whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39336
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
as of now, whose career ranks higher
obvs josh can accomplish more, but just take what he's done so far
obvs josh can accomplish more, but just take what he's done so far
-
high tower 1
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1610
- Joined: 04 Aug 2018, 09:36
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
Easily josh. Postol, Davies, Belarusian and rougarou is a great lineup. Harrison was your typical warren wbo champion. No one win of his stands out for me.
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
Harrison was more of a belt holder with the potential to push on but his life caught up with him.
At no point could he have claimed to have been the best in the world, whereas Taylor could claim that now.
At no point could he have claimed to have been the best in the world, whereas Taylor could claim that now.
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
Taylor has a higher ceiling than Harrison...
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
taylor. no contest.
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39336
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
where is ewey? he called me a troll for disagreeing with him that harrisons career rated higher lol
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
Harrison couldn't carry Taylor's jock strap 
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
Where's Harrison's win that compares to Postol, Baranchyk or Prograis ? 
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39336
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
well, this is what a pro-harrison dude said when i was discussing it with himm
2 time featherweight champion. Including wins over Chacon, Wayne McCulloch, Michael Brodie and Medina (avenged after first defeat to regain title). Amongst others.
Never lost his regained title in the ring but couldn't defend it because of the crisps.
I love Josh Taylor and he's brought new life into Scottish boxing but he hasn't achieved what Harrison did yet. A blind man could see that
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39336
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
personally i think hyping someone as a 2 time champ is a bit funny when the only reason the won a title 2x is because they couldnt beat the guy the first time 
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
It wasn't Bobby Chacon he beat ! McCullough wasn't a force at featherweight and Brodie was utterly spent at world level.
If he'd have gone in with Injin Chi, Erik Morales, Marco Antonio Barrera...that would have helped his cause, but they kept Harrison a million miles away from those types.
Taylor's a world beater.
If he'd have gone in with Injin Chi, Erik Morales, Marco Antonio Barrera...that would have helped his cause, but they kept Harrison a million miles away from those types.
Taylor's a world beater.
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39336
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
Taylor already, even if that seems premature. Harrison just never had a result to match the Prograis win or, probably the Postol win.
Harrison had a great career and fought plenty of world title bouts. But to be frank, the WBO title was still the "minor" one when Harrison was in his prime (in 90% of cases anyway, bar Calzaghe and a few others) and in reality he never even fought the real top names. Taylor has already beaten the top man at 140 and become unified IBF/WBA champ, well inside 20 fights!
Harrison had a great career and fought plenty of world title bouts. But to be frank, the WBO title was still the "minor" one when Harrison was in his prime (in 90% of cases anyway, bar Calzaghe and a few others) and in reality he never even fought the real top names. Taylor has already beaten the top man at 140 and become unified IBF/WBA champ, well inside 20 fights!
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13416
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
Harrison didn’t lose his title because of crisps. He was due to fight Nicky Cook at the Excel but got pulled out because he was about to do an absurd weight cut. It’s one of the fights of the last 20 years that I’m most gutted fell through I thought Cook was gonna do it. Granted in the end Cookie did briefly win a title, I seem to remember him and Alex Arthur almost doing a porn scene after the fight they seemed that in love.
At one point when Harrison was World champ he was in the joint best division in boxing. Featherweight and light welterweight at that time were absurd.
Featherweight had Marquez, Barrera, Pacquiao, In Jin Chi, Morales was I think up at super feather but able to take any of those guys on.
Light welterweight had Hatton, PBF, Pinto, Cotto, Tszyu, Mitchell, Gatti and to be fair Junior Witter was in the spell of his career when he was decent to watch too.
There’s probably a bunch in there I’ve forgotten.
At one point when Harrison was World champ he was in the joint best division in boxing. Featherweight and light welterweight at that time were absurd.
Featherweight had Marquez, Barrera, Pacquiao, In Jin Chi, Morales was I think up at super feather but able to take any of those guys on.
Light welterweight had Hatton, PBF, Pinto, Cotto, Tszyu, Mitchell, Gatti and to be fair Junior Witter was in the spell of his career when he was decent to watch too.
There’s probably a bunch in there I’ve forgotten.
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
Not even close. Josh Taylor my a mile. Harrison was no where near Taylor's level
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
How is this even a debate.
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
on a side note, i would have loved to have seen injin chi vs scott harrison
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39336
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23196
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
.
Last edited by handsofstone on 24 Feb 2021, 04:42, edited 1 time in total.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23196
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
I loved Harrison but Taylor already Scotlands greatest ever boxer, it'll take time for him to be regarded better than Buchanan and Lynch but already he's almost better CV wise and technically he already is
-
SticknMove
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6008
- Joined: 04 Aug 2006, 09:02
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
Jeez didn't know Taylor's career ended at its peak. ![[icon_wink.gif] ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
Harrison is top draw,but josh Taylor easily 
Re: whose career rates higher: josh t vs scott harrison
I loved Harrison, went to a few of his fights. Would love to have seen him in with a Barrera, Morales etc from that era.
I don't think he would have won, but he was game enough to give it a go.
I don't think he would have won, but he was game enough to give it a go.