was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39212
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
ggg (kaz, i know), loma both on way down if anything. kov almost done. govzdyk and lebedev retired, gassiev inactive. baranchyk brutally ktfo. usyk on the later part of his career and lost a lot of enthusiasm after his last fight. bert is already like 36 and fighting cans again. derevyanchankyo already like 36 and losing widely to mall
an east euro prospect serhi bohachuk just got flattened by the first good american gatekeeper he faced, a guy who didnt win a second vs an actually legit fighter, the american jermall charlo.
who do they have coming up now? was it just an east euro temporary fad?
an east euro prospect serhi bohachuk just got flattened by the first good american gatekeeper he faced, a guy who didnt win a second vs an actually legit fighter, the american jermall charlo.
who do they have coming up now? was it just an east euro temporary fad?
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
Man I don’t know if I would call it a fad. They had some really good and exciting fighters. Naturally that attracted Eastern Europe fans. I’m still a fan of loma, GGG, etc.
Just seems things have slowed down on the boxing front in general. I’m sure they still have some talents in their amateur ranks and new names will come about.
Just seems things have slowed down on the boxing front in general. I’m sure they still have some talents in their amateur ranks and new names will come about.
-
gregregegg
- Lightweight
- Posts: 9143
- Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
Its the Uzbek era coming....
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
Eastern euros are just fine, you win some, you lose some, just like everyone else, this is boxing

-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
Uzbekistan, Russia, and Kazakhstan seem to be achieving a lot in the amateur ranks (if we’re considering the 2019 world championship medals table, where these three nations were on the podium 47% of the time).
And it’s reasonable to assume that from 15 of those medallists, many of those fighters will very likely progress to becoming exciting world-rated prospects, since most of them are currently in their early to mid-twenties.
Interestingly though, if you review the BoxRec pound-for-pound ratings list for the po ranks, there’s only two Eastern European fighters in their twenties, which is the polar opposite of the equivalent amateur rankings.
That said, I can think of quick a few Eastern European heavyweight prospects in the pro ranks that I feel are destined to become world-rated fighters.
So I feel that the sport of boxing is thriving in that geographical region.
And it’s reasonable to assume that from 15 of those medallists, many of those fighters will very likely progress to becoming exciting world-rated prospects, since most of them are currently in their early to mid-twenties.
Interestingly though, if you review the BoxRec pound-for-pound ratings list for the po ranks, there’s only two Eastern European fighters in their twenties, which is the polar opposite of the equivalent amateur rankings.
That said, I can think of quick a few Eastern European heavyweight prospects in the pro ranks that I feel are destined to become world-rated fighters.
So I feel that the sport of boxing is thriving in that geographical region.
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
It is not a fad, there have been eastern euro champs/contenders since the fall of the USSR, there are a lot now and there will be for a long time. Also in MMA, the games have just started.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
Agreed.
The ban of the pro-ranks was lifted from Eastern European countries from around 1992, which paved the way for the likes of Yuri Arbachakov, Andrey Shkalikov, Oleg Maskiev, Kostya Tszyu, Vitali Klitschko, Wladimir Klitschko, Andrew Golota, Nikolay Valuev, Louis Kaplan, Benny Bass, Vic Darchinyan, Orzubek Nazarov, Sergey Kobozev, Dimitri Kirillov, Denis Inkin, Akhmed Kotiev, Dmitry Pirog, Roman Karmazin, Artur Grigorian, Sultan Ibragimov, Vasily Jirov etc.
Anyone that feels that Eastern European fighters achieving success in the pro ranks is simply a recent “craze” or a “short-lived fad” has to be considered as being either uneducated and lacking knowledge or have only recently started following the sport of boxing.
We're talking about thirty years!
-
Perkin Warbeck
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 1887
- Joined: 25 Jun 2018, 19:53
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
Some of the best Eurasian boxers are currently being avoided, such as Makhmudov, Hrgovic, Kossobutskiy, Davtaev, and Majidov in the heavyweight division. Others have been poorly managed/promoted.
