Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!
Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!
Fair play to Sandland, he's shifted a lot of weight.
Does look like he's gone from fat fat to skinny fat.
Does look like he's gone from fat fat to skinny fat.
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39335
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!
chris byrd wasnt a fat ass as a hw tbf, him cutting down to 175 was much more exttreme and he looked emaciated, which josh doesnt
im not sure i really see any muscle that he's lost, i mean how can you with all that lard in the first pic. i think he just has a funny looking body. does he have a c-section scar btw
im not sure i really see any muscle that he's lost, i mean how can you with all that lard in the first pic. i think he just has a funny looking body. does he have a c-section scar btw
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39335
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!
you see guys taller and more ripped than him at light heavy, tbh he could prob cut even further, he's only 5'10 (shortish even down at 175) and still has no definitiion
at super middle, you have benavidez, plant, and smith between 6'1 -6'3 and clearly cut their fat lower than josh has
at super middle, you have benavidez, plant, and smith between 6'1 -6'3 and clearly cut their fat lower than josh has
Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!
He needs to lift some weights
-
leftrightleft
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 108
- Joined: 03 May 2013, 19:37
Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!
Shocked hes going to light heavy. Crusier wouldve made more sense
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39335
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!
he doesnt look emaciated at all, not even the slightest bit of definition, even still got a bit of a tum and bulging sides
compare him to 175 unified champ
i'm sure most light heavys and super middles would be heavys too if they were as fat as 5'10 josh was

compare him to 175 unified champ
i'm sure most light heavys and super middles would be heavys too if they were as fat as 5'10 josh was

-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39335
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!
he sure ain't 'very thin' lol
is he feeble? we'll have to see, but he'll be closer to his natural weight than he was at hw
is he feeble? we'll have to see, but he'll be closer to his natural weight than he was at hw
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39335
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!
sTILL GOT A FAIR BIT TOO LOSE , SHOULD AIM FOR SUPER MIDDLE
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39335
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!
if that's him going for lhw, what division would he be fighting in looking as ripped as these two


Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!
While it wasn't a great fight, the skill level both showed, speed of hand and foot, head movement, fitness really put to shame both heavyweight fights and prob neither will win a British title.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑27 Mar 2021, 19:26 if that's him going for lhw, what division would he be fighting in looking as ripped as these two
![]()
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39335
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!
so what happened to this plan? fighting johnny fish next
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23088
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!
I've just spoken to his manager who said he thinks he had a go when he was with Dave Allen but he (his manager) thought it was a bad idea.