I doubt it was over the bill. It was probably over something else.
Steve Cunningham vs Frank Mir
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39230
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
I'm surprised Mir is only 41 tbh, seems like he's been around forever
i didnt know he was actually francisco santos mir either![[icon_e_surprised.gif] :oo](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
i didnt know he was actually francisco santos mir either
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
Are we seriously talking about this nonsense fight?Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑15 Mar 2021, 17:02He just needs to box him.
This is Tarver’s way of entering the WBA rankings..![]()
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39230
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
i think antonio smacked a b!tch up for not putting enough topping on his waffles
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
Of course not. We are engaged in a serious discourse about waffle toppings.lazboy wrote: ↑18 Mar 2021, 02:37Are we seriously talking about this nonsense fight?Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑15 Mar 2021, 17:02He just needs to box him.
This is Tarver’s way of entering the WBA rankings..![]()
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
By the way, there's another interesting fact about names. Tarver hasn't won any Franks, while Mir defeated two Antonios (Nogueira X2, Silva) and Antoni Hardonk. It seems like Tarver is condemned.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑18 Mar 2021, 01:58 i didnt know he was actually francisco santos mir either![]()
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
But what are the stats on them fighting Mir's and Tarver's?DrDuke wrote: ↑18 Mar 2021, 16:09By the way, there's another interesting fact about names. Tarver hasn't won any Franks, while Mir defeated two Antonios (Nogueira X2, Silva) and Antoni Hardonk. It seems like Tarver is condemned.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑18 Mar 2021, 01:58 i didnt know he was actually francisco santos mir either![]()
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
Unfortunately, unavailable.gilgamesh wrote: ↑18 Mar 2021, 17:02But what are the stats on them fighting Mir's and Tarver's?DrDuke wrote: ↑18 Mar 2021, 16:09By the way, there's another interesting fact about names. Tarver hasn't won any Franks, while Mir defeated two Antonios (Nogueira X2, Silva) and Antoni Hardonk. It seems like Tarver is condemned.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑18 Mar 2021, 01:58 i didnt know he was actually francisco santos mir either![]()
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
Noqueira boxed in the 2007 Pan American games in Rio. He was decent. I ref'd one of his fights in the quarter finals. He won but lost to the Cuban in the semi's. He also fought big Bob Sapp who was like 375 lbs. in a Pride fight. He got hammered early on but eventually got Sapp on the ground and tapping out to an arm bar. These guys are all wacked fighting at their age.joshj909 wrote: ↑14 Mar 2021, 05:32Personally, I think the Noqueira fight stands out as his great striking performance and although his stand up looked much more composed in his fights against Bigfoot and Dufee, their chins were non-existant at this point and the KO was almost inevitable.
Either way, it's still not good enough to beat Tarver with his skills, it may just be who's body has the most left which is a sad way to judge a fight.
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
No doubt Tarver will break the poor Mir but at his age, he should be concerned with doing something else, like training his junior.
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
Wish he was trolling but sadly not far from the truth. Boxing has kind of become boring, with the top fighters not fighting the other best.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑13 Mar 2021, 18:38He's the biggest name in boxing.LeRoiDuRing wrote: ↑13 Mar 2021, 17:47Since when is Jake Paul an household name ? The man is a meme fighter and is only destined to have meme fight. That's why he is about and people after just a couple of years are starting to caugh up with the bs and understands why those fights are ridiculous and shouldn't happen.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑13 Mar 2021, 16:57
If Jake Paul wants you on his undercard, you do it. Mir wasn't a good boxer by UFC standards. Easy money.
Opening it up for these so-called meme guys that people care more about.
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
Yep and the top boxers that don't want to fight each other deserve to take a backseat to the "meme fighters"Trent wrote: ↑21 Mar 2021, 03:50Wish he was trolling but sadly not far from the truth. Boxing has kind of become boring, with the top fighters not fighting the other best.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑13 Mar 2021, 18:38He's the biggest name in boxing.LeRoiDuRing wrote: ↑13 Mar 2021, 17:47
Since when is Jake Paul an household name ? The man is a meme fighter and is only destined to have meme fight. That's why he is about and people after just a couple of years are starting to caugh up with the bs and understands why those fights are ridiculous and shouldn't happen.
Opening it up for these so-called meme guys that people care more about.
If Crawford vs Spence actually does happen I really hope it is on the undercard of a Jake Paul event and they make a fraction of the money Paul makes.
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
He might be older in fight years as well. The motorcycle accident, plus other injuries that come with MMA, broken arm, has been knocked out 10x.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101105
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
Tarver is out. He didn’t meet the requirements set out by the Georgia State commission.
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
Replaced by Steve Cunningham. This is a worse option for Mir.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑24 Mar 2021, 03:57 Tarver is out. He didn’t meet the requirements set out by the Georgia State commission.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101105
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
Where has he popped out from.DrDuke wrote: ↑24 Mar 2021, 04:21Replaced by Steve Cunningham. This is a worse option for Mir.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑24 Mar 2021, 03:57 Tarver is out. He didn’t meet the requirements set out by the Georgia State commission.
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
Probably he was prepared as an substitute from the beginning.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑24 Mar 2021, 04:28Where has he popped out from.DrDuke wrote: ↑24 Mar 2021, 04:21Replaced by Steve Cunningham. This is a worse option for Mir.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑24 Mar 2021, 03:57 Tarver is out. He didn’t meet the requirements set out by the Georgia State commission.
Of course, Cunningham is way past prime and rusty, but less than Tarver, and he's at least 44 now.
Re: Steve Cunningham vs Frank Mir
Nice, 44 years is not totally grandpa. He will mop the floor with Mir as a warning for mma fighters who are challenging top boxers in boxing matches.
Re: Steve Cunningham vs Frank Mir
Georgia commission has a bylaw that says a fighter age 50 or older has to have had 10 fights in the 10 preceding years.
Tarver doesn't qualify.
Tarver doesn't qualify.
Re: Antonio Tarver vs Frank Mir
Tarver should easily beat Frank Mir, who has the same level of boxing experience as McGregor.LeRoiDuRing wrote: ↑13 Mar 2021, 15:02 This might be slightly off-topic but why is Antonio Tarver coming back ? Is he broke ? And how much money is he getting from that ?
As I never heard of the other guy I really can't tell who's the most likely to win
-
Jeff_lacy_ko
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 5711
- Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15
Re: Steve Cunningham vs Frank Mir
Antonio tarver is broke for the person who asked. He owes a ton in back child support and he lost that sweet showtime gig because of steroids he has almost no money coming in
Re: Steve Cunningham vs Frank Mir
Cunningham now, instead of Tarver? Mir is going to get fcked up!