Don't judge them all by mediocre, no-defense Bohachuck. For example, Madrimov is much better.
Don't judge them all by mediocre, no-defense Bohachuck. For example, Madrimov is much better.
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
I hope we at least get to see Beterbiev in one more big fight. That was such quality work against Gvozdyk.
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
Unfortunately for you it's only just started :)
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39212
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
who do they got coming up nyao ?
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
I'll bite
Eimantis Stanionis, Filip Hrgovic, Israil Madrimov, Pavel Silyagin, Albert Batyrgaziev, Evgeny Tischenko, Aleksei Egorov, Mahammedrasul Majidov, Magomed Kurbanov, Alexander Besputin, Bektemir Melikuziev, Radzhab Butaev, Sadriddin Akhmedov, Zhanibek Alimkhanuly, Hovhannes Bachkov, Arslanbek Makhmudov, Viktor Vykhryst, Khariton Agbra, Shakhobidin Zoirov, Arthur Biyarslanov, Ivan Dychko, Bakhram Murtazaliev, Ivan Golub, Fiodor Czerkaszyn,Artem Oganesyan, Shakhbas Makhmudov, Vladimir Shishkin, Vladyslav Sirenko, Vladimir Mironchikov,Shakhram Giyasov, Yauheni Dauhaliavets, Bekzad Nurdauletov, Zhan Kossobutskiy, Denys Berinchyk, Sergey Lubkovich, Ali Izmailov, etc
and in the amateurs:
Oleksandr Khyzhniak (p4p number 1), Dzmitry Asenau, Gleb Bakshi, Andrey Zamkovoy, Muslim Gadzhimagomedov, Vassily Levit, Yaroslav Khartsyz, Ilya popov, Ilya Shakirov, Dzhambulat Bizhamov, Sharaputdin Ataev, Mykola Butsenko, Mirazizbek Mirzakhalilov, Imam Khataev, Ievgenii Barabanov, Ruslan Kolesnikov, Gabil Mamedov, Sergey Sobylinsky, Alexey Zobnin, Ivan Sagaydak, etc
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
yes it is , after betiev goes down to smith jr and dugh lungerund goes home the better cant think of no more good
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
Certainly wouldn't call it a fad. More like a particularly bright spot for Eastern European Boxing that isn't likely to repeat itself on a regular basis, but good fighters always come about again, and good fighters of the past inspire more to follow in their footsteps.
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
well thats it in a nut shell people were saying the same thing about american boxers a few years back, when you get old enough you realise every thing is on repeatgilgamesh wrote: ↑05 Mar 2021, 21:45 Certainly wouldn't call it a fad. More like a particularly bright spot for Eastern European Boxing that isn't likely to repeat itself on a regular basis, but good fighters always come about again, and good fighters of the past inspire more to follow in their footsteps.
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
It would repeat itself on a regular basis if the big western promoters signed up the best amateurs. The talent is there and has always been there. Go look at the boxrec amateur rankings, the ex soviet union countries dominate the top of the rankings in every division. Russia in particular have so much strength in depthgilgamesh wrote: ↑05 Mar 2021, 21:45 Certainly wouldn't call it a fad. More like a particularly bright spot for Eastern European Boxing that isn't likely to repeat itself on a regular basis, but good fighters always come about again, and good fighters of the past inspire more to follow in their footsteps.
USA promoters went through a phase of signing quite a lot of them. But in the last few years they aren't signing as many maybe because they don't sell tickets or something like that. Trust me if Bob Arum suddenly decided to sign the best 20 Russian/Ukraine etc amateurs you would see another 'golden period'
The talent is on display in russian pro shows like 'Patriot Boxing promotions' and RCC promotions more lately now though.
Last edited by Goodz on 05 Mar 2021, 22:40, edited 1 time in total.
