncher, no question.
It's the facing top drawer opposition fight after fight that puts that chin to the test. Eubank singularly failed in this regard.
Froch's big befuddled moment came against the Son of God...Eubank's, Dan Schommer![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
Benn was a puncher, no question.
It's the facing top drawer opposition fight after fight that puts that chin to the test. Eubank singularly failed in this regard.
Froch's big befuddled moment came against the Son of God...Eubank's, Dan Schommer
-
coghaugen11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2595
- Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
Froch looked befuddled against Matthew Barney, not to mention Taylor and Dirrell.
-
coghaugen11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2595
- Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
Lindell Holmes certainly hit harder than Barkley or Toney and A LOT harder than Nunn. Huge banger. Rocchigiani wiped out Hamsho early with his power.
Although they struggled to land on Eubank.
Although they struggled to land on Eubank.
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
Eubank Watson 1 was the first fight I ever watched live, when I was being child minded by my Mum's boyfriend's daughter. Back then, as a child, with no knowledge of boxing let alone scoring, I was annoyed when Eubank won.
Didn't watch boxing again until Tyson / Bruno 2.
Froch fought absolutely everybody. He took on the RJJ of his era in Ward (as much as I don't really like Ward, I respect his ring IQ and his general brilliance: despite all his Son of God shit that guy was a brutal nasty fighter through and through) and saw the last round, and fought every world class bloke around until he'd sold out Wembley. He took on the best of the best.
Eubank didn't.
I'll go with Froch.
Didn't watch boxing again until Tyson / Bruno 2.
Froch fought absolutely everybody. He took on the RJJ of his era in Ward (as much as I don't really like Ward, I respect his ring IQ and his general brilliance: despite all his Son of God shit that guy was a brutal nasty fighter through and through) and saw the last round, and fought every world class bloke around until he'd sold out Wembley. He took on the best of the best.
Eubank didn't.
I'll go with Froch.
-
TheLeprechaun
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5167
- Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
Eubank lost to Steve Collins. Not only did he lose but he was intimidated and exposed mentally.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
The thread is about who had the best chin.TheLeprechaun wrote: ↑24 Feb 2021, 03:26 Eubank lost to Steve Collins. Not only did he lose but he was intimidated and exposed mentally.
-
coghaugen11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2595
- Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
The RJJ of his era?
RJJ had absolutely frightening punching ability, didn’t constantly hold, constantly run or constantly headbutt like fornicating Ward. That’s hugely insulting to RJJ. Ward was a tricky smart spoiler, without much of a punch.
Eubank fought tenfold more dangerous punchers than Carl Froch. Thornton and Wharton had many one-shot kayos coming up, Tony with that short right and Henry with that left hook. Logan laid out Hernandez - who stayed on his feet from Julian Jackson’s best - cold with his left hook; Eubank absorbed Logan’s best left hook in the 2nd.
RJJ had absolutely frightening punching ability, didn’t constantly hold, constantly run or constantly headbutt like fornicating Ward. That’s hugely insulting to RJJ. Ward was a tricky smart spoiler, without much of a punch.
Eubank fought tenfold more dangerous punchers than Carl Froch. Thornton and Wharton had many one-shot kayos coming up, Tony with that short right and Henry with that left hook. Logan laid out Hernandez - who stayed on his feet from Julian Jackson’s best - cold with his left hook; Eubank absorbed Logan’s best left hook in the 2nd.
-
coghaugen11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2595
- Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59
Re: Chris Eubank or Carl Froch ?
McCallum on the same card as Logan’s horrible kayo of Hernandez was in just as much trouble as Hernandez was also in the 1st v Julian Jackson (Jackson was then stopped on his feet prematurely it seemed in the 2nd).