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
Amateurs and Pros is 2 different things. Ask the Cubans.Goodz wrote: ↑05 Mar 2021, 22:35It would repeat itself on a regular basis if the big western promoters signed up the best amateurs. The talent is there and has always been there. Go look at the boxrec amateur rankings, the ex soviet union countries dominate the top of the rankings in every division. Russia in particular have so much strength in depth.gilgamesh wrote: ↑05 Mar 2021, 21:45 Certainly wouldn't call it a fad. More like a particularly bright spot for Eastern European Boxing that isn't likely to repeat itself on a regular basis, but good fighters always come about again, and good fighters of the past inspire more to follow in their footsteps.
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
Thats Cubans though. These fighters are different to cubans they usually adapt to the pros good. >>> W Klitschko, V Klitschko, Usyk, Lomachenko, Golovkin, Tszyu, Beterbiev, Pirog, etcgilgamesh wrote: ↑05 Mar 2021, 22:38Amateurs and Pros is 2 different things. Ask the Cubans.Goodz wrote: ↑05 Mar 2021, 22:35It would repeat itself on a regular basis if the big western promoters signed up the best amateurs. The talent is there and has always been there. Go look at the boxrec amateur rankings, the ex soviet union countries dominate the top of the rankings in every division. Russia in particular have so much strength in depth.gilgamesh wrote: ↑05 Mar 2021, 21:45 Certainly wouldn't call it a fad. More like a particularly bright spot for Eastern European Boxing that isn't likely to repeat itself on a regular basis, but good fighters always come about again, and good fighters of the past inspire more to follow in their footsteps.
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
Some Amateurs adapt and some don't. I don't think it applies to nationality. Just depends on the individual.Goodz wrote: ↑05 Mar 2021, 22:43Thats Cubans though. These fighters are different to cubans they usually adapt to the pros good. >>> W Klitschko, V Klitschko, Usyk, Lomachenko, Golovkin, Tszyu, Beterbiev, Pirog, etcgilgamesh wrote: ↑05 Mar 2021, 22:38Amateurs and Pros is 2 different things. Ask the Cubans.Goodz wrote: ↑05 Mar 2021, 22:35
It would repeat itself on a regular basis if the big western promoters signed up the best amateurs. The talent is there and has always been there. Go look at the boxrec amateur rankings, the ex soviet union countries dominate the top of the rankings in every division. Russia in particular have so much strength in depth.
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
Its hardly a blip anyway right now
Usyk, Lomachenko, Beterbiev,Breidis, Golovkin , Bivol, << at least 3 or 4 of them are top 10 p4p
Usyk, Lomachenko, Beterbiev,Breidis, Golovkin , Bivol, << at least 3 or 4 of them are top 10 p4p
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
I was Just gonna post this tooShhhh wrote: ↑06 Mar 2021, 03:47Hrgovic is from Croatia.... definitely not EurasianPerkin Warbeck wrote: ↑05 Mar 2021, 11:30 Some of the best Eurasian boxers are currently being avoided, such as Makhmudov, Hrgovic, Kossobutskiy, Davtaev, and Majidov in the heavyweight division. Others have been poorly managed/promoted.
Don't judge them all by mediocre, no-defense Bohachuck. For example, Madrimov is much better.![]()
Beautiful country though, should you ever fancy visiting.
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
Croatia IS in eastern europe. And they are Slavics
Basically from Slovenia/Croatia/Czech Republic east towards to Asia is Eastern Europe.
Basically from Slovenia/Croatia/Czech Republic east towards to Asia is Eastern Europe.
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
It's in central and South-Eastern Europe. When I went there I didn't think of it as Eastern Europe, But whatever... Do they consider themselves an Eastern European country?
-
Winter king
- Lightweight
- Posts: 128
- Joined: 01 Sep 2017, 19:33
Re: was the east euro craze just a short lived fad?
Yes. Im eastern european and generally everything east to germany italy and austria is considered eastern europe. At the least culturally. Basically post soviet countries. Also Kazakhstan is in the middle of asia so how is that eastern europe for